Sweden´s second national report under the Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioaktive waste management (Departementsserien 2005:44)

management waste radioactive of safety the on and management fuel spent of safety the on Convention Joint

Ds 2005:44

Sweden’s second national report under the

Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management

Swedish implementation of the obligations of the Joint Convention

2005:44 Ds

Ds 2005:44

under the Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety

of radioactive waste management

Swedish implementation of the obligations of the Joint Convention

Ministry of

Sustainable Development

Sweden

This report is on sale in Stockholm at Fritzes Bookshop, which supplies Swedish official government reports (SOUs) and departmental series (Ds) and also on behalf of the Government Offices, Office for Administrative Affairs, arranges for them to be circulated to the competent parties

for comments.

Address:	Fritzes, Customer Service
	SE-106 47 Stockholm
	Sweden
	Telefax: 08 690 91 91 (national)
	+46 8 690 91 91 (international)
	Telephone: 08 690 91 90 (national)
	+46 8 690 91 90 (international)
	E-mail: order.fritzes.@nj.se
	Internet:www.fritzes.se

Printed by Elanders Gotab AB

Stockholm 2005

ISBN 91-38-22446-1

ISSN 0284-60112

CONTENTS

Foreword................................................................................................................		5
List of abbreviations..................................................................................................		7
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................................................................		8
SECTION A	INTRODUCTION..........................................................................	11
SECTION B	POLICIES AND PRACTICES ...........................................................	21
SECTION C	SCOPE OF APPLICATION .............................................................	23
SECTION D	INVENTORIES AND LISTS.............................................................	24
SECTION E	LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY SYSTEM.......................................	35
SECTION F	OTHER GENERAL SAFETY PROVISIONS.........................................	63
SECTION G	SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT.......................................	83
SECTION H	SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT ........................	99
SECTION I	TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENT.................................................	121
SECTION J	DISUSED SEALED SOURCES........................................................	123
SECTION K	PLANNED ACTIVITIES TO IMPROVE SAFETY.................................	125
List of references	................................................................................................	129

Foreword

ThisreportisissuedaccordingtoArticle32of theJointConventionontheSafetyof SpentFuelManagement and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management.

Sweden signed the Joint Convention September 29, 1997, the ﬁ rst day it was open for signing, during the ongoing General Conference at IAEA. The Convention was ratiﬁ ed about two years later, on July 29, 1999 and it entered into force on June 18, 2001.

Sweden has been active for many years in the international effort to enhance nuclear safety and radiation protectionwithregardtotheoperationof nuclearreactorsaswellasthemanagementof spentfuelandradioactive waste. The Convention on Nuclear Safety was an important ﬁ rst step to deal with the most immediate safety issues, i.e. the safety of operation of commercial nuclear power reactors. The Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management constitutes another important step by promoting the safe handling and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste.

TheareascoveredbytheJointConventionhavebeenincorporatedintheSwedishsystemforspentfueland radioactive waste management for a long time. The Swedish Government considered at the time of signing the Joint Convention that the safety philosophy, legislation and the safety work conducted by the licensees and the authorities in Sweden complied with the obligations of the Convention.

The ﬁ rst report on the Swedish implementation of the obligations under the Joint Convention was issued in April 2003. As a self assessment Sweden complied with all the obligations.

During the period before the review meeting, Sweden received in total 133 questions on the report from 19 countries. The questions addressed many different areas and no speciﬁ c weaknesses were identiﬁ ed. The questions were mostly requests for clariﬁ cations and minor additions.

The report was well received at the ﬁ rst review meeting 3-14 November 2003 at the IAEA headquarters in Vienna. It was appreciated that Sweden had produced a comprehensive National Report and presentation, and had answered the written questions thoroughly.

During the discussion at the review meeting it was agreed that Sweden seems to comply well with the obligations of the Joint Convention. The meeting emphasized that Sweden is in the forefront of several aspects of spent fuel and radioactive waste management, and expressed a desire for Sweden to provide information on developments in these areas in the next report. It was especially noted that Sweden demonstrated good practices with regards to:

-public consultation in the decision making process,

-arrangements in place to ﬁ nance all items related to spent fuel and radioactive waste management and decommissioning of nuclear power plants, and other nuclear facilities and installations.

Sweden accepted to include the following issues in its next report:

-theoutcomeof theGovernmentalcommitteethatwasappointedin2002toconsiderandproposeanational system for the management and ﬁ nal disposal of radioactive waste generated outside the nuclear fuel cycle,

-the development of more comprehensive, consistent and clear safety regulations for decommissioning nuclear facilities,

-the development of a consistent and complete set of waste acceptance criteria for long-lived waste to be stored pending disposal.

As was the case with the ﬁ rst report, the present report has been produced by a working group with representatives from the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI), the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI), and the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB). SKI was assigned the task of co-ordinating the work. Before submission to the Government the report was sent for comments to other relevant authorities and the nuclear industry. It was also presented in the boards of SKI and SSI.

This report constitutes an up-dated document with basically the same structure as the ﬁ rst report under the Joint Convention. The most important developments and changes compared to the previous report are highlighted in the executive summary.

Section A of this report provides an overview of the Swedish nuclear waste programme, including a brief historical review, in order to give the reader a background to the current programme for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste.

Sections B to J provide information on which the conclusions are drawn about the compliance with the obligationsof theJointConvention.Bynecessitythisinformationisratherbrief andstronglyfocusedonthose aspectswhichareaddressedinthearticles.Toomanydetailsandadditionalinformationwouldoverloadthereport andmakethereviewprocessdifﬁ cult.ThegoalhasbeentoprovideenoughdetailstomaketheSwedishpractices understandable. Data that might be missing will be added on request as a part of the review process.

ThegeneralconclusionsabouttheSwedishcompliancewiththeobligationof theConventionarereported in the executive summary.

List of abbreviations

ALARA	As Low As Reasonable Achievable (a principle applied in radiation protection )
ASAR	As operated Safety Analysis Report
BKAB	Barsebäck Kraft AB
BNFL	British Nuclear Fuel Ltd
BSS	The Basic Safety Standards Directive of the Euratom
BWR	Boiling Water Reactor
Clab	Centralt Lager för Använt Bränsle (Central Interim Storage for Spent Fuel)
COGEMA	Compagnie Général de Matières Nucléaires
CTH	Chalmers Tekniska Högskola (Chalmers Institute of Tecnology)
EIA	Environmental Impact Assessment
EIS	Environmental Impact Statement
FKA	Forsmarks Kraftgrupp AB
FSAR	Final Safety Analysis Report
GDC	General Design Criteria
ICRP	The International Commission on Radiation Protection
INES	The IAEA/NEA International Nuclear Event Scale
KASAM	The Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste
KSU	KärnkraftSäkerhet och Utbildning AB (the Swedish Nuclear Training and Safety Center)
KTH	Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan (Royal Institute of Technology)
LER	Licensee Event Report
LLW	Low Level Waste
LILW	Low and Intermediate Level Waste
MTO	Interaction between Man-Technology and Organization
NEA	Nuclear Energy Agency within the OECD
NKS	Nordisk kärnsäkerhetsforskning (Nordic Safety Research)
NPP	Nuclear Power Plant (including all nuclear power units at one site)
OECD	Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
OKG	Oskarshamns Kraftgrupp AB
PSAR	Preliminary Safety Analysis Report
PSR	Periodic Safety Review
PWR	Pressurized Water Reactor
QA	Quality Assurance
RAB	Ringhals AB
R&D	Research and Development
SAR	Safety Analysis Report
SFL-2	Repository for Spent Nuclear Fuel
SFL 3-5	Repository for Long-lived Low and Intermediate Waste
SFR-1	Repository for Operational Waste
SKB	Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co
SKI	Statens kärnkraftinspektion (Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate)
SKIFS	Statens kärnkraftinspektions författningssamling (the SKI Code of Regulations)
SSI	Statens strålskyddsinstitut (Swedish Radiation Protection Authority)
SSI FS	Statens strålskyddsinstituts författningssamling (the SSI Code of Regulations)
STF	Säkerhetstekniska föreskrifter (Technical Speciﬁ cations)
VLLW	Very Low Level Waste
WENRA	Western European Nuclear Regulators Association
WTD	Waste Type Description

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Article32of theJointConventioncallsforaself-assessmentbyeachContractingPartyregardingcompliance with the obligations of the Convention. This self-assessment should be reported in the National Report to the Review Meetings. Sweden’s self-assessment has demonstrated compliance with all the obligations of the Convention, as shown in detail in sections B to K of this report.

Having taken a very active part in the creation of the Joint Convention, Sweden wishes to emphasise the incentive character of the Convention. In Sweden’s opinion, the Convention implies a commitment to continuous improvement of safety whenever operating experience, safety research or technical development indicates that there is room for such improvement. Continuous learning from experience and a proactive approach to safety are in fact corner stones of the current Swedish nuclear and radiation safety work, both for the industry and the regulatory bodies. Therefore, Sweden has found it important that its National Report highlights strong features in national practices, as well as areas in which improvements are justiﬁ ed. Implementation of such improvements should then be followed up in the National Reports to subsequent Review Meetings.

The major events in the Swedish nuclear programme since the ﬁ rst report to the Convention was issued are:

-The general safety regulations of SKI (SKIFS 1998:1) have been revised and issued as SKIFS 2004:1.

-A commission of inquiry has been carried out in order to review and suggest improvements to the ﬁ nancing system.

-The second unit of the twin nuclear power plant unit at Barsebäck (Barsebäck 2) was permanently shut down 31 May 2005. The ﬁ rst unit (Barsebäck 1) was closed in 1999.

-The research reactors R2 and R2-0 at the Studsvik site were permanently shut down 16 June 2005.

-The Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. (SKB) has announced its decision to take over operation of the interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel (Clab). The operation of Clab is currently contracted out to OKG, who operates the three nuclear power plant units at the Oskarshamn site.

These events create new challenges for the safety work of the licensees as well as for the regulatory bodies. However,thegenerallypositiveimpressionreportedtotheﬁ rstreviewmeetingundertheConventionstillstands. Therefore, Sweden would like to point out the following as strong features in its national nuclear practice:

-The responsibility for safety is clearly deﬁ ned in the Swedish legal framework. In order not to dilute the responsibility of the licence holders, the Swedish regulations are designed to deﬁ ne requirements to be achieved, not the detailed means to achieve them. Within the framework given by the regulations, the licence holders have to deﬁ ne their own solutions, and demonstrate the safety level achieved to the regulatory bodies.

-The legislation clearly deﬁ nes that all licence holders are responsible for the safe handling and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as well as for the decommissioning and dismantling of facilities.

-The operators of nuclear power plants must jointly carry out the research and development activities needed to ensure the safe handling and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste, as well as for the decommissioning of facilities. The R&D programme is presented to the Government regularly and is subject to regulatory review.

-The operators of nuclear power plants must pay fees to the Nuclear Waste Fund, which is subject to regulatory supervision, to ensure that resources are available for the handling and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste, and for the decommissioning and dismantling of the facilities.

-There is an open and generally constructive relationship between the regulatory bodies and the licence holders.

Even though comprehensive and very active programmes for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste have been established, many challenges remain. Over the next 10–20 years several new facilities will be sited, constructed and taken into operation, e.g. an encapsulation plant and a repository for spent fuel. These activities will require substantial efforts for both the nuclear industry and the regulatory bodies.

Sweden also wishes to mention that there are areas in which improvements to the national waste management system are needed:

-The implementation of suggested improvements to the management system of radioactive waste generated outside the nuclear fuel cycle, as suggested by a Governmental committee.

-The ﬁ nancing system as well as the regulatory review procedures related to the ﬁ nancing system need to be improved and modernised.

Sweden is looking forward to reporting on its progress to future Review Meetings under the Joint Convention.

At the ﬁ rst review meeting in November 2003, Sweden accepted to report on the following issues in particular, in its next report:

1.The outcome of the Governmental committee to consider and propose a national system for the management and ﬁ nal disposal of radioactive waste generated outside the nuclear fuel cycle.

2.The development of more comprehensive, consistent and clear safety regulations for decommissioning of nuclear facilities.

3.The development of a consistent and complete set of waste acceptance criteria for long-lived waste to be stored pending disposal.

These reports can be found in the following sections:

1.section K.2

2.section E.19.1.1 and F.26.1.1

3.section K.4

These reports do not indicate any concerns as to the Swedish compliance with the obligations under the Joint Convention.

SECTION A – INTRODUCTION

A.1 Summary

Spent fuel in Sweden emanates mainly from four commercial nuclear power plants, one material testing reactor and one research reactor. The radioactive waste originates from the nuclear power industry as well as medical use, industry, research and consumer products. Past research activities have also generated some waste, which are either stored or have already been disposed of.

Under Swedish law, the holder of a licence to operate a nuclear facility is primarily responsible for the safe handlinganddisposalof spentnuclearfuelandradioactivewaste,aswellasdecommissioninganddismantling of the facility. The four utilities operating nuclear power reactors in Sweden have formed a special company, theSwedishNuclearFuelandWasteManagementCo.(SKB),toassisttheminexecutingtheirresponsibilities. Thus, SKB is responsible for all handling, transportation and storage of spent fuel and radioactive waste outside the nuclear power plants. Furthermore, the company is responsible for the planning and construction of all facilities required for the management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive wastes, and for such research and development work as is necessitated by the provision of such facilities (R&D programmes).

These R&D programmes have to be reported to the Government, or an authority designated by the Government, and reviewed by the authorities every third year. The programme should include a comprehensive description of the measures taken to ensure safe handling and disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste. SKB is further responsible for co-ordination and investigations regarding the costs associated with nuclear waste and future decommissioning.

Spent nuclear fuel is transported to an interim storage facility (Clab). Radioactive operational waste from nuclear reactors, medical and research institutions and industrial radioactive waste is disposed of in an underground repository in crystalline bedrock (SFR-1).

Facilities that remain to be realised are an encapsulation plant for spent fuel and repositories for spent fuel, long-lived low and intermediate level waste, and for decommissioning waste. SKB:s R&D programmes are focused on these matters.

The locations of existing nuclear facilities in Sweden are shown in Figure A1.

Figure A1: Nuclear Facilities in Sweden.

A.2	Fundamental principles

Principles for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste have evolved over the years and have been discussed by the Swedish parliament. The allocation of responsibilities is reﬂ ected in the Swedish legislation, and is further described in section E.19. The principles can be summarised:

1.The expenses for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste are to be covered by revenues from the production of energy that has resulted in these expenses.

2.The reactor owners are to safely dispose of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste.

3.Thestatehastheultimateresponsibilityforspentnuclearfuelandnuclearwaste.Thelong-termresponsi- bility for the handling and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste should rest with the state. After a repository has been closed, a requirement should be established to ensure that some kind of responsibility for and supervision of the repository can be made and maintained for a considerable time. A government authority could assume responsibility for a closed repository.

4.Each country is to be responsible for the spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste generated in that country. The disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste from nuclear activities in another country may not occur in Sweden other than in an exceptional case.

A.3	Management system for spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste

Sweden has today 10 nuclear power reactor reactors in operation at three sites giving rise to nuclear waste and spent nuclear fuel. In addition nuclear waste is produced at the Studsvik site (research reactor, hot-cell and waste treatment facilities) and, to a limited extent, at Westinghouse Atom AB’s fuel fabrication plant.

In total the Swedish nuclear power programme will generate approximately 19 000 m3 spent fuel, 60 000 m3 low and intermediate level waste (LILW), and 160 000 m3 decommissioning waste (based on 40-year operation of each reactor). The typical total annual production of LILW at the nuclear facilities is 1 000–1 500 m3.

Figure A2: Material and waste streams in the Swedish nuclear cycle.

A.3.1

Existing management practices

Most of the LILW are conditioned (solidiﬁ ed, compacted, etc.) at the point of origin, i.e. at the reactor sites. Some wastes are sent to Studsvik’s waste treatment facilities for incineration or melting (scrap metal).

The central interim storage for spent fuel, Clab

ThespentnuclearfuelfromallSwedishnuclearpowerreactorsisstoredinacentralinterimstorage(Clab)situatedat the Oskarshamn nuclear power plant. The fuel is stored in water pools in rock caverns 25 m deep in the bedrock.

Construction started in 1980 and it was taken into operation in 1985. The current total storage capacity is 5 000 tonnes of spent fuel, and 4 182 tonnes were being stored at the end of 2004.

Clab has recently been expanded with a second rock cavern with water pools. The extended part of the facility is expected to be approved for storage of spent nuclear fuel before the end of 2005. The capacity after the expansion is sufﬁ cient for storing all spent fuel from the nuclear power reactors, approximately 8 000 tonnes.

Repository for radioactive operational waste, SFR-1

SFR-1 is a repository for LILW resulting from the operation of Swedish nuclear reactors. In addition small amounts of radioactive waste from hospitals, research institutions and industry are disposed of in SFR 1.

SFR-1 consists of fourrock caverns andasilo. Thefacilityis situated in crystallinebedrock, approximately 50 m below the seabed at a depth of 5 m. Construction started in 1983 and it was taken into operation in 1988. The total capacity is 63 000 m3 and 30 446 m3 had been used by 2004-12-31.

Shallow land burials

The nuclear power plants at Ringhals, Forsmark and Oskarshamn as well as the Studsvik site have shallow land burials for solid short-lived low-level waste (<300 kBq/kg). Each burial is licensed for a total activity of 100 - 200 GBq (the highest level according to the legislation is 10 TBq, of which a maximum of 10 GBq may consist of alpha-active substances).

Figure A3: Management system for spent fuel and nuclear waste.

Clearance

Althoughclearanceisnota“facility”itisanimportantcomponentinthewastemanagementsystem.Material may be cleared for unrestricted use or for disposal as conventional non-radioactive waste. For example in 2004 approximately 600 tonnes were cleared for disposal at municipal landﬁ lls. In addition 500 tonnes of melted scrap metal (<500 Bq/kg) were cleared for recycling.

Transportation system

All transportation of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste is by sea, since all the nuclear facilities are situated onthecoast.Thetransportationsystemhasbeen in operationsince 1982andconsists of theship M/S Sigyn, transport casks and containers, and terminal vehicles for loading and unloading.

A.3.2

Planned facilities and siting

Four major facilities remain to be designed, sited, constructed and licensed; a plant for the encapsulation of spent nuclear fuel, a repository for spent fuel, a repository for long-lived low and intermediate level waste, and a repository for waste from decommissioning and dismantling the nuclear power plants.

The main alternative for disposal of spent fuel, KBS-3, involves emplacement of fuel elements in copper canisters (corrosion resistance) with cast iron inserts (mechanical strength). The canisters will be embedded in bentonite clay in individual deposition holes at a depth of 400-700 m in the bedrock.

Encapsulation plant for spent nuclear fuel

The main alternative is to site the encapsulation plant adjacent to Clab. Other alternatives are however under investigation, e.g. co-siting with the spent fuel repository.

The time schedule for encapsulation of the spent nuclear fuel has been developed by SKB, and the following sequence of events is proposed:

2006	Submission of license application for siting and construction
2009–2017	Construction and commissioning, including inactive trial operation
2015	Submission of application for operation
2017	Active trial operation, followed by operation

In 1998 a canister laboratory was commissioned. The aim is to develop welding techniques and methods for non-destructive testing of canisters and welds, amongst other things.

Repository for spent nuclear fuel

In the early 1990’s SKB initiated an active programme for siting a spent nuclear fuel repository. SKB’s time schedule for disposal of the spent nuclear fuel is:

2005–2009	Site investigations, presently at two sites, which include surface based investigation from
	deep bore holes
2008/2009	Submission of license application for siting and construction
2011–2017	Detailed site characterisation and construction
2016	Application for the initial operation
2018	Start of waste emplacement

An important step in the repository development programme was the construction of the Äspö hard rock laboratory in the 1990’s. The laboratory is situated close to the Oskarshamn nuclear power plant at a depth of 460 meter. At the laboratory methods are developed and tested for such things as site characterisation, deposition and retrieval of canisters, as well as methods for excavation of tunnels and shafts.

Repository for short-lived low and intermediate level decommissioning waste

SKBplanstodisposeof wastefromthefuturedecommissioningof thenuclearpowerplantsinanextensionto SFR-1. SKB intends to submit a license application in 2010 and operation is planned to commence in 2020.

Repository for long-lived low and intermediate level waste

According to current plans, a repository for long-lived low and intermediate level waste will be sited in about 2035. The origin of this waste is primarily research, industry, medical applications, core-components and certain internal components from nuclear power reactors.

The waste is currently stored at Studsvik, the nuclear power plants and Clab. There are however preliminary plans to construct a special central interim storage for this waste.

2000

2005

2010

2015

2020

2025

2030

2035

2040

2045

2050

Encapsulation plant

Design

License application

Regulatory review

Construction

Application for operation

Regulatory review

Initial operation

Regular operation

Repository for spent nuclear fuel

Initial site investigations

Complete site investigations

License application

Regulatory review

Detailed site characterisation and construction

Application for operation

Regulatory review

Initial operation

Regular operation

Repository for short-lived low and intermediate level waste

Design

License application

Regulatory review

Construction

Application for operation

Regulatory review

Operation

Repository for long-lived low and intermediate level waste

Safety evaluation

Siting, design and construction

Operation

Figure A4: Time schedule for planned facilities.

A.4	Legal and regulatory framework

The management of spent fuel and nuclear waste is regulated by a series of statutory provisions, of which the three main legislative instruments are:

-TheActonNuclearActivities(1984:3),whichdeﬁ nesthelicensingrequirementsfortheconstructionand operation of nuclear facilities and for handling or using nuclear materials (including radioactive waste).

-The Radiation Protection Act (1988:220), which deﬁ nes the licensing requirements for radiation protection and for radiological work.

-The Act on the Financing of Future Expenses for Spent Nuclear Fuel etc. (1992:1537), which deals with the main financial aspects, and defines the responsibilities pertaining to the management and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste.

UndertheActonNuclearActivitiestheholderof alicencetooperateanuclearreactorisprimarilyresponsible for the safe handling and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste produced by the reactor. In addition the holder is responsible – under the Radiation Protection Act – to take all measures and precautions necessary to prevent or counteract injury to human health and the environment by radiation.

Parliament

Acts

Government

Ordi-

nances

Ministry of

KASAM

Sustainable

Development

Swedish

Regula-

tions

Nuclear Power

Radiation Protection

Inspectorate

Authority

SKI

SSI

Regulatory

Legislation

Supervision

Licensees

Figure A5: Organisational structure for nuclear safety and radiation protection regulatory control.

The Act on the Financing of Future Expenses on Spent Nuclear Fuel is an essential part of the Swedish nuclear waste management system since it lays down the principles for the ﬁ nancing of expenses for decommissioning and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. The basic requirement stipulates that the holder of a licence to operate a nuclear power reactor must pay a fee per delivered kWh of electricity to the Nuclear Waste Fund. SKB makes the annual cost estimates for all nuclear power utilities that form the basis for the regulatory authorities’ review as well as the basis for calculating the fee. After its review, SKI submits a proposal for the size of the fees to the Government. The size of the fee is decided by the Government for each year and is individual for each utility. The purpose of the Fund is to cover all expenses incurred for the safe handling and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, as well as dismantling nuclear facilities and disposing of the decommissioning waste. The Fund must also ﬁ nance SKB’s R&D.

The Environmental Code (1998:808) is also of great importance, in particular for the siting and construction of new facilities since amongst other things it regulates the environmental impact statement that must accompany a licence application. Any new nuclear facility must be licensed according to both the Act on Nuclear Activities and the Environmental Code. In both cases the Government grants the licence on the basis of recommendations and reviews of the competent authorities.

Authorities responsible for enforcing compliance with the legislation are:

-the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI), and

-the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI).

The National Council for Nuclear Waste (KASAM) was established in 1985 and is an advisory body to the government on matters related to nuclear waste management. KASAM is since 1992 an independent committee attached to the Ministry of Sustainable Development.

A.5	Historical review
A.5.1	Past practices

No formal requirements for the management of spent fuel and nuclear waste were established in Sweden until the late 1970’s.

In the mid-1990’s SKI and SSI initiated a joint study with the objective to understand past practices regarding management of radioactive waste better. This knowledge is important to allow for the proper and safe conditioning and disposal of old waste still in storage.

Thestudyfocusedonthemanagementof radioactivewastecontainingplutoniumfromresearchactivities. Activities that generated plutonium-containing waste have been identiﬁ ed as well as the treatment, storage, and in certain cases, dumping at sea of the waste produced. Sea dumping of radioactive waste was limited to low-level waste and occurred in Swedish territorial waters as well as in the Atlantic. The last dumping occurred at the end of the 1960’s. Since 1971 sea dumping is prohibited in Sweden.

Early activities that generated most of the spent fuel and radioactive waste in Sweden were:

-R1 (the ﬁ rst research reactor, 1954–1970),

-Studsvik(aresearchinstituteestablished1958fortheSwedishnuclearprogramme,withresearchreactors in operation 1958-2005), and

-Ågesta (the ﬁ rst power reactor in Sweden, 1964–1974).

A.5.2

Early waste management at the nuclear power plants

Swedishpolicywasoriginallybasedontheassumptionthatreprocessingandplutoniumrecyclingwouldform attractive and desirable elements of the nuclear fuel cycle. However, the construction of a reprocessing plant in Sweden was not envisaged. As commercial NPPs were built, arrangements were made therefore to send the spent nuclear fuel abroad for reprocessing. During the late 1970’s attitudes changed, and reprocessing was, for various reasons, not considered an acceptable method for the management of spent nuclear fuel. The current policy regarding the management of spent nuclear fuel was established in the late 1970’s, and aims at direct disposal without reprocessing.

A.5.3 Reprocessing

In 1969 the Swedish nuclear power company, OKG, signed a contract with the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency, which was later taken over by The British Nuclear Fuel Limited (BNFL), for the reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel from OKG in Windscale (later Sellaﬁ eld). In all 140 tons of fuel was shipped to Sellaﬁ eld between 1972 and 1982. The fuel was reprocessed in 1997 and resulted in 136 tons of uranium and 833 kilograms of plutonium. OKG plans to manufacture and use the recovered plutonium in about 100 MOX-fuel elements.

Between 1978 and 1982 an agreement was made between the Swedish Nuclear Fuel Supply Company (SKBF, later renamed SKB) and Compagnie Générale des Matières Nucléaires (COGEMA) regarding the reprocessing of 672 tons of spent nuclear fuel from the Barsebäck, Ringhals and Forsmark NPPs. A total of 55 tons was shipped to La Hague before the contracts were cancelled. The fuel was then exchanged for 24 tons of used MOX-fuel from Germany. The exchange meant that Sweden did not have to build a repository

for vitriﬁ ed waste and Germany did not have to build a repository for used MOX-fuel. The used MOX-fuel from Germany is now stored in the Clab facility.

A.5.4

The nuclear weapons programme

As early as in August 1945, Sweden decided to evaluate the then new situation regarding atomic weapons. The main aim of the research was to ﬁ nd out how Sweden could best protect itself against a nuclear weapon attack. However, from the outset there was an interest in investigating the possibilities of manufacturing nuclear weapons. In 1968, the Swedish government signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty and the plans to acquire nuclear weapons were abandoned.

A.6	Development of the waste management programme

In 1973 the Government appointed a committee (the Committee on Radioactive Waste) to investigate the problem of handling high-level waste from nuclear power plants. The report from the committee was submitted in 1976 and has to a great extent inﬂ uenced subsequent developments. The main ﬁ ndings of the committee were:

-Reprocessing of spent fuel was recommended, with disposal of glass or ceramic solidiﬁ cation of the high-level waste in bedrock, but that further studies should be carried out to clarify the conditions for a non-reprocessing scheme, i.e. direct disposal in bedrock.

-A central storage facility for spent fuel should be established.

-A central repository for lowand medium level radioactive waste should be established.

In the mid-1970’s the Parliament promulgated the “Conditional Act”, which required a government permit to load nuclear fuel into a new reactor. A permit could be issued if the utility presented either an agreement for reprocessing of the spent fuel, or a plan for the completely safe disposal of the high radioactive waste. This meant that direct disposal of the spent fuel could be accepted.

As a result of the ”Conditional Act” the nuclear industry initiated a joint project on nuclear fuel safety (KBS). This included a wide-ranging programme of geological site surveys for the purpose of identifying suitable bedrock sites for the disposal of highly radioactive waste.

The ﬁ rst summary report of the KBS project (KBS-l) was published in 1977. This described a method for the disposal of high-activity reprocessed vitriﬁ ed waste. The report formed the basis for the subsequent permission (in 1979–1980) to load fuel into a number of reactors.

Figure A6: The KBS-3 method is SKB’s reference method for disposal of spent nuclear fuel.

A second summary report (KBS-2) dealing with the disposal of spent non-reprocessed nuclear fuel was issued in 1978. The work initiated by KBS continued on a long-term basis, and a completely revised version of the second report (KBS-3) was published in 1983.

Since 1986 SKB has produced seven R&D programmes with KBS-3 as the main alternative for the disposal of spentfuel.AtpresentSKBisconductingsiteinvestigationsintwomunicipalities.Theauthoritiesareengaged in the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in connection with the siting process.

A.7	Costs for management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste
A.7.1	Development of the ﬁ nancing system

During the 1970’s the nuclear power utilities established their own internal funds for future waste management expenses. These funds were transferred to a new ﬁ nancing system, under regulatory supervision, established in 1981 when the Swedish Parliament passed the Act on the Financing of Future Expenses for Spent Nuclear Fuel etc.

A commission of inquiry was carried out in 2004 in order to review and suggest improvements to the ﬁ nancing system. The committee report is further discussed in section K.3.

A.7.2

Payments to the Nuclear Waste Fund

The nuclear power utilities pay a fee per delivered kilowatt-hour of electricity to the Nuclear Waste Fund. The fee varies from year to year and is individual for each utility. Between 1982 and 1996 the average fee was SEK 0.019 per kilowatt-hour but has sincs then been gradually lowered. The average fee is currently SEK 0.008 per kilowatt-hour (2005) and is based on the assumption that each reactor will generate electricity for 25 years. When the operating period of a reactor exceeds 25 years, a fee must be levied for future expenses for the additional spent fuel and nuclear waste produced.

Since 1996 the nuclear power utilities must provide two forms of guarantees in addition to the fees paid to the Nuclear Waste Fund:

Guarantee I

If a reactor is closed before it has reached 25 years of operating time, a smaller amount than expected will be paid into the Nuclear Waste Fund. The guarantees provided by the reactor licensees must cover this shortfall.

Guarantee II

The other type of guarantee must be available until all nuclear waste has been placed in a repository and must cover contingencies for the waste programme. Guarantee II will be used if expenses for future nuclear waste management become higher than expected, if these expenses have to be met earlier than expected, or if the actual amount in the Fund is lower than was estimated.

SKB makes annual estimates for all nuclear power utilities that form the basis for the regulatory authority’s review as well as the basis for calculating the fee.

A.7.3

Regulatory control

SKI is the regulatory authority that reviews the nuclear power utilities’ cost estimates. Furthermore, SKI reviews the size of the guarantees that nuclear power utilities must make available. After its review, SKI submits a proposal for the size of the fees, and of the size of the guarantees required, to the Government. Based on this proposal, the Government sets the fees and guarantees.

The management of the Nuclear Waste Fund is the responsibility of a separate government agency, the Board of the Nuclear Waste Fund.

A.7.4

Current cost estimates

The estimated total future cost, from 2005 onwards (up to the 2050s), is approximately SEK 53 billion (equivalent to 1000 millions). The sum of the future expenses and of those already accrued on various nuclear waste projects, are approximately SEK 68 billion.

To date, the Nuclear Waste Fund has covered the expenses for:

-Clab;

-the transport system, i.e., the ship Sigyn, containers, special trucks, etc;

-the Canister Laboratory and the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory; and

-SKB’s research and development costs, including siting activities.

The Nuclear Waste Fund will eventually cover expenses for:

-the encapsulation of spent nuclear fuel;

-the repositories for spent nuclear fuel and long-lived low and intermediate level waste;

-the dismantling of nuclear power plants and the disposal of decommissioning waste;

-continuing research and development work; and

-the expenses for regulatory control and supervision after closure of the reactors.

Therepositoryforradioactiveoperationalwaste(SFR-1)hasbeenpaidforbythenuclearpowerutilitiesandnot by the Fund. Costs for management of operational waste are paid for directly by the nuclear power utilities.

A.7.5

Costs for waste from past practices

As of 1989, a special fee has been levied on the nuclear power utilities according to a special law, the Studsvik Act (1988:1597). This fee is intended to cover expenses for the management of nuclear waste from older experimental facilities, in particular the facilities at Studsvik, the Ågesta reactor and the uranium mine in Ranstad, and for dismantling these facilities. According to estimates, SEK 1.5 billion will be needed up to the year 2030 to meet these expenses. The special fee is the same for all four nuclear power utilities, currently SEK 0.0015 per kilowatt-hour, which is reassessed each year based on a proposal by SKI. These assets are administered together with the Nuclear Waste Fund.

Figure A7: Flow of funds in the ﬁ nancing system.

SECTION B – POLICIES AND PRACTICES

ARTICLE 32. REPORTING

1.In accordance with the provisions of Article 30, each Contracting Party shall submit a national report to each review meeting of Contracting Parties. This report shall address the measures taken to implement each of the obligations of the Convention. For each Contracting Party the report shall also address its:

(i)spent fuel management policy;

(ii)spent fuel management practices;

(iii)radioactive waste management policy;

(iv)radioactive waste management practices

(v)criteria used to deﬁ ne and categorize radioactive waste.

B.32 Reporting

The present report constitutes the second Swedish report issued in concurrence with Article 32.

B.32.1

Spent fuel management policy

The Swedish policy is that spent nuclear fuel should be managed and disposed of in a geological formation in Sweden.

B.32.2

Spent fuel management practices

After removal from the reactor core the spent fuel elements are stored at the NPP sites for roughly one year before being transported to the central interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel (Clab). According to current plans, fuel elements after a storage period of about 30–40 years will be transported to the ﬁ nal repository for spent nuclear fuel. Prior to this they will be placed in a cast iron insert in a copper canister. In the ﬁ nal repository they will be surrounded by a buffer of bentonite clay, and deposited in individual vertical bore holes in crystalline bedrock at a depth of 400–700 meters.

The siting process for the repository is ongoing and described in the introduction in section A. According to SKB’splans,therepositoryforspentnuclearfuelisexpectedtocommenceoperationin2017.Thecapacityof the interim storage for spent nuclear fuel (Clab) has recently been increased and the storage capacity is sufﬁ cient to provide for storage of all spent fuel to be produced in Swedish NPP’s over an average of 40 years of operation.

B.32.3

Radioactive waste management policy

The Swedish policy is that radioactive waste that has arisen in Sweden should be managed and disposed of in Sweden.

B.32.4

Radioactive waste management practices

Very low level short-lived waste (VLLW) may be:

-disposed of in shallow land burials that are licensed according to the Act on Nuclear Activities; or

-subject to clearance according to SKI and SSI requirements and decisions, and either

-released for unrestricted use;

-disposed of in municipal landﬁ lls; or

-incinerated using speciﬁ c furnaces (only applicable on contaminated oil).

Short-lived LILW is treated and packaged according to a standardised system with predeﬁ ned waste type descriptions (WTD) and disposed of in the repository for operational waste (SFR 1), in rock caverns in crystalline bedrock. WTD’s are subject to approval by SKI and SSI. The repository consists of ﬁ ve different caverns, and wastes are directed to different parts of the repository depending on, e.g. the activity content and chemical characteristics.

Long-lived LILW will be disposed of in a repository in rock caverns in crystalline bedrock. Until the repository has been constructed the long-lived waste will be stored either at the NPP, at Studsvik sites or in storage pools in the interim storage for spent nuclear fuel (Clab).

B.32.5

Criteria to deﬁ ne and categorize radioactive waste

The deﬁ nition of nuclear waste according to the Act (1984:3) on Nuclear Activities is:

-spent nuclear fuel that has been placed in a repository,

-a radioactive substance formed in a nuclear plant and which has not been produced or removed from the plant to be used for education or research, or for medical, agricultural or commercial purposes,

-materials, or other items, that have belonged to a nuclear plant and become contaminated with radioactivity, and are no longer to be used in that plant, or

-radioactive parts of a nuclear plant that is being decommissioned.

In the Radiation Protection Act (1988:220) the term ”radioactive waste” is used. The term includes radioactive waste from nuclear activities, as well as from non-nuclear activities (medical use, use of sealed sources, research institutions, consumer products, etc). The legal deﬁ nitions are discussed further in section E.19.1, and section D, in which the disposal routes for different waste streams are presented.

SECTION C – SCOPE OF APPLICATION

ARTICLE 3. SCOPE OF APPLICATION

•This Convention shall apply to the safety of spent fuel management when the spent fuel results from the operation of civilian nuclear reactors. Spent fuel held at reprocessing facilities as part of a reprocessing activity is not covered in the scope of this Convention unless the Contracting Party declares reprocessing to be part of spent fuel management.

•This Convention shall also apply to the safety of radioactive waste management when the radioactive waste results from civilian applications. However, this Convention shall not apply to waste that contains only naturally occurring radioactive materials and that does not originate from the nuclear fuel cycle, unless it constitutes a disused sealed source or it is declared as radioactive waste for the purposes of this Convention by the Contracting Party.

•This Convention shall not apply to the safety of management of spent fuel or radioactive waste within military or defence programmes, unless declared as spent fuel or radioactive waste for the purposes of this Convention by the Contracting Party. However, this Convention shall apply to the safety of management of spent fuel and radioactive waste from military or defence programmes if and when such materials are transferred permanently to and managed within exclusively civilian programmes.

C.3 SCOPE

C.3.1

Reprocessing and military or defence programmes

Reprocessing is not part of the nuclear fuel cycle in Sweden. There is no reprocessing facility in Sweden and spent fuel from nuclear power reactors is not sent for reprocessing in other countries. Reprocessing agreements were made with United Kingdom Atomic Energy Agency (now the British Nuclear Fuel Limited, BNFL) in 1969 and Compagnie Générale des Matières Nucléaires (COGEMA) for reprocessing spent nuclear fuel from civilian nuclear power plants. Only a small number of fuel elements were in fact shipped for reprocessing and the agreements were terminated in the early 1980’s. These past practices are discussed further in Section H.

Sweden terminated all research activities related to military or defence programmes in 1970, and all radioactive residues from activities involving nuclear technology are since then part of the civilian sector. Radioactive waste from research activities related to military or defence programmes, before 1970, has been permanently transferred to the management programme for civilian radioactive waste. These past practices are further discussed in Section H.

Sweden declares all spent fuel and all radioactive waste originating from the nuclear fuel cycle for the purpose of the Joint Convention, pursuant to Article 3, paragraph 1 and 3.

C.3.2

Naturally occurring radioactive materials

Sweden does not declare waste that contains only naturally occurring radioactive material and that does not originate from the nuclear fuel cycle as radioactive waste for the purpose of the Joint Convention, pursuant to Article 3, paragraph 2.

SECTION D – INVENTORIES AND LISTS

ARTICLE 32. REPORTING

2.This report shall also include:

(i)a list of the spent fuel management facilities subject to this Convention, their location, main purpose and essential features;

(ii)an inventory of spent fuel that is subject to this Convention and that is being held in storage and of that which has been disposed of. This inventory shall contain a description of the material and, if available, give information on its mass and its total activity;

(iii)a list of the radioactive waste management facilities subject to this Convention, their location, main purpose and essential features;

(iv)an inventory of radioactive waste that is subject to this Convention that:

(a)is being held in storage at radioactive waste management and nuclear fuel cycle facilities;

(b)has been disposed of; or

(c)has resulted from past practices.

Thisinventoryshallcontainadescriptionof thematerialandotherappropriateinformationavailable, such as volume or mass, activity and speciﬁ c radionuclides;

(v)a list of nuclear facilities in the process of being decommissioned and the status of decommissioning activities at those facilities.

D.32	INVENTORIES AND LISTS
D.32.1	Management of spent nuclear fuel

Most spent nuclear fuel in Sweden emanates from commercial nuclear power plants at the Barsebäck (which was ﬁ nally shut down 31 May 2005), Forsmark, Oskarshamn and Ringhals sites. Small amounts of spent nuclear fuel originate from the research reactors in Studsvik (which were ﬁ nally shut down 15 June 2005). In addition, some spent nuclear fuel from the decommissioned research reactor R1and from the closed Ågesta reactor must be managed.

Spent nuclear fuel from the NPPs is temporarily stored in fuel pools, before being transported to the central interim storage for spent nuclear fuel (Clab), where it will be stored for at least another 30 years before being encapsulated and deposited in a repository.

SpentnuclearfuelfromtherecentlyclosedresearchreactorsR2andR2-0inStudsvikistemporarilystored on site before being exported to the United States.

All spent fuel from the Ågesta reactor has been transferred to Clab.

Spent nuclear fuel from the research reactor R1 is stored temporarily in Studsvik, pending a ﬁ nal solution. The fuel consists of rods of metallic uranium enclosed in an aluminium alloy casing. This type of fuel is not suitable for disposal in accordance with the KBS-3 method. Current plans for treatment involves export for reprocessing abroad, and manufacturing and import of MOX fuel to be used in Swedish NPPs.

No spent nuclear fuel is currently disposed of in Sweden.

D.32.2	Spent nuclear fuel facilities and inventories
D.32.2.1	Interim storage at the nuclear power plants

Each NPP unit has a fuel pool, close to the reactor vessel, in which spent fuel is stored temporarily for at least nine months before being transported to Clab. The fuel pools constitute integrated parts of the reactor facilities, and are for the purpose of the Joint Convention not considered to be separate spent fuel management facilities. The amount of spent fuel stored in pools at the nuclear power stations as of 2004-12-31 is presented below. The pool capacity listed corresponds to the storage capacity dedicated for spent fuel. The pools also have space for the plundered reactor core, fresh fuel, scrap and boxes.

Fuel pool	Pool capacity	Spent nuclear fuel stored 2004-12-31
at NPP	(no of fuel assembly positions)	(no of assemblies)	(tonnes)

Barsebäck 2	644	175	29
Oskarshamn 1	894	277	47
Oskarshamn 2	935	362	61
Oskarshamn 3	918	306	50
Forsmark 1	602	564	101
Forsmark 2	491	471	81
Forsmark 3	301	258	63
Ringhals 1	644	454	77
Ringhals 2	260	166	71
Ringhals 3	212	193	84
Ringhals 4	190	161	70

Table D1: Inventory of spent fuel in NPP pools.

D.32.2.2

Spent nuclear fuel facilities and inventories at Studsvik

Asdescribedabove,spentfuelfromtheresearchreactorsR1,R2andR2-0istemporarilystoredonsitebefore being exported to the United States.

The fuel pool at the R2 and R2-0 reactors constitutes an integrated part of the reactor facility, and is for the purpose of the Joint Convention not considered to be a separate spent fuel management facility.

	Spent nuclear fuel in storage 2004-12-31		Table D2:
Origin	(no of assemblies)	(kg)	Spent fuel from the research
R2, R2-0	111	181	reactors R1, R2 and R2-0
R1	209	4 796	temporarily stored in Studsvik.

D.32.2.3 The central interim storage for spent nuclear fuel, Clab

Spent fuel assemblies will, as mentioned above, be stored at the Clab facility for at least 30 years. The main reason being to permit the heat generation to decay by about 90 % before encapsulation and disposal. Other highly radioactive components such as control rods from reactors are also stored in Clab awaiting disposal.

Clab is situated at the OKG site, on the Simpevarp peninsula, and was taken into operation in 1985. Approximately 100 people work at the facility, half of them with the day-to-day operation and the others with radiation protection, chemical sampling, maintenance and repairs. The licence holder for Clab, SKB, has made an agreement with the operating organisation for the OKG NPPs, to operate Clab. Thus, the operating organisation of Clab is fully integrated with the management system and organisation of OKG. However, the board of SKB has decided that SKB will take over operation of Clab as of autumn 2006 (see also section F.21.2).

Clab consists of two parts, one building above ground for unloading spent fuel assemblies from transport casks, and one underground part for storage with a rock cover of about 25–30 meters. Clab has recently been expanded and the storage capacity has been increased from 5 000 to 8 000 tons. The storage part consists of two caverns approximately 120 metres long, each containing ﬁ ve storage pools. The facility is schematically illustrated in ﬁ gure D1.

Afterbeingremovedfromthecaskinanunloadingpool,thespentfuelassembliesaretransferredtostorage canisters for subsequent transport and storage. A water-ﬁ lled elevator cage takes the storage canister down to the storage section where it is placed in a predetermined position in a storage pool. Thus, unloading and all subsequent handling of spent fuel assemblies are performed under water using hydraulic machines.

The water, which circulates in a closed system, acts both as coolant and as an effective radiation shield, and no additional radiation protection equipment is needed. The water is circulated through ﬁ lters to keep it clean before being returned to the pools. The heat is removed in heat exchangers, cooled by seawater, in an intermediate cooling system. There are back-ups for all safety systems, and an emergency diesel-powered generator. Vital parts of the monitoring and control systems can be powered by a battery back-up system. The storage pools are designed to withstand seismic loads, and also for extreme temperature loads in case the cooling systems should fail.

		Figure D1:
		The central interim storage for spent nuclear
		fuel, Clab. The schematically illustrated pools
		in the lower left-hand corner are expected to
		be taken in service in 2005.
Principal data for Clab (including storage pools taken into service 2005)
Owner and license holder:	Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB)
Operation and maintenance:	OKG AB
Start of construction:	1980
Start of operation:	1985
Number of staff:	Approximately 100
Storage capacity:	8 000 tonnes of uranium
Receiving capacity:	300 tonnes uranium per year
Number of storage pools:	8 + 2 in reserve
Pool temperature (normal conditions):	Maximum 36°C
Cooling capacity:	8.5 MW
Inventory of spent fuel in CLAB

		Spent nuclear fuel stored 2004-12-31
Speciﬁ cation	(No of assemblies)		(tonnes)

BWR fuel		17 984	3 188
PWR fuel		2 091	984
Fuel from Ågesta district heating nuclear power reactor		222	20
Fuel from Studsvik		19	3
German MOX-.fuel (exchanged for Swedish fuel reprocessed in France)		217	23
Total		20 532	4 182

Table D3: Inventory of spent fuel stored in Clab 2004-12-31.

Figure D2: Standard packages for short-lived LILW used in Sweden.

D.32.3 Management of radioactive waste

Waste management at the NPP sites is fully integrated into the operations at each site. Fulﬁ lment of the requirements in SKI’s general regulation is accomplished and veriﬁ ed through regulatory review and inspection activities at the nuclear power plants, as reported in the Swedish reports under the Convention on Nuclear Safety. Temporary storage of

radioactive waste at the nuclear power plant sites is in practice an integrated part of the site.

Wastewithverylowactivity(VLLW) is disposed of in shallow land burials on site, except for Barsebäck.

Short-lived low and intermediate waste (LILW) from the nuclear power plants consists of ion exchange resins from ﬁ lters, metal scrap, pipes, valves, pumps, and tools and protective clothes. The waste is classified and handled initially on site, in preparation for disposal. The purpose of the waste handling at the power plants is to reducethevolume,tosolidifywetwaste in concrete or bitumen, and to pack the waste in suitable packages. Four types of standard packages are used, as well as standard ISO containers

(see ﬁ gure D2). Waste packages are stored temporarily in a buffer storage on site before being transported to the repository for operational waste, SFR.

The waste is treated differently at the different nuclear power plants. The table below describes methods and packages for operational waste produced at the nuclear power plants.

Type of waste	Ringhals	Barsebäck	Oskarshamn	Forsmark

Ion exchange resins.	Solidiﬁ ed in concrete,	Solidiﬁ ed in bitumen,	Solidiﬁ ed in concrete	Solidiﬁ ed in bitumen and
	packed in concrete	packed in steel drums.	and packed in	packed in steel drums
	moduls and steel		concrete moulds.	and steel moulds.
	moulds.
		Dewatered and packed	Dewatered and packed
		in concrete tanks.	in concrete tanks.

Metal scrap and	Casted in concrete	Packed in standard	Casted in concrete	Casted in concrete
residues.	and packed in	ISO containers.	and packed in	and packed in
	concrete moulds.		concrete moulds.	steel moulds.
	Packed in standard			Packed in standard
	ISO containers.			ISO containers.

Sludges.	Solidiﬁ ed in concrete,
	packed in
	concrete moulds.

Table D4: Waste treatment methods at the NPPs.

D.32.4	Radioactive waste management facilities and inventories
D.32.4.1	Radioactive waste management facilities at the NPP sites

AttheOKGsite,theinterimstorageforlowandintermediatelevelwasteisbuiltinarockcavern.Attheother nuclear power plants sites, there are special buildings for interim storage of conditioned operational waste located on the nuclear plant site. Safety reports exist for all facilities where radioactive waste is handled and

stored. The safety reports describe the facility and the waste handling activities, the content of radioactive substances, supervising activities and include a safety analysis. As waste packages from the NPP sites are transported to SFR on a regular basis it is not relevant for the purpose of the Joint Convention to present a list of the inventories for the interim storage at the sites.

D.32.4.2

Radioactive waste management facilities at Studsvik

Hot cell laboratory, HCL

The Hot Cell Laboratory, built in the late 1950’s, is primarily used to investigate irradiated nuclear fuel, although it is also used for studies of other types of irradiated materials. In addition, the laboratory is used for theconditioning,treatmentandencapsulationof spentfuelfragmentsinpackagessuitableforinterimstorage in other facilities. The Laboratory has seven cells with thick concrete walls, and lead windows, to protect the personnel from ionising radiation. All waste is removed from the laboratory after conditioning.

The incineration facility, HA

The facility is used for the incineration of solid low-level waste (LLW) from NPPs, hospitals, and research institutions, and from other facilities in Studsvik. The activities comprise management, radiological measurement and ﬁ nal conditioning of the waste. Ashes are stabilised in concrete for disposal or, if the waste comes from overseas, returned to the origin for further management. The current licence permits the treatment of 600 tons of combustible waste annually. The exhaust gas and ventilation systems are monitored for any radioactive substances.

The melting facility, SMA

The melting facility in Studsvik is used for volume reduction of contaminated metal scrap. After melting and radiological measurement, the material may be exempted from regulatory control or returned to the source for further management. The current licence permits the treatment of 2 500 tons of metal annually. The exhaust gas and ventilation systems are monitored for any radioactive substances.

Treatment facility for intermediate waste, HM

The facility is used for the treatment of intermediate solid and liquid waste from other facilities in Studsvik. Treatment of solid waste comprises sorting, volume reduction (compaction), packing and conditioning by means of stabilisation with concrete. Treatment of liquid waste comprises sedimentation and solidiﬁ cation by means of stabilisation with concrete. The ventilation and drainage systems are monitored for any radioactive substances.

Interim storage for low and intermediate waste, AM

The AM facility was constructed in the 1980s for the interim storage of conditioned waste from other treatment facilities from the Studsvik site. The storage is constructed in a cavern in crystalline bedrock with a rock cover of at least 20 meters. The rock mass is grouted with concrete, the walls are reinforced by means of rendering concrete, and special arrangements have been made to drain the rock.

The storage is dimensioned to receive waste until about the year 2020. The storage area is divided into two parts; one part is used for waste that requires shielding and the other is used for waste for which shielding is not necessary.

The shielded part of the AM storage has a maximum capacity corresponding to 14 400 drums of 200 litres, the unshielded part can hold 4 600 drums. A further 1 000 drums can be deposited in others parts of the storage. The waste is conditioned and packed in special containers before being positioned in the storage. The ventilation and drainage systems are monitored for any radioactive substances.

The following types of waste originating from the Studsvik facilities are currently being stored at AM:

-operational waste from the R2 reactor and the tests that are performed in the reactor,

-irradiated and contaminated material from the production of isotopes,

-irradiated and contaminated material from the fuel testing laboratory, and

-start sources from an old research reactor andoperational waste from the waste handling facilities.

Externally produced types of waste currently being stored at AM are:

-rest products from incinerated waste from nuclear power plants, hospitals and industry,

-rest products from the use of isotopes in industry and hospitals, and

-decommissioning waste from old nuclear facilities.

Number of packages	Volume (m3)	Mass (tonnes)	Activity (Bq)

1 363	7 881	14 714	4,64*1015

Table D5: Inventory of disposed radioactive waste in AM 2004-12-31.

Storage for solid intermediate waste, AT

The facility, which was built for the purpose of the temporary storage of intermediate and high level solid waste from the reactor R2, is 44 meters long, 9 meters wide and comprises a concrete slab with circular and rectangular storage positions. The walls and roof are constructed of sheet metal on a steel structure. The facility is heated by means of air conditioning and the outgoing air is ﬁ ltered. Besides a reactor core lid from the old R1 reactor, the waste in the storage is now being treated, packed and transferred to other facilities in Studsvik.

The storage facility (FA)

This facility, which contains two water pools, was built in 1965 for the interim storage of spent nuclear fuel fromtheÅgestareactor.AsallfuelfromÅgestahasbeentransferredtoClabthefacilitymaybeusedforother purposes such as storage of spent fuel from other reactors, or for storage of other radioactive materials.

The facility comprises a main building and an extension. The main activities are carried out above ground level in the main building. There are three pools; one for loading/unloading of transport casks and two for thestorageof spentfuelassemblies.Thestoragepoolsarebuiltinreinforcedconcreteandlinedwithstainless steel. They have a depth of 8.2 m, and a diameter of 3.8 m.

The basement contains service areas and equipment for management of the piping and water systems. The ventilation and drainage systems are monitored for any radioactive substances.

The extension comprises a three-storey building. The basement contains rooms for secondary service systems; the ground level contains the entrance section and dressing rooms; and the attic contains air condition and ventilation installations systems.

Storage for radioactive waste, AU

The AU facility is an interim storage for conditioned long-lived, low level, waste and is a simple, non-heated, building made of concrete and steel. The AU storage facility contains approximately 5 500 drums with historical waste consisting of ash and scrap metal embedded in concrete. During the 1990’s the waste was reconditioned. The waste will be disposed of in the repository for other long-lived waste. No more waste will be stored in the building.

D.32.4.3

Repository for radioactive operational waste (SFR)

General information

SFR is designed for the disposal of low and intermediate level radioactive waste from the Swedish nuclear power plants and Clab, and for similar waste from other industry, research and medical usage which is treated in Studsvik before being transported to SFR. SFR is situated in the northern part of Uppland, close to the Forsmark nuclear power plant. The licence holder for SFR, SKB, has made an agreement with the operating organisation for the FKA NPPs, for the operation of SFR. Thus, the operating organisation of SFR is fully integrated with the management system and organisation of FKA. Approximately 12 people work at the facility.

SFR is designed for the disposal of 90 000 m3 of waste. In the safety assessment the total radioactivity of thiswasteisassumedtobe1016Bq.Thecapacityof theexistingpartsof thefacility(SFR-1)isapproximately 63 000 m3, and 30 446 m3 of waste has already been disposed of by 2004-12-31.

The repository is designed to isolatethe waste from thebiosphere in order to avoid harmfulconsequences to man and the environment both during operation and after closure. This is accomplished by emplacement in rock under the seabed, and by the technical barriers surrounding the waste. SFR-1 consists of the Silo, the rock vault for intermediate level waste (BMA), two rock vaults for concrete tanks (1BTF, 2BTF) and the rock vault for low level waste (BLA). The storage vaults are located in the bedrock, approximately 60 m below the seabed, 1 km from the shore. The underground part of the repository is accessed through two tunnels.

The Silo

The main part of the radioactivity in the waste designated for SFR-1 is intended for disposal in the Silo. This waste comes from many different waste streams, but the most important one comprises ion exchange resins from the nuclear power plants in a concrete or bitumen matrix. Other waste like metal components of different origins is also disposed of in the Silo. The amount of organic material is kept to a minimum.

The maximum surface dose rate permitted on a package is 500 mSv/h. All handling of waste packages is performed using remote control equipment. The dominant nuclides are Co-60 and Cs-137.

The Silo consists of a cylindrical concrete construction with shafts of different sizes for waste packages. The concrete cylinder is approximately 50 m high, with a diameter of approximately 30 m, and the largest shafts measure 2.5 m by 2.5 m. The waste packages are placed in the shafts, normally in layers of four moulds or 16 drums. The spaces between the waste packages are gradually back-ﬁ lled with porous concrete. The

Figure D3: The repository for radioactive operational waste (SFR).

walls of the Silo are made of 0.8 m thick reinforced concrete. In between the walls and the surrounding rock there is a bentonite backﬁ ll, on average 1.2 m thick. The 1 m thick concrete ﬂ oor at the bottom of the Silo is placed on a layer of 90/10 sand/bentonite mixture.

According to present plans a 1 m thick concrete lid will cover the top of the Silo. The lid will after closure be covered with a thin layer of sand, a 1.5 m thick layer of sand/bentonite mixture (90/10) and the remaining space will be ﬁ lled with sand or gravel or sand stabilised with cement.

The rock vault for intermediate level waste (BMA)

The radioactivity in the waste that is disposed of in BMA is generally lower than in the waste in the Silo. The wasteinBMAcomesfrommanydifferentwastestreams.Themostimportantoneision-exchangeresinsfrom the nuclear power plants. Other waste such as metal components of various origins as well as contaminated rubbish is also disposed of in BMA.

The maximum dose rate permitted on packages is 100 mSv/h, and the radionuclide content is fairly low. BMA has been designed to handle approximately 6% of the radionuclides in SFR-1. The dominant nuclides are Co-60 and Cs-137. The waste packages are of the same type as in the Silo, i.e. moulds and drums.

The rock vault is approximately 160 m long, 19.5 m wide with a height of 16.5 m. Inside the cavern a concreteconstructionhasbeenraisedsuchthatthevaultisdividedinto15compartments.Thewaste,moulds and drums, are placed in the compartments using remote controlled equipment.

The waste is piled on top of the concrete ﬂ oor in such a way that the concrete moulds act as support for prefabricatedconcreteslabs,putinpositionassoonasthecompartmentsareﬁ lled.Itisalsopossibletoback- ﬁ ll the void between the waste packages in a compartment. Finally a layer of concrete will be cast on top of the lid. Between the concrete structure and the rock wall there is a 2 m wide space, which will be ﬁ lled with

sand before closure. The space above the concrete structure may be left unﬁ lled, but could also be backﬁ lled. Plugs will be placed in the two entrances to the vault when the repository is closed.

The rock vaults for concrete tanks (BTF)

In SFR-1 there are two rock vaults for concrete tanks, 1BTF and 2BTF. The waste in 1BTF mainly consists of drums containing ash and concrete tanks containing ion-exchange resins and ﬁ lter parts, whereas the waste in 2BTF consists of only the latter. Moreover, some large components of metal e.g. steam separators or rector vessel lids may be disposed of in the caverns.

The maximum dose rate permitted on packages is 10 mSv/h. The radionuclide content is fairly low, and the dominant nuclides are Co-60 and Cs-137. The rock vaults are approximately 160 m long, 14.8 m wide with a height of 9.5 m. The concrete tanks, each 10 m3 in volume, are piled in two levels with four tanks in each row. A concrete radiation protection lid is placed on top of the pile. The space between the different tanks is backﬁ lled with concrete, and the space between the tanks and the rock wall will be ﬁ lled with, for example, sand stabilised with cement.

The rock vault for low level waste (BLA)

The waste that is disposed of in BLA – short-lived waste – is mainly low level scrap metal (iron/steel, aluminium); cellulose (e.g. wood, textile, paper), other organic materials (e.g. plastics, cables) and other waste such as insulation (e.g. rock wool) packed in standard steel containers.

The maximum dose rate permitted on the surface of the waste packages is 2 mSv/h. The radionuclide levels are low, and the dominant nuclide is Co-60. Some of the waste inside the containers is placed in steel drums and others in bales.

The rock vault cavern is approximately 160 m long, 15 m wide with a height of 12.5 m. The cavern is very simpleindesign,basicallythereisonlyaconcreteﬂ ooronwhichcontainersareplaced.Duringtheoperational phase a ceiling has been placed above the waste in order to minimise water dripping onto the waste. This inner roof will be dismantled before the repository is closed.

The containers are piled three high in rows of two. Most of the containers are half height allowing six to a pile. No backﬁ lling is planned.

Principal data on SFR-1
Owner and license holder:		Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co (SKB)
Operation and maintenance:		FKA AB
Start of construction:		1983
Start of operation:		1988
Number of staff:		Approximately 12
Storage capacity,( total):		63 000 m3
Silo		Short lived LILW, max dose rate 500 mSv/h
BMA		Short lived LILW, max dose rate 100 mSv/h
1 BTF		Short lived LILW, max dose rate 10 mSv/h
2 BTF		Short lived LILW, max dose rate 10 mSv/h
BLA		Short lived LLW, max dose rate 2 mSv/h
Disposal capacity:		6 000 m3/year
Current disposal rate:		1 000 - 1 500 m3/year
Inventories of disposed radioactive waste in SFR

		Waste disposed of in SFR 2004-12-31
Storage section	Number of packages		Volume (m3)	Activity (Bq)

Silo		4 112	4 701	4,2*1014
BMA		9 920	8 950	1,2*1014
1 BTF		4 661	2 226	1,2*1012
2 BTF		611	6 110	1,7*1013
Steam separators		18		4,4*1012
BLA		377	8 460	4,6*1011
SFR total		19 681	30 446	5,7*1014

Table D6: Inventories of disposed radioactive waste in SFR 2004-12-31.

Figure D4: Nuclide speciﬁ c inventory for most common isotopes in SFR-1.

D.32.4.4

Shallow land burial

The nuclear power plants at Ringhals, Forsmark and Oskarshamn as well as the Studsvik site have shallow land burial facilities for short-lived very low-level waste (<300 kBq/kg). When licensing the shallow land

Oskarshamn’s design

Protective layer

Drainage layer		Inﬁ ltration bed

Drainage material

Bentonite and plastic liner

Bentonite liner

Figure D5 A: Principle section of a shallow land burial at OKG.

burial facilities, the main criterion has been that the releases of radionuclides from the facilities shall not contribute signiﬁ cantly to the releases from the already existing nuclear facilities at the site. Therefore, the total acti- vitycontenthasbeenlimitedto100–300GBq perfacility.Thehighestlevelaccordingtothe legislation is 10 TBq, of which a maximum of 10 GBq may consist of alpha-active substances. Waste is disposed of in campaigns at 3–5yearintervals,andthefacilitiesareclosed in between the campaigns.

The waste disposed of at the three

nuclear power plants consists of	low level
ion exchange resins, piping, tools, isolation
material, protective clothes and rubbish such
asplastics,paperandcables.Thepredominant
nuclides are Co-60 and Cs-137.	Figure D5 B: The shallow land burial at OKG.

At the shallow land burial in Studsvik the following waste (with the predominant nuclides Co-60, Cs-137, H-3, Eu-152 and Eu-154) has been disposed of:

-sand and gravel from decontamination activities;

-decommissioning waste from the old R1-reactor in Stockholm;

-lime from the cleaning of exhaust gases from an incineration plant;

-bricks from an old incineration plant in Studsvik; and

-metal scrap and concrete from previous and current activities in Studsvik.

Thedesignandlayoutof theshallowlandburialfacilitiesdiffersbutallfacilitieshavesealinglayersinthebottom andonthetop.Theclosedburialfacilitiesareﬁ nallycoveredwithalayerof e.g.soilthatisapproximately1meter thick. There are monitoring programmes for sampling leachate water, e.g. with respect to radionuclides.

Site		License conditions		Waste disposed of 2004-12-31
	License	Volume	Max activity/	Mass	Volume	Activity/
	period	(m3)	max alpha activity	(t)	(m3)	alpha

Forsmark (FKA)	2010	42 500	100 GBq/100 MBq	2 463	3 929	32 GBq/0.4 MBq
Oskarshamn (OKG)	2010	10 000	300 GBq/100 MBq	3 768	7 346	56 GBq/2.8 MBq
Ringhals (RAB)	2010	10 000	100 GBq/100 MBq	2 410	3 471	34 GBq/33 MBq
Studsvik	2010	1 540	100 GBq/100 MBq	683	999	30 GBq/5 MBq

Table D7: Inventories of disposed waste in shallow land burials.

D.32.4.5

Waste from fuel fabrication

Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB operates a factory for the fabrication of nuclear fuel in Västerås (approximately 100 km west of Stockholm), which has been manufacturing fuel since the mid-1960s. The annual production is approximately 400 tonnes of UO2 fuel for PWR and BWR, mostly for foreign customers.

The manufacturing process generates some slightly uranium contaminated waste in the form of sludge, ﬁ lters, protective clothing, etc. Westinghouse disposes of small amounts of waste with very low uranium content, typically ﬁ lters, at municipal landﬁ lls as permitted by the SSI. Some other waste have been sent to the company Ranstad Mineral AB where uranium is recovered and returned to the fuel fabrication process at Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB. The remaining waste from Ranstad are disposed of at municipal landﬁ lls, and at special landﬁ lls for hazardous waste in accordance with licence conditions set by SSI and SKI. Besides Westinghouse, Ranstad has customers from other countries.

Recentﬁ ndingsof slightlyelevatedconcentrationsof uraniumatamunicipallandﬁ llhaveinitiatedinvestigations by the regulatory authorities. Therefore, disposal of waste is not permitted until further notice.

D.32.5	Nuclear facilities under decommissioning
D.32.5.1	Experience from past decommissioning activities

Sweden has limited experience from decommissioning of nuclear facilities. It is limited to the decommissioning of the R1 research reactor and laboratories in Stockholm as well as some smaller test facilities and laboratories in Studsvik. The most relevant decommissioned facilities are listed below.

The research reactor R1, which was in operation between 1954 and 1970, was situated in a rock cavern in central Stockholm and was used for research and isotope production. The reactor was decommissioned between 1981 and 1983, and the site was released for unrestricted use in 1985. Virtually all waste was shipped to Studsvik. Exceptions were electric motors, handrails, stairways, etc, from non-classiﬁ ed areas that were released for unrestricted use. All waste and salvageable material produced at R1 was measured and registered. The measurements were nuclide-speciﬁ c and were done using a gamma-ray spectrometer. The graphite from the reﬂ ector was packed in steel boxes and is temporary stored in the storage facility AM at Studsvik.

The research reactor R0, a ”zero power” reactor in Studsvik, was a low power reactor, which was in operation between 1959 and 1968. The normal operational power was about 1 W, and the maximum power was 50 W. The reactor vessel was transferred to R2 (another reactor in Studsvik) for alternate usage. Some parts could not be decontaminated and were packed and stored in Studsvik. The concrete elements from the radiation shield were disposed of in a refuse disposal facility in Studsvik, since no activity could be measured.

The KRITZ-reactor was an experimental reactor in Studsvik with a maximum power of 100 W, used between 1969 and 1975. The reactor vessel was equipped with a radiation protection shield of lead. The

lead protection could, after measurements, be released from regulatory control and was sold. The reactor vessel could also be released, except for an inner tank with induced activity, which was packed and stored at the Studsvik site.

TheAlfa-laboratoryinStudsvikwasmainlyusedforstudiesonsteelusedinpressurevesselsandonirradiated fuel cladding material. The work in the laboratory started in the beginning of the 1960’s and the laboratory was in operation for about 25 years. The laboratory contained seven ventilated hot cells built of lead bricks. After decontamination some of the lead bricks and other components could be released from regulatory control,otherswerepackedinspecialpackagesforinterimstorage.Thebuildingwasreleasedforunrestricted use in 1985.

The Van de Graaff laboratory in Studsvik was used for neutron physics experiments between 1962 and 1989. The building was not classiﬁ ed as a nuclear facility but later it was found to be contaminated with tritium. An extensive measuring program was performed to identify the contaminated material and surfaces. After decontamination the building was released from regulatory control and demolished in 1999. Three drums and one steel box with tritium contaminated waste is now stored in the interim storage, AM. Non-radioactive waste, classiﬁ ed as hazardous, was separated and transported to SAKAB, a company managing non-radio- active hazardous waste.

A general observation concerning the above activities is that – despite the lack of regulations regarding decommissioning – the activities were performed without any accidents, due to the knowledge about regulations on transport and handling, and experience from radiological work of the people involved.

D.32.5.2

Nuclear facilities currently under decommissioning

ThenuclearpowerunitBarsebäck1,which was closed in November 1999, was the ﬁ rst commercial nuclear power unit to be permanently taken out of operation in Sweden. The Government decided that the reactor should be shut down as part of the policy to phase out nuclear power in Sweden. All spent fuel has been transferred to the central interim storage for spent fuel (Clab). Already before the unit was shut down the regulatory authorities increased their control and review activities at the site to ensure that there would be no decline in the safety work. Detailed planning for decommissioning is underway and is being closely monitored by the regulatory bodies. The actual decommissioning work will not commence until the second unit at the site, Barsebäck 2, has also been permanently shut down. According to current plans, large scale dismantling and demolishing work will begin not sooner than 10–15 years from now.

The nuclear power unit Barsebäck 2 was ﬁ nally shut down on May 31, 2005. As was the case for Barsebäck 1 the Government decided that the reactor should be shut down as part of the policy to phase out nuclear power in Sweden. SKI increased the monitoring activities at the site as soon as the Government announced its decision that the unit be closed down, and is closely following the developments at the site. Spent fuel will be stored in the fuel pool at the unit at least until the end of 2006 before being transported to Clab. According to current plans, large scale dismantling and demolishing work will begin not sooner than 10–15 years from now.

The Ågesta district heating nuclear power reactor (heavy water) was operated between 1964 and 1974 supplying parts of the Stockholm suburb Farsta with heated water. The reactor is now shut down in such a manner that it is not possible to start it up again. The fuel from the reactor has been transferred to Clab for interim storage. The heavy water has been removed and two, out of four, steam generators have been dismantled, but otherwise the facility is more or less intact. Detailed planning for its decommissioning is underway and is being closely monitored by the regulatory bodies.

Thecentralactivelaboratory(ACL)inStudsvikwasbuiltbetween1959and1963withthepurposetobeusedas a research facility for reprocessing spent fuel. The activities in the laboratory ended in 1997, and had involved for example research on plutonium enriched fuel, plutonium analyses, material testing and test fabrication of rods with MOX-fuel. Cleaning and decontamination work was started after an extensive measurement program. According to the plans the remaining decommissioning work will be completed in 2006.

Thetankandsilofacility(TS) in Studsvik was constructed at an early stage, with the purpose of storing liquid andsemi-liquidradioactivewaste.Thefacilityisnowintheprocessof beingdecommissioned.Theremaining parts consist of two concrete silos lined with ceramic tiles.

TheresearchreactorsR2ochR2-0inStudsvikwereﬁ nallyshutdown15June2005.SKIincreasedthemonitoring activities at the site as soon as Studsvik announced the decision to ﬁ nally shut the research reactors down, and is closely following the developments at the site. The remaining spent nuclear fuel from the reactors will be returned to the United States.

SECTION E – LEGASLATIVE AND

REGULATORY SYSTEM

ARTICLE 18. IMPLEMENTING MEASURES

Each Contracting Party shall take, within the framework of its national law, the legislative, regulatory and administrative measures and other steps necessary for implementing its obligations under this Convention.

The legislative, regulatory and other measures to fulﬁ l the obligations of the Joint Convention are discussed in this report.

ARTICLE 19. LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

1.EachContractingPartyshallestablishandmaintainalegislativeandregulatoryframeworktogovern the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management.

2.This legislative and regulatory framework shall provide for:

(i)the establishment of applicable national safety requirements and regulations for radiation safety;

(ii)a system of licensing of spent fuel and radioactive waste management activities;

(iii)asystemof prohibitionof theoperationof aspentfuelorradioactivewastemanagementfacility without a licence;

(iv)a system of appropriate institutional control, regulatory inspection and documentation and reporting;

(v)the enforcement of applicable regulations and of the terms of the licences;

(vi)a clear allocation of responsibilities of the bodies involved in the different steps of spent fuel and of radioactive waste management.

3.Whenconsideringwhethertoregulateradioactivematerialsasradioactivewaste,ContractingParties shall take due account of the objectives of this Convention.

E.19	NUCLEAR SAFETY LEGISLATION AND REGULATORY FRAMEWORK

This section is divided into two parts. The ﬁ rst part (E.19.1) presents some basic information concerning deﬁ nitions within the Swedish legislative system, and presents an overview of the relevant acts. The second part (E.19.2) describes the implementation of the requirements in the regulatory review activities. Special emphasisisplacedonthelicensingsystem,prohibition,institutionalcontrol,regulatoryinspection,documentation and reporting, enforcement of regulations and terms of a licence, and a description on the allocation of responsibilities of the bodies involved.

Fundamental principles

The rationales for the management system for spent fuel and radioactive waste are based on basic principles that have been derived from extensive discussions in the Swedish parliament. The Swedish parliament has supported four basic principles for the management of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste (bill 1980/81:90, Appendix 1, p. 319, bill 1983/84:60, p. 38, bill 1997/98:145, p. 381, bill 1992/93:98, p. 29 as well as the ﬁ nal reports of the Standing Committee on Industry and Trade, 1988/89:NU31 and 1989/90:NU24):

1.The expenses for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste are to be covered by revenues from the production of energy that has resulted in these expenses.

2.The reactor owners are to safely dispose of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste.

responsibility for and supervision of the repository can be made and maintained for a considerable time. A government authority could assume responsibility for a closed repository.

These are the basic principles for the structure of the Act (1984:3) on Nuclear Activities. They are also contained in the Act (1992:1537) on the Financing of Future Expenses for Spent Nuclear Fuel. The ﬁ rst principle has been wholly incorporated into the Financing Act. The second principle has been regulated in 10–12 §§ of the Act on Nuclear Activities. The fourth principle is embodied in 5 a § second paragraph of the Act on Nuclear Activities.

Another basic prerequisite for the actual management of spent fuel is that reprocessing will not take place. Thus, spent nuclear fuel is in practice considered as, and treated as, waste, although it is not legally deﬁ ned as waste until disposed of in a repository.

Nuclear and radioactive waste

IntheAct(1984:3)onNuclearActivities,radioactivewasteproducedbynuclearactivitiesisdeﬁ nedas“nuclear waste”. The precise deﬁ nition according to the act is presented in the next section. The authority responsible according to the Nuclear Activities Act is the Swedish Nuclear Inspectorate (SKI).

In the Radiation Protection Act (1988:220) the term “radioactive waste” is used. The term includes radioactive waste from nuclear activities as well as from non-nuclear activities (medical use, use of sealed sources, research institutions, consumer products, etc). The authority responsible according to the Radiation Protection Act is the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI).

E.19.1

Legislative framework

Theframeworkof Sweden’slegislationintheﬁ eldof wastemanagement,nuclearsafetyandradiationprotection, istobefoundinﬁ veActs:theAct(1984:3)onNuclearActivities;theRadiationProtectionAct(1988:220);the Environmental Code (1998:808); the Act (1992:1537) on the Financing of Future Expenses on Spent Nuclear Fuel; and parts of the Act (2000:1064) on the Control of Dual-use Items and Technical Assistance.

The Acts are supplemented by a number of ordinances and other secondary legislation, which contain more detailed provisions for particular aspects of the legal framework.

E.19.1.1 The Act on Nuclear Activities

The Act (1984:3) on Nuclear Activities is the basic law regulating nuclear safety. It contains basic provisions concerning safety in connection with nuclear activities, and applies to the handling of nuclear material and nuclear waste as well as to the operation of nuclear plants.

The Swedish Parliament has on several occasions declared that Sweden supports and will follow the principle of every country’s responsibility to take care of and dispose of spent fuel and radioactive waste produced within the country. Disposal, as well as interim storage, of foreign spent fuel and radioactive waste in Sweden is prohibited.

A special licence may however be granted by the Government in special cases, to allow for very small amounts of foreign spent fuel or radioactive waste to be disposed of in Sweden, on condition that it does not hinder the R&D-programme regarding safe disposal of spent fuel in Sweden.

The Act does not contain provisions concerning radiation protection. This is regulated in a separate act, the Radiation Protection Act (see section E.19.1.2). As far as nuclear activities are concerned, the Radiation Protection Act and the Act on Nuclear Activities should be applied in parallel and in close association with each other.

Deﬁ nitions

The handling, transport or other dealings with nuclear waste are deﬁ ned as nuclear activity. The precise deﬁ nition of nuclear waste is:

-Spent nuclear fuel that has been placed in a repository.

-A radioactive substance formed in a nuclear plant and which has not been produced or removed from the plant to be used in education or research, or for medical, agricultural or commercial purposes.

-Materials or other items that have belonged to a nuclear plant and become contaminated with radioactivity, and are no longer to be used in such a plant.

-Radioactive parts of a nuclear plant that is being decommissioned.

Basic requirements on safety

Nuclear activities shall be conducted such that they meet safety requirements and fulﬁ l the obligations pursuant to Sweden’s agreements for the purpose of preventing the proliferation of nuclear weapons and unauthorised dealing with nuclear material and spent nuclear fuel.

Safetyinnuclearactivitiesshallbemaintainedbytakingallmeasuresrequiredtopreventerrorsinordefective functioning of equipment, to prevent incorrect handling or any other circumstances that may result in a radiological accident, and to prevent unlawful dealings with nuclear material or nuclear waste.

The Government or the authority appointed by the Government may issue more detailed provisions concerning these matters.

Licensing

In principle, all activities with nuclear material or nuclear waste are deemed to constitute nuclear activity for which a licence is required. However, nuclear waste and nuclear material with a very low level of radiation can be released from regulatory control.

General obligations of licensees and licence conditions

The licence-holder for nuclear activities shall be responsible for ensuring that all measures are taken needed for:

-maintaining safety, with reference to the nature of the activities and the conditions under which they are conducted;

-ensuring the safe handling and disposal of nuclear waste arising from the activities or nuclear material arising therein that is not reused; and

-the safe decommissioning and dismantling of plants in which nuclear activities are no longer to be conducted.

The holder of a licence for a nuclear activity has to ensure that all measures are taken that are needed to maintain safety. This is a very general obligation and it has to be complemented with licensing conditions. The licensing conditions are imposed when a licence is issued. Licensing conditions can also be imposed during the period of validity of a licence.

Environmental impact assessment and general rules of consideration

In all licensing cases according to the Act on Nuclear Activities an EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) shall be made. The Environmental Code regulates the way in which the EIA shall be performed as well as its contents. The general rules of consideration in the Environmental Code shall also be complied with in licensing cases according to the Act on Nuclear Activities (see section E.19.1.3).

Safe management and disposal of nuclear waste

The holder of a licence for conducting nuclear activities is responsible for the management and disposal of the waste produced and for decommissioning. The holder of a licence for the operation of a nuclear power reactor shall – in co-operation with the other holders of a licence for the operation of nuclear power reactors

– establish and carry out an R&D-programme for the safe handling and disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste. Every third year the programme shall be submitted to the Government, or an authority assigned by the Government, for evaluation.

According to the Ordinance on Nuclear Activities the Swedish Nuclear Inspectorate (SKI) has been assigned by the Government to be responsible for the evaluation of the R&D-programmes. As a step in the evaluation process SKI invites comments from a large number of stakeholders, such as other government organisations, municipalities, environmental organisations, research institutions, universities, etc. SSI reviews the R&D-programme with respect to radiation protection. After the review SKI draws its own conclusions and forwards the R&D-programme to the Government to make a decision, whether to approve the programme or not. In connection with the decision, the Government may issue conditions about the content of the future R&D-programme.

Supervision

TheGovernmentassignsaregulatorybodytosupervisethecompliancewiththeActonNuclearActivitiesandof conditions or regulations imposed pursuant to the Act. A licence-holder shall if the regulatory body requires it:

-submit all information and documentation necessary to execute the supervision; and

-provide access to a nuclear installation, or site for nuclear activities, investigations and tests to the extent needed for the supervision.

Theregulatorybodymaydecideonanymeasures,conditionsandprohibitionsnecessaryinindividualcasesto implement the Act on Nuclear Activities, or regulations or conditions issued as a consequence of the Act.

Inspections

See section E.19.2.3

Documentation and reporting

See section E.19.2.3

Revocation and prohibition

A licence to conduct nuclear activities may be revoked by the authority issuing the permit if:

-conditions have not been complied with in some essential respect;

-the licensee has not fulﬁ lled its obligations concerning research and development work on waste managementanddecommissioning,andthereareveryspeciﬁ creasonsfromtheviewpointof safetytorevoke the licence; or

-there are any other very speciﬁ c reasons for revocation, from the viewpoint of safety.

This means that a revocation of a licence may be decided only in cases of severe misconduct by the operator or otherwise for exceptional safety reasons. If the licence to operate a nuclear power plant is revoked, the licence holder remains responsible for waste management and decommissioning.

Sanctions

The Act on Nuclear Activities also contains rules about safeguards, sanctions, etc. Anyone who conducts nuclear activities without a licence, or disregards conditions or regulations shall be sentenced to pay a ﬁ ne, or to imprisonment for a maximum of two years. If the crime is intentional and aggravated, he shall be sentenced to imprisonment for a minimum of six months and a maximum of four years. On the other hand, liability shall not be adjudged if the crime is trivial. The police authority shall provide the assistance necessary for the supervision.

Civil liability for nuclear damage is regulated in the Atomic Liability Act (1968:45) which came into force in 1968. Sweden is one of the parties to the Paris Convention and to the Brussels Supplementary Convention on this subject. The Swedish Act reﬂ ects these agreements.

Public insight

It is considered very important to give the public insight into and information on nuclear activities. In municipalities where major nuclear facilities are located (power reactors, research reactors, facilities for manufacturing, handling, storage or disposal of nuclear material or nuclear waste) it is particularly important that the residents are given correct and reliable information. For this purpose so-called local safety boards have been established in these municipalities.

The licence-holder for a major nuclear plant is bound to allow the local safety board insight into the safety and radiation protection work at the plant. The licence-holder shall, at the request of the board:

-give the board information of the facts available and allow the board to study relevant documents; and

-give the board access to plants and sites.

The function of the boards is to obtain insight into safety and radiation protection matters and to inform the public about these. It is therefore important to point out that the board is not supposed to impose requirements on or to prescribe safety-enhancing or other measures for nuclear plants. These functions rest exclusively with the regulatory authorities.

The Ordinance on Nuclear Activities

The Ordinance on Nuclear activities (1984:14) designates the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI) as the responsible authority with regard to nuclear safety. The Ordinance on Nuclear Activities (1984:14) contains detailed provisions on such matters as deﬁ nitions, applications for licences, reviewing, evaluations and inspections.

SKI issues permits for transportation of nuclear materials and high-level waste after consultation with SSI on the radiation protection aspects. Permits for handling low and intermediate level waste are issued by SKI afterconsultationwithSSIontheradiationprotectionaspects.SKIisauthorisedtoimposelicenceconditions and to issue general regulations concerning measures to maintain the safety of nuclear activities.

Regulations on nuclear safety

SKIFS 2004:1 Regulations Concerning Safety in Certain Nuclear Facilities

SKI issued regulations concerning safety in certain nuclear facilities (SKI FS 1998:1) in 1998. These regulations have recently been updated and reissued as SKIFS 2004:1, and cover the operation of most nuclear facilities, i.e. nuclear power reactors, research or materials testing reactors, fuel fabrication plants,

facilities for handling and storage of spent nuclear fuel and facilities for handling, storage or disposal of nuclear waste. The regulations cover the following areas:

-Requirements for a quality system covering:

-documentation of guidelines for the safe operation of the facility;

-decisions of importance for the safety should be preceded by comprehensive investigations;

-competence of the personnel;

-deﬁ nitions of responsibilities and authority for different personnel categories,

-feedback of experience; and

-continuous development of safety.

-Requirements regarding the safety analysis and safety report, e.g.:

-description of the site, e.g. hydrology, geology, seismic activities, etc. ;

-design basis, including factors of importance for long-term safety;

-description of the facility and its systems, function and performance;

-source terms;

-radiation protection (in accordance with provisions issued by SSI) ; and

-description of the organisation for operational control, maintenance, quality assurance, etc.

-An up-to-date inventory of nuclear materials and nuclear waste shall be kept at all nuclear facilities.

-Repositories should be designed so that safety can be maintained without monitoring or maintenance after closure.

-The measures taken to ensure the safe handling, storage and disposal of nuclear waste shall be described in a safety report.

-If waste is generated which does not conform to the safety report, a plan for the management of this waste shall be documented and submitted to SKI.

-Decommissioning and dismantling shall be documented in a plan, which shall be submitted to SKI for approval.

Except for clariﬁ cation and a more modern language, some substantial changes have been inserted through the revision:

-The regulations have been made applicable in a graded way on all licensed nuclear facilities, no matter size or type of facility.

-A chapter on decommissioning has been added with requirements on decommissioning plan and a speciﬁ c operational safety assessment to be done as soon as a decision has been taken on ﬁ nal closure of a facility.

-Extended requirements on safety management.

-Integration of physical protection in the general safety concept.

-More stringent requirements on periodic safety review.

-More stringent requirements on periodic operability veriﬁ cation.

SKIFS 2002:1 Regulations concerning Safety in connection with the Disposal of Nuclear Material and Nuclear Waste

These regulations, in force since 2002, contain speciﬁ c requirements on design, construction, safety analysis andsafetyreportforﬁ nalrepositories,inviewof theperiodafterclosureof thefacility.Fortheperiodbefore closure, the general safety regulations updated as SKIFS 2004:1 apply.

These regulations concerning the long-term safety for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste cover speciﬁ cally:

-Qualitative requirements on the barrier system.

-Scenario deﬁ nitions and classiﬁ cations.

-Time scales for the safety assessment (as long as barrier functions are needed to isolate and/or to retard dispersion of radionuclides, but for at least 10 000 years).

-Topics to be covered in the safety report.

SKI safety regulation under way

SKIFS 2004:3 The Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate’s Regulations Physical Protection of Nuclear Facilities

These unclassiﬁ ed regulations contain requirements on:

-organisation of the physical protection;

-clearance of staff;

-tasks for the security staff;

-requirements on central alarm station;

-perimeter protection of buildings;

-protection of compartments vital for safety;

-access control for persons and vehicles;

-protection of control rooms;

-communication equipment;

-search for illegal items; and

-handling of information about the physical protection and IT security.

These regulations replace older requirements from 1975.

E.19.1.2

The Radiation Protection Act

The framework for all radiation protection is deﬁ ned in the Radiation Protection Act (1988:220) and in the Radiation Protection Ordinance (1988:293). The Act and the Ordinance entered into force in 1988. The purposeof theActistoprotectpeople,animalsandtheenvironmentagainsttheharmfuleffectsof radiation. Persons engaged in activities involving radiation are obliged to take the requisite precautionary measures. They are also responsible for the proper handling and disposal of the radioactive waste produced.

Deﬁ nitions

The Act applies to all activities involving radiation and these are deﬁ ned to include all activities involving radioactive substances or technical devices capable of generating radiation.

Consequently the Act applies to radiation from nuclear activities and to harmful radiation, ionising as well as non-ionising, from any other source (medical, industrial, research and consumer products). As far as nuclear installations are concerned, the Act and the Act on Nuclear Activities are applied in close association with each other.

The Government or the responsible authority may, in so far it does not conﬂ ict with the purpose of the act,prescribeexemptionsorcertainprovisionsconcerningradioactivesubstancesortechnicaldevisescapable of generating radiation.

Basic requirements on radiation protection

The radiation protection in Sweden is based on the International Radiation Protection Commission’s (ICRP) internationally recognised principles. These are:

•Justiﬁ cation

No activity is to be introduced until it has been shown to provide greater advantages than disadvantages to society. The basic principle of justiﬁ cation with regard to the management of nuclear and nonnuclear radioactive waste can not be questioned at this stage. The waste has been generated as a result of previous decisions.

•Optimisation

Allradiationdosestoindividuals,thenumberof exposedindividualsaswellastheprobabilityof receiving doses must be kept as low as reasonably achievable, taking into account economic and social factors. This is often called the ALARA principle (As Low As Reasonably Achievable)

•Dose limitation

The individual exposure to radiation (dose) must not exceed the established limits for the particular circumstances. The dose limit or dose constraint can be seen as a limit for optimization; thus, the individual doses must not exceed the established limits, even if the collective dose would be reduced as a result.

The Government or the authority assigned by the Government may also issue further regulations as required for protection against, or control of, radiation in the respects speciﬁ ed in the Act.

Licensing

According to the Radiation Protection Act a licence is required for the following.

-The manufacture, import, transport, sale, transfer, leasing, acquisition, possession, use, depositing or recycling of radioactive substances.

-The manufacture, import, sale, transfer, leasing, acquisition, possession, use, installation or maintenance of a technical device capable of and intended for emitting ionising radiation, or a part of such a device that is of substantial importance from the viewpoint of radiation protection.

-The manufacture, import, sale, transfer, leasing, acquisition, possession, use, installation or maintenance of technical devices, other than those referred to in the previous sub-clause, and which are capable of generating ionising radiation and for which the Government or the authority appointed by the Government has prescribed a licence requirement.

-The export of radioactive substances if a licence is not granted according to the Act (2000:1064) on the Control of Dual-use Items and Technical Assistance.

A licence according to the Radiation Protection Act is not required for activities licensed according to the Act on Nuclear Activities.

General obligations of licensees and licence conditions

Any person who conducts activities involving radiation shall, according to the nature of the activities and the conditions under which they are conducted:

-take the measures and precautions necessary to prevent or counteract injury to people and animals and damage to the environment;

-supervise and maintain the radiation protection at the site, on the premises and in other areas where radiation occurs; and

-maintain the technical devices and the measuring and radiation protection equipment used in the activities correctly.

The provision implies that all measures should be taken to improve radiation protection; it is not sufﬁ cient only to follow regulations or conditions issued by the responsible authority.

The Government or the authority assigned by the Government may also issue any further regulations required for protection against, or control of, radiation in the respects speciﬁ ed in the act.

When a licence is, or has been, issued according to the Radiation Protection Act the responsible authority may impose conditions needed for radiological protection. Such conditions can also be imposed on activities licensed within the legal frame of the Act on Nuclear Activities.

Environmental impact assessment

TheGovernmentortheresponsibleauthoritymay,inlicensingcases,prescribethattheimplementermakean EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) before consent is given. Such an EIA shall be made in accordance with the rules in the Environmental Code (see section E.19.1.3).

Supervision

The Government assigns a regulatory body to supervise compliance with the Radiation Protection Act and licences and conditions issued in accordance with the Act. The regulatory body may decide on all measures necessaryandallconditionsandprohibitionsrequiredinindividualcasestoimplementtheAct,orregulations or conditions issued as a consequence of the Act.

Attherequestof theresponsibleauthority,anyonewhoconductsactivitiesinvolvingradiationshallsubmit the information and provide the documents required for its supervision. The authority should also be given access to the installation or site where the activities are conducted, for investigations and sampling, to the extent required for its supervision.

Inspections

See section E.19.2.3

Documentation and reporting

See section E.19.2.3

Revocation and prohibition

AlicenceundertheRadiationProtectionActmayberevokedif regulationsorconditionsimposedpursuantto the Act have been violated in a signiﬁ cant respect or there are otherwise very strong reasons for revocation.

FurthermoretheGovernmentortheauthorityappointedbytheGovernmentmayissueprohibitionsagainst e.g. the manufacture, sale, acquisition, possession or use of materials containing radioactive substances.

Sanctions

The Government and the responsible authority decide upon matters regarding licences under the Radiation Protection Act. A licence under this Act may be revoked if speciﬁ c regulations or conditions have not been complied with in any signiﬁ cant respect, or if there are other very speciﬁ c reasons.

Liability under the Act is not adjudged if responsibility for the offence may be assigned under the Penal Code or the Act on penalties for illicit trafﬁ cking. Nor is liability adjudged in the instance of a minor offence to be a trivial case. The police authority shall provide the necessary assistance for supervision.

Public information about radiation protection

According to the Ordinance with Instructions for the Radiation Protection Authority (1988:295) one of the authorities missions is to inform the society about radiation protection issues. In 2004 SSI established an education centre, which teaches courses in the area of radiation protection.

The Ordinance on Radiation Protection

The Ordinance on Radiation Protection (1988:293) designates the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI) to be the responsible authority in the area of radiation protection. The Ordinance contains detailed provisions pursuant to authorisation under the Radiation Protection Act. It stipulates that SSI may issue regulations regarding further provisions concerning general obligations, radioactive waste and prohibitions against activities with certain materials, etc.

The Ordinance on Radiation Protection also stipulates that certain provisions in the Act do not apply to very low-level radioactive materials and technical equipment emitting only low-level radiation (exemption). SSI may also issue regulations concerning the release of very low-level radioactive material.

Regulations on radiation protection

Currently there are 47 regulations in force covering all the areas in which radiation can occur. In general these requirements and regulations are in agreement with recommendations by international organisations such as IAEA, ICRP, EU. There are 15 regulations of particular interest for waste management.

SSIFS2005:01RegulationsandGeneralAdviceonthehandlingof AshesContaminatedbyCaesium-137

These regulations are applicable during the handling of ashes generated in the production of energy by forest bio fuels in incineration facilities that produce a yearly volume of 30 tons of ashes or more. The regulations contain precautionary provisions regarding the handling of ashes for different options, such as returning the ashes to the forests for nutrition, spreading the ashes on agricultural and grazing lands for nutrition, reusing the ashes as roador landﬁ ll and for the design of the ﬁ nal waste deposit site if the ashes are deposited.

SSI FS 2002:4 Regulations on the Planning Before and During Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

These regulations contain provisions concerning the planning of decommissioning of nuclear facilities in matters of importance from a radiation protection point of view. Requirements are put on decommissioning planning and other administrative measures such as documentation before and during decommissioning and reporting to the SSI at different stages of a facility’s life cycle.

SSI FS 2001:1 Regulations on the Handling of Radioactive Waste and Nuclear Waste at Nuclear Facilities

These regulations contain provisions concerning the planning and quality assurance of radioactive waste managementatnuclearfacilities,aswellasdocumentationandregistrationof radioactivewasteandreporting to the SSI.

SSI FS 2000:12 Regulations on the Protection of Human Health and the Environment from Discharges of Radioactive Substances from certain Nuclear Facilities

These are applicable to all releases of radioactive substances from nuclear facilities that are directly related to the normal operation at each facility. The limitation of releases of radioactive substances from nuclear facilities shall be based on the optimization of radiation protection and shall be achieved by using the best availabletechnique.Theoptimizationof radiationprotectionshallincludeallfacilitieslocatedwithinthesame geographically delimited area. The effective dose to an individual in the critical group of one year of releases of radioactive substances to air and water from all facilities located in the same geographically delimited area shall not exceed 0.1 millisievert (mSv).

SSI FS 2000:11 Regulations on Radiation Protection Manager at Nuclear Plants

According to these regulations a licence holder shall appoint a radiation protection manager at the facility in order to implement and look after radiation protection conditions issued by the authorities. The regulations are under revision.

SSI FS 2000:10 Regulations on Radiation Protection of Workers Exposed to Ionising Radiation at Nuclear Plants

These regulations apply to workers at nuclear plants. The work shall be performed in such a way that human exposures are limited as far as reasonably achievable, social and economical factors taken into account. For this purpose the licence-holder shall ensure that goals and needed actions for control are established and documented and that needed resources are available. The regulations are under revision.

SSI FS 1998:5 Regulations on Monitoring and Reporting of Individual Radiation Doses

These regulations apply to measurements of individual radiation doses to workers of category A working with ionising radiation and reporting of doses received to the National Dose Database.

SSI FS 1998:4 Regulations on Dose Limits at Work with Ionising Radiation

These regulations apply to the limitation of radiation doses to workers and the general public resulting from applications using ionising radiation. The regulations also apply to the protection of pregnant women who otherwise might be exposed to ionising radiation by their work.

SSI FS 1998:3 Regulations on Categorisation of Workplaces and Workers at Work with Ionising Radiation

These regulations apply to applications using ionising radiation where humans may receive radiation doses.

SSI FS 1998:1 Regulations on the Protection of Human Health and the Environment in connection with the Final Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel and Nuclear Waste

These regulations apply to the ﬁ nal management of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. The regulations do not apply for low-level nuclear waste landﬁ lls in accordance with 19 § of the Ordinance (1984:14) on Nuclear Activities. According to the regulations human health and the environment shall be protected from detrimental effects of ionising radiation, during the time when the various stages of the ﬁ nal management of spent nuclear fuel or nuclear waste are being implemented as well as in the future. The ﬁ nal management may not cause impacts on human health and the environment outside Sweden’s borders that are more severe than those accepted inside Sweden.

SSI FS 1997:1 Regulations on Filing at Nuclear Plants

These regulations apply to the ﬁ ling of documentation that is drawn up or received in connection with the operation of nuclear plants. Certain documentation has to be ﬁ led. If the practice ceases, the archives shall be transferred to the National Archives of Sweden.

SSI FS 1996:3 Regulations on Outside Workers at Work with Ionising Radiation

These regulations apply to outside workers of category A working within controlled areas in Sweden and when Swedish workers of category A perform similar tasks in other countries.

SSI FS 1996:2 Regulations on Clearance of Goods and Oil from Nuclear Facilities

Theseregulationssetupthelevelsforclearanceof contaminatedgoodsandoilfromnuclearfacilities.Material may be cleared for unrestricted use or for disposal as conventional non-radioactive waste. The regulations are under revision.

SSI FS 1995:4 Regulations on the Control of Shipment into or out of Sweden of Radioactive Waste

Theseregulationsdealwiththesupervisionandcontrolof shipmentsof radioactivewastebetweenEuropean Community member states and into and out of the Community.

SSI FS 1983:7 Regulations on Radioactive Waste Not Associated with Nuclear Energy

Theseregulationsapplytothehandlingof solidandliquidwastesfrommedicalcare,laboratoriesandscience. The regulations are under revision.

E.19.1.3

The Environmental Code

The objective of the Environmental Code is to promote a sustainable development and thereby ensure a healthy environment for current and future generations. The Code includes general provisions on environmental protection and applies to all activities, which are important for its objective. The Code is applicable to all kinds of environmentally hazardous activities including nuclear activities and activities involving radiation. The Code shall be applied in parallel with the Act on Nuclear Activities and the Radiation Protection Act.

TheEnvironmentalCodeissupplementedbyanumberof ordinances,whicharelaiddownbytheGovernment.

Deﬁ nitions

In the Code environmentally hazardous activities are deﬁ ned as:

-the discharge of wastewater, solid matter or gas from land, buildings or structures onto land or into water areas or groundwater;

-anyuseof land,buildingsorstructuresthatentailsariskdetrimentaltohumanhealthortheenvironment due to discharges or emissions other than those referred to in above bullet or to pollution of land, air, water areas or groundwater; or

-any use of land, buildings or structures that may be detrimental to the surroundings due to noise, vibration, light, ionising or non-ionising radiation or similar impacts.

General rules of consideration

The general rules of consideration assert some important principles that the implementer has to comply with, e.g.:

-The knowledge-principle means that the implementer must possess the knowledge that is necessary regarding the nature and scope of the activity to protect human health and the environment against damage or detriment. The responsible authority may issue regulations on the speciﬁ c knowledge the implementer needs to possess.

-The precautionary and the BAT principles mean that the implementer shall put into practice protective measures, comply with restrictions, and take any other precautions that are necessary in order to prevent, hinder or combat damage, or detriment to human health, or the environment as a result of the activity. Forthesamereason,thebestavailabletechnologyshallbeusedinconnectionwithprofessionalactivities. Such precautions shall be taken as soon as there is cause to assume that an activity may cause damage or be detrimental to human health or the environment.

-The most suitable site-principle means that activities for which land or water areas are used, a suitable site shall be selected taking into account the goals of the Environmental Code. Sites for activities shall alwaysbechoseninsuchawayastomakeitpossibletoachievetheirpurposewithaminimumof damage or detriment to human health and the environment.

-The after-treatment liability-principle means that everyone who has pursued an activity that causes damage or is detrimental to the environment shall be responsible, for restoring it to the extent deemed reasonable. The person who is liable for after-treatment shall carry out, or pay for, any after-treatment measures necessary. The general rules of consideration operate as a preventive tool, and to the principle that the risks of environmental impact should be borne by the polluter and not by the environment.

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)

The Swedish EIA legislation is in accordance with the Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985, amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997, on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. An EIA shall be submitted together with an application for a permit for environmentally hazardous activities. An EIA shall also be submitted at the prospect of the decommissioning of nuclear facilities.

The purpose of an EIA is to establish and describe the direct and indirect impacts of a planned activity, or measure, on people, animals, plants, land, water, the air, the climate, the landscape and the cultural environment, on the management of land, water and the physical environment in general, and on the management of materials, raw materials and energy. Another purpose is to enable an overall assessment to be made of this impact on human health and the environment.

An environmental impact statement shall contain the following information:

-a description of the activity or measure including details of its location, design and scope;

-a description of the measures being planned with a view to avoiding, mitigating or remedying adverse effects, for example action to prevent the activity or measure leading to an infringement of an environmental quality standard;

-theinformationthatisneededtoestablishandassessthemainimpactonhumanhealth,theenvironment and management of land, water and other resources that the activity or measure is likely to have;

-adescriptionof possiblealternativesitesandalternativedesigns,togetherwithastatementof thereasons why a speciﬁ c alternative was chosen and a description of the consequences if the activity or measure is not implemented; and

-a non-technical summary of the information.

Local consultation

In the EIA process the implementer shall consult the county administrative board at an early stage. They shall also consult with private individuals who are likely to be affected by the planned activity, and must do so in good time and to an appropriate extent before submitting an application for a permit and preparing the environmental impact statement. Prior to consultation, the implementer shall submit information about the location, extent, and nature of the planned activity and its anticipated environmental impact to the county administrative board and to any private individuals affected.

If the county administrative board decides that the activity or measure is likely to have a signiﬁ cant environmental impact, an environmental impact assessment procedure shall be performed. In such a procedure the person who intends to undertake the activity or measure shall consult the other government agencies, the municipalities, the citizens and the organisations that are likely to be affected. The consultation shall relate to thelocation,scope,designandenvironmentalimpactof theactivityormeasureandthecontentandstructure of the environmental impact statement.

Consultation with other countries

If an activity is likely to have a signiﬁ cant environmental impact in another country, the responsible authority as designated by the Government shall inform the responsible authority in that country about the planned activity. This is to give the country concerned and the citizens who are affected the opportunity to take part in a consultation procedure concerning the application and the environmental impact assessment. Such information shall also be supplied when another country that is likely to be exposed to a signiﬁ cant environmental impact so requests.

Licensing and licensing conditions

According to the Environmental Code, a permit or notiﬁ cation is required for environmentally hazardous activities (9 chapter). The Government has in the Ordinance (1998:899) on Environmentally Hazardous Activities and Health Protection stipulated that facilities for the treatment, storage or disposal of spent fuel, nuclear waste or radioactive waste need a permit.

The environmental court is the ﬁ rst instance for the hearing of cases concerning such activities. In addition the Government has to consider the permissibility of nuclear activities, e.g. the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste.

The Environmental Court’s judgement when granting a permit for an activity may include provisions concerning supervision, inspections and checks, safety and technical design of the activity and conditions that are necessary to prevent or limit any harmful or other detrimental impact.

Supervision

The purpose of supervision shall be to ensure compliance with the objectives of this Code and rules issued in pursuance thereof. For this purpose the supervisory authority shall supervise compliance with the provisions of the Environmental Code and rules, judgements and other decisions issued in pursuance thereof and take any measures that are necessary to ensure that faults are corrected. The County Board conducts supervision of the Governments permissibility decision and the Environmental Court’s judgement.

Sanctions

The supervisory authority may issue any injunctions and prohibitions that are necessary in individual cases to ensurecompliancewiththeprovisionsof theEnvironmentalCodeandrules,judgementsandotherdecisions issued in pursuance thereof.

E.19.1.4

The Act on the Financing of Future Expenses on Spent Nuclear Fuel

The Act (1992:1537) on the Financing of Future Expenses on Spent Nuclear Fuel is an essential part of the Swedish nuclear waste management system since it lay down the principles for the ﬁ nancing of expenses for disposal and decommissioning.

The basic requirement stipulates that the licence-holder to operate a nuclear power reactor must pay a fee per generated kWh of electricity. The size of the fee is based on a 25-year earning period per reactor. When the operating period of a reactor exceeds 25 years, a fee must be levied for future expenses for the additional spent fuel and nuclear waste produced. The fee varies from year to year and is different for each utility.

The fees are collected in the Nuclear Waste Fund, which is subject to regulatory supervision. The purpose of the Fund is to cover all expenses incurred for the safe handling and disposal of spent nuclear fuel, as well as for dismantling nuclear facilities and disposing of the decommissioning waste. The Fund must also ﬁ nance SKB’s R&D programme.

Since 1996 the nuclear power utilities must provide two forms of guarantees in addition to the fees paid to the Nuclear Waste Fund:

•Guarantee I

•Guarantee II

SKBmakestheannualestimatesforallnuclearpowerutilitiesthatformthebasisfortheregulatoryauthorities’ review as well as the basis for calculating the fee. SKI reviews the cost estimates every year. Furthermore, SKI proposes the size of the guarantee that the nuclear power utilities must make available. After its review, SKI submits a proposal for the size of the fees, and of the guarantees required, to the Government. Based on the proposal the Government sets the fee and guarantees.

The management of the Nuclear Waste Fund is the responsibility of a separate government agency, the Board of the Nuclear Waste Fund.

To date, the Nuclear Waste Fund has covered the expenses for:

-Clab;

-the transport system, i.e., the ship Sigyn, containers, special trucks, etc;

-the Canister Laboratory and the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory; and

-SKB’s research and development costs, including siting activities.

The Nuclear Waste Fund will eventually cover expenses for:

-the encapsulation of spent nuclear fuel;

-the repositories for spent nuclear fuel and long-lived low and intermediate level waste;

-the dismantling of nuclear power plants and the disposal of decommissioning waste;

-continuing research and development work; and

-the expenses for regulatory control and supervision after closure of the reactors.

Reimbursement to municipalities

According to the Act (1992:1537) and Ordinance (1981:671) on the Financing of Future Expenses for Spent NuclearFueletc.,municipalitiesthatmighthostaspentnuclearfuelornuclearwastefacility,includingarepository, are reimbursed for their own information to the public. Municipalities have been reimbursed for their information activities since the mid-1990s. The decisions concerning reimbursement are made by SKI. Currently the municipalities of Östhammar and Oskarshamn are receiving reimbursements from the Nuclear Waste Fund.

Reimbursement to environmental organisations

In 2004 the Parliament approved a new regulation in the Financing Act, which made it possible for nonproﬁ t-making organisations to apply for ﬁ nancing, for the period of 1 January 2005–31 December 2008. According to the Government’s bill (2003/04: 116) the issue of ﬁ nal disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste is one of the most complex issues in our time where science and technology meets social science and humanistic questions. The bill concludes that the complexity of the issue requires comprehensive evaluation as a basis for future decisions involving all stakeholders in the society. To get ﬁ nancing the non-proﬁ t- making organisations must have at least 2 000 members, a democratically elected board and a charter of the association, which is decided by the associations’ assembly. The decisions concerning reimbursement are made by SKI.

Considerations regarding the future of the ﬁ nancing system

A Governmental committee was appointed 2003 in order to look over the ﬁ nancing system and to suggest improvements to the Financing Act. The Committee report was submitted to the Government in December 2004. The proposals from the report are further discussed in section K.3.

E. 19.1.5 The Act (2000:1064) on the Control of Dual-use Items and Technical Assistance

The export of nuclear material and equipment is governed by the Act on the Control of Export of Dual-use Products and Technical Assistance, as well as by Council Regulation (EC) No. 1334/2000 of 22 June 2000. To obtain permission for export requires an application to be made to the Swedish National Inspectorate of Strategic Products, that makes the decision as to whether to issue the necessary permission or not. SKI has jurisdiction to decide certain cases on the export of dual-use items that are connected to nuclear activities, such as nuclear fuel.

TheActspeciﬁ es,throughreferencetotheRadiationProtectionAct,thatalicencetoexportspentnuclear fuel from Sweden cannot be given if the destination is:

-south of latitude 60 degrees south;

-a State party to the Fourth ACP-EEC Convention which is not a member of the European Union;

-a State that has forbidden the import of spent nuclear fuel; or

-a State that, in the opinion of the responsible Swedish authorities, does not have the technical, legal or administrative resources to manage the spent nuclear fuel safely.

E. 19.1.6 Other relevant acts

The Civil Protection Act

In 2003, a new act (2003:778) came into force on protection against accidents with serious potential consequences for human health and the environment. Also a new Ordinance came into force under the same title. The Act as well as the Ordinance replaces the Rescue Services Act (1986:1102) and its Ordinance that was referred to in Sweden’s ﬁ rst report to the Joint Convention.

The Civil Protection Act (2003:778) contains provisions as to how the community rescue services shall be organised and operated. According to the act, the County Administrative Board is responsible for the rescue operations in cases where the public needs protection from a radioactive release from a nuclear installation or in cases where such release seems imminent. The Act also stipulates that a rescue commander with a speciﬁ ed competence, with far-reaching authority, is to be engaged for all rescue operations. In addition the Act requires the owner of hazardous installations to take measures necessary to minimise any harm to the public or environment if an accident were to occur in the installation.

The Civil Protection Ordinance (2003:779) contains general provisions concerning emergency planning. The County Administrative Board is obliged to make a radiological emergency response plan. The Swedish Rescue Services is responsible, at the national level, for the co-ordination and supervision of the preparedness for the rescue services response to radioactive release. SKI and SSI decide on necessary measures for the nuclear installations.

The Occupational Safety and Health Act

The Occupational Safety and Health Act (1977:1160) contains requirements about the work environment and provisions on protection from accidents caused by technical equipment, dangerous materials or other work conditions. It also contains detailed rules concerning responsibility and authority with respect to occupational safety issues.

The Act on Transportation of Hazardous goods

The Act concerning the Transportation of Hazardous goods (1982:821) and the Ordinance (1982:923) on the Transportation of Hazardous goods.

E.19.2 National safety requirements and regulations

This section describes the legislative and regulatory system that has been established in Sweden comprising a system for licensing, the possibility to revoke a licence, prohibit activities, institutional control, regulatory inspection, documentation and reporting, enforcement of regulations, the terms of a licence and the clear allocation of responsibilities of the bodies involved.

E.19.2.1 Licensing

This section describes the licensing system for the treatment and disposal of spent fuel, radioactive waste, very low radioactive waste and non-nuclear radioactive waste. In this context the system of release is also mentioned.

Facilities for the management and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste

The licensing is issued in accordance to several acts with different purposes and involves a number of authorities. A general permissibility consideration has to be made as to whether to grant a permit for the activity or not. Furthermore the activity shall be approved according to aspects of nuclear safety, and the protection of human health and the environment. Finally licensing conditions are set up according to the various acts by the responsible authorities.

An important instrument during the licensing process is the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). Early consultation with private individuals likely to be affected, and with government agencies, the municipalities, and the organisations concerned, is emphasised in the Swedish EIA legislation. The consultations shall relate to the location, scope, design and the environmental impact of the activity and to the content and structure of the environmental impact statement (EIS). If an activity or measure is likely to have a signiﬁ cant environmental impact in another country, the responsible authority designated by the Government shall inform the responsible authority in that country about the planned activity or measure and give the

country concerned and the citizens who are affected the opportunity to take part in a consultation procedure concerning the application and the environmental impact assessment.

Permissibility

AccordingtotheEnvironmentalCode(1998:808)theGovernmentshallconsiderthepermissibilityof certain activities such as interim storage or the disposal of spent fuel or waste. An environmental impact statement shall be submitted for the permissibility assessment. The Environmental Court reviews an application on permissibility, which thereafter is handed over to the Government for the ﬁ nal consideration.

According to the Environmental Code the Government may only permit an activity if a municipal council has already approved it (municipal veto). But without prejudice to a municipal approval the Government may permit an activity that involves interim storage or disposal of spent fuel or waste, if the activity is of the utmost importance with regard to the national interest. However, this shall not apply where another site is considered to be more appropriate for the activity, or if an appropriate site has been designated for the activity in another municipality that is likely to approve the activity.

Licensing approval

If the Government grants permissibility, licensing approval has to be issued for the nuclear activity according to the Act on Nuclear Activities and the environmentally hazardous activity according to the Environmental Code.

The Government (or the authority appointed by the Government) grants a licence in accordance with the ActonNuclearActivities.TheapplicationisreviewedbySKIandthereafterhandedoverfortheGovernment’s decision. A permit under the Radiation Protection Act is not required for activities covered by the Act.

Finally the Environmental Court grants the licence on environmentally hazardous activities according to the Environmental Code.

SKB

prepares and submits applications, including an EIA, for permits/licences under the Environmental Code and the Nuclear Activities Act

The Environmental Court

Coordination

SKI (SSI)

•prepares the permissibility matter pursuant to the Environmental Code and holds the main hearing

•examines the matter pursuant to the Environmental Code (results in an opinion)

prepares the matter pursuant to the Nuclear Activities Act

The Municipality Council

approves or disapproves of the activity

The Environmental Court

•holds a new hearing

•issues a permit and stipulates conditions under the Environmental Code

Figure E1: Licensing procedure for nuclear facilities.

The Government

declares the	issues a licence
activity permissible	under the Nuclear
according to the	Activities Act
Environmental
Code

SKI,SSI

stipulate conditions under the Nuclear Activities Act and the Radiation Protection Act.

The conditions are stipulated in stages

Licensing conditions

Licensing conditions can be issued under the Act on Nuclear Activities, the Radiation Protection Act and the Environmental Code. This means that SKI, SSI and the Environmental Court can issue the conditions necessary from speciﬁ c aspects concerning nuclear safety, radiation protection and environmental protection. The conditions could be issued in connection with such approvals or during the period of validity of the permits.

In connection with the permissibility decision the Government could issue conditions in order to safeguard public interests, such as the labour market, trade and industry and regional politics. The implementer could e.g. be requested to pay for improvements to the roads in the area where the facility is sited.

It should be mentioned that during the last ten years there has been a development among the responsible authorities to issue general regulations instead of licensing conditions. The difference between licence conditions and general regulations is that conditions are linked to individual licences while general regulations apply to all licence-holders (provided that their activities are within the scope of the regulations). General regulations have the advantage of providing the same standards for all licenceholders and thus help in establishing an objective and unbiased regulatory framework. Furthermore, regulations are often an efﬁ cient way to handle matters that could otherwise generate a large number of individual applications.

Shallow land burials

Shallow land burial for very low-level radioactive waste from nuclear activities, is used in Sweden (the highest accepted level according to the legislation is 10 TBq, of which a maximum of 10 GBq may consist of alphaactive substances). The licensing procedures for such a repository differ from the disposal for spent fuel, in so much as there is no need for a Governmental permissibility consideration: it is sufﬁ cient with approval from the responsible authorities.

Licensing approvals

In the Act on Nuclear Activities shallow land burial for very low-level radioactive waste is deﬁ ned as nuclear activity and consequently has to be licensed according to that act. SSI is the responsible authority that grants licences for shallow land burials according to the Act on Nuclear Activities. Furthermore, a shallow land burial is deﬁ ned as an environmentally hazardous activity and has to be approved in accordance to the Environmental Code by the Environmental Court.

Licensing conditions

The responsible authorities may issue all conditions or regulations necessary with regard to aspects of safety, radiation protection and environmental protection.

Non-nuclear radioactive waste

For non-nuclear radioactive waste a licence is required according to the Radiation Protection Act and the Environmental Code.

Release

Release of nuclear materials or nuclear waste must be in accordance with the Act on Nuclear Activities by SKI, and in accordance with the Radiation Protection Act by SSI. Material may be cleared for unrestricted use, or for disposal as conventional non-radioactive waste. A licence according to the Environmental Code, as is applicable for non-radioactive waste, may be needed if material that has been ”cleared” is to be disposed of as non-radioactive waste.

E.19.2.2 Prohibition

It is prohibited to carry out nuclear activities or activities involving radiation without a permit. Any person who deliberately, or through negligence, operates an activity without the necessary permits shall be ﬁ ned or sentenced to not more than two years imprisonment. The same penalty (for unauthorised environmental activity) applies according to the Environmental Code.

E.19.2.3

Institutional control, regulatory inspection, and documentation and reporting

Institutional control

According to SSI Regulations on the Protection of Human Health and the Environment from Discharges of Radioactive Substances from certain Nuclear Facilities (SSI FS 2000:12), the licence-holder shall conduct environmental monitoring. All discharges from facilities for storage or disposal of radioactive

waste shall be monitored by a nuclide specific measuring programme. The dose to any individual in the critical group shall not exceed 0.1 mSv/y. The regulations are applicable to facilities in operation, but will be amended in due time to deal with the period following closure of a disposal facility for spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste.

SSIhasalsoissuedconditionsregardinginstitutionalcontrolof existingshallowlanddisposalfacilities.The regulations stipulate that institutional control shall continue until the radioactivity no longer is a ”signiﬁ cant” hazard to public health and the environment. The municipalities’ detailed development plans are also of importance, by providing conditions concerning the use of the land. All nuclear facilities, including shallow land disposals are within areas where detailed development plans have been established.

Regulatory inspection

In accordance with legal authorisation and the mandate deﬁ ned by the Government, SKI and SSI conduct regularinspectionsandassessmentsof theSwedishnuclearfacilitiestoascertaincompliancewithregulations and licence conditions.

The supervision of the compliance with the Act on Nuclear Activities, as well as conditions or regulations imposed under the Act, is executed by SKI. Correspondingly SSI performs supervision of compliance with the Radiation Protection Act and conditions or regulations imposed under that Act. The County Administrative Board fulﬁ ls supervision of the compliance with the Environmental Code and conditions or regulations imposed by the Code.

On request the implementer shall submit to the authority information and provide the documentation required for its supervision. The authority shall also be given access to the installation or site where the activities are conducted, for investigations and sampling, to the extent required for supervision (see also sections E.19.1.1 and E.19.1.2).

SKI practice

Over the last few years, SKI has developed its inspection practice as a result of the new general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1). These regulations have made it possible to adopt a more structured approach to inspection and safety assessment.

Topical inspection

Topical inspections are carried out with a team of experts, to assess the licensee’s compliance with relevant regulations. These inspections are documented in extensive reports covering the purpose and objectives of the inspection, observations, compliance and deviations from requirements, as well as an assessment of the magnitude and safety signiﬁ cance of the deviations, and a proposal for further regulatory action. Careful planning is needed for these inspections that is documented in an inspection plan.

Covering current plant issues

The purpose of this practice is to be generally informed about activities at the plants, to collect information about plans,thestatusof ongoingprojects,etc. Anotherpurpose isto haveapracticalpossibilityof detecting early signs of deteriorating performance. The information is used by SKI for preparation and planning of regulatory activities. Preparation and documentation is simpler than for topical inspections.

SKI Forum

Asmentionedintheﬁ rstnationalreportSKIhasdevelopedapracticecalledtheSKIForum.Thisisanannual integrated safety evaluation of each major facility supervised by SKI. The evaluation covers the status in 15 areas, such as plant safety, waste management, physical protection and safeguards. Based on all the inspections and safety assessments concerning the facility, as well as information from ”covering of current plant issues”, a general conclusion is made regarding the safety of the facility in relation to relevant requirements. The ﬁ ndings and conclusions are documented in report, which is an important tool for prioritising further regulatory activities. SKI Forum has now become an established practice at SKI and found to be most valuable for maintaining an updated picture within SKI of the safety issues of the plants, and for prioritising and planningof otherregulatoryactivities.Ithasalsoshowntobeastronginformationbasisfortopmanagement discussions between SKI and the licensees.

Special supervision

Besides the mentioned practices, SKI also has a special instrument called ”special supervision”. The use of this supervision is decided by the Director General and is applied in cases where SKI is not satisﬁ ed with the safety performance of a nuclear facility. It can also be applied for other special safety reasons, e.g. during testing operation after large plant modiﬁ cations. The special supervision regime means that inspections are made on a tighter schedule and special progress reporting is required of the licensee.

SSI practices

At SSI an internal inspection policy, decided by the Director General, deﬁ nes the following types of inspections to be performed.

System inspections

During system inspections the licence holder’s organisation, administrative routines, co-ordination within the organisation, division of responsibilities and competence are in focus. The aim of system inspections is to obtain good knowledge of the quality system within the organisation of the licence holder.

Detailed inspections

In a detailed inspection one speciﬁ c issue is in focus. A detailed inspection could e.g. be triggered by an unexpected radiological event.

Theme inspections

A theme inspection is coordinated and performed towards several licence holders, on a speciﬁ c theme (e.g. air monitoring programme at the nuclear facilities).

Joint SKI-SSI inspections

Because of the strong links between nuclear safety and radiation protection SKI and SSI must co-operate in thesupervisionof thenuclearfacilities.Usuallythetwoauthoritiesco-operateinmajorsafetyassessments,e.g. periodic safety reviews, PSR, (previously called ASAR, As Operated Safety Analysis Report), and in reviews of licensee’s applications for different plant or technical speciﬁ cation modiﬁ cations. Joint inspections are carried out occasionally.

Another area of concern is the long-term performance of repositories. Only waste packages approved by SKI and SSI may be transported to a repository. SKI and SSI have therefore set up a joint expert group to review the fulﬁ lment of requirements related to the disposal of waste packages, especially with regard to long-term performance. One important tool in the review activities is veriﬁ cation of compliance with procedures by means of inspections at the sites.

Documentation and reporting

According to the annual letters of appropriation, government decisions and ordinances, the authorities are required to submit the following reports concerning regulatory activities to the Government on a regular basis:

-In Annual Activity Reports, the authorities are required to summarise results, effects and costs of their activities, in accordance with general regulations issued by the Government and the Swedish National Audit Ofﬁ ce for such annual reports issued by all government authorities.

-SKI and SSI are required to submit a joint annual Report on the Status of Safety and Radiation Protection at the Swedish NPP’s. The central interim storage for spent nuclear fuel (Clab) and the repository for operational waste (SFR) are included in the report. The report summarises important ﬁ ndings and conclusions from operational experience and regulatory inspections and reviews, both with regard to the technical safety status of the plants and the quality of the safety work at the plants, as well as on occupational and environmental doses and other radiological data.

-Atleastonceineverytenyears,licenseesarerequiredtoperformaperiodicsafetyreview,i.e.anintegrated analysis and assessment of the safety of a facility (previously called ASAR: As operating Safety Analyses Review). The periodic safety reviews are submitted to SKI, which makes a comprehensive review and assessmentof thesubmittedreviewanditsreferences,whichisdocumentedinareviewreport(previously called SKI-ASAR). In the case of nuclear power reactors, the report is submitted to the Government.

-Every three years, SKI is required to submit a Review Report on the Nuclear Industry Research, Development and Demonstration Programme on Disposal of Spent Fuel and Nuclear Waste and the Dismantling and Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations (the SKB R&D programme). In addition to the ﬁ ndings, conclusions and recommendations as to the purposefulness and quality of the programme, the review report also proposes conditions for the future conduct of the SKB R&D programme that the Government may wish to prescribe in accordance with the Act on Nuclear Activities.

-Every year, SKI is required to submit a proposal for the fees per produced kWh to be paid by the owners of the nuclear power reactors to cover the costs for the disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste and

the dismantling and decommissioning of nuclear installations. SKI also includes a review report on the cost estimates provided by the SKB.

-SSIshallonanannualbasisreporttotheGovernmentonthelicencesgrantedconcerningexport,import or the transit of nuclear waste and the erection, possession or operation of shallow land burial sites.

-SSI also on a regular basis, in agreement with international conventions, issues reports to a number of organisations, such as UNSCEAR, OECD, IAEA, etc. The major part of that reporting is within the environmental radiation protection area but some parts also consider occupational radiation protection.

In addition to the above-mentioned reports, SKI and SSI also issue periodic reports to inform the public of major activities. Some examples are:

-A quarterly newsletter with up-to date information on regulatory activities (SKI).

-NUCLEUS, a publication reporting on research projects and results, including special reports on some long-term safety issues (SKI).

-Strålskyddsnytt (Radiation Protection News), a publication reporting on national and international radiation protection research, relating to ionising as well as non-ionising radiation (SSI).

-Both SKI and SSI have report series, where R&D results and important regulatory assessments are published. The media and the public can order all the reports published by SKI and SSI.

E.19.2.4

Enforcement of regulations and terms of licences

The authorities have extensive legal regulatory and enforcement power. As described in section E.19.2.2 concerning prohibition, a licence may be revoked for activities that do not fulﬁ l the obligations set out in the legislation. If there is an ongoing licensed activity that does not comply with regulations or terms of the licence, the supervisory authorities may issue any injunctions and prohibitions required in the speciﬁ c case to ensure compliance. Injunctions or prohibitions under the Acts may carry contingent ﬁ nes.

If a person fails to carry out a measure incumbent upon him under the Acts, under regulations or conditions issued pursuant to the Acts, or under the supervisory authority’s injunction, the authority may arrange for the measure to be taken at his expense.

E.19.2.5

Clear allocations of responsibilities of the bodies involved

The Swedish legal framework allocates a clear division of responsibilities between the bodies involved. As already mentioned, the producer of spent fuel and radioactive waste has the responsibility to safely handle and dispose of the waste produced. All necessary measures and precautions should be taken by the waste producer. The authorities independently supervise, regulate and review existing or planned activities with spent fuel and radioactive waste.

The ultimate responsibility for ensuring the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste rests with the State. According to a Government statement, the ultimate responsibility of the State ”is a matter of course” and does not need to be implemented in the legislation.

E.19.3 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 19.

ARTICLE 20. REGULATORY BODY

1.EachContractingPartyshallestablishordesignatearegulatorybodyentrustedwiththeimplementationof thelegislativeandregulatoryframeworkreferredtoinArticle19,andprovidedwithadequate authority, competence and ﬁ nancial and human resources to fulﬁ l its assigned responsibilities.

2.Each Contracting Party, in accordance with its legislative and regulatory framework, shall take the appropriate steps to ensure the effective independence of the regulatory functions from other functions where organizations are involved in both spent fuel or radioactive waste management and in their regulation

E.20	REGULATORY BODY
E.20.1	Regulatory bodies and their mandates
E.20.1.1	General introduction

The legal basis for the regulatory activities in Sweden is given in a number of documents of various types: laws, governmental ordinances, annual government letters of appropriation, and speciﬁ c governmental decisions, including speciﬁ c licensing decisions. Through government ordinances and speciﬁ c decisions, the Government delegates to the regulatory body speciﬁ ed parts of the legal authority given to the Government by the Parliament through legislation.

There are two regulatory bodies in Sweden authorized to supervise spent fuel management and radioactive waste management. They are the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI) and the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI). SKI exercises supervision in compliance with the Act on Nuclear Activities. SSI exercises supervision in compliance with the Radiation Protection Act. The County Administrative Board exercises supervision in compliance with the Environmental Code. In addition, the Swedish Rescue Services Agencyisresponsibleforevaluatingthemajoremergencypreparednessexerciseson-siteatthenuclearfacilities and off-site according to the Civil Protection Act and the Civil Protection Ordinance.

SKI and SSI are both central administrative authorities reporting to the Minister of the Environment at the Ministry of Sustainable Development. In the Swedish public administration system the central administrative authorities are quite independent within the legislation and the statutes given by the Government. An individual minister cannot, according to the Swedish Constitution, interfere in speciﬁ c administrative cases that are being handled by an administrative authority under the Government.

The ministries are small units, by comparison with ministries in most other countries. They are concerned with:

(1)preparing the Government’s bills to Parliament on budget appropriations and laws;

(2)issuing laws and regulations and general rules for the administrative authorities;

(3)international relations;

(4)appointment of higher ofﬁ cials in the administration; and

(5)certain appeals from individuals which are addressed to the Government.

The Cabinet as a whole is responsible for all governmental decisions. Although in practice a great number of routine matters are decided upon by individual ministers, and only formally conﬁ rmed by the Government, the principle of collective responsibility is reﬂ ected in all forms of government work.

SKI and SSI are both headed by a Director General appointed by the Government, normally for a period of six years. Boards chaired by the respective Director General supervise both authorities. Each Board normally consists of nine people: the Director General, members of Parliament representing the major parties, senior ofﬁ cials from other agencies, and a couple of independent specialists. The Director General of SKI is a member of the SSI Board and vice versa. The tasks of the Board are mainly to advise the Director General, but on a few issues, such as applications for appropriations and the issuing of general regulations, the Board has to make the decisions.

Every year SKI and SSI have to submit reports to the Government. These reports are submitted to the Ministry of Sustainable Development. In addition, all matters, for instance licensing issues to be decided by the Government, are sent to the Ministry.

Every year SKI and SSI also submit proposals or recommendations to the Ministry on issues that have been assigned to the authorities in the annual letters of appropriation. Often, on the basis of their practical experience,SKIandSSIpropose,intheirrespectiveﬁ elds,amendmentstolawsandregulationstobedecided upon by Parliament and the Government.

The system and means by which the Swedish Government controls the activities of government authorities were completely revised during the 1990s. Previously the activities of authorities were controlled by detailed rules for each type of activity and detailed control of each type of cost, such as salaries, foreign travel, domestic travel, etc. In the present system, the emphasis is on the objectives set by the Government for each authority, in their annual letter of appropriation, after an evaluation of the results and effects of the authority’s activities in relation to its expenditure. This evaluation shall be made in the Annual Activity Report of each authority.

There are very high requirements and expectations on both SKI and SSI regarding openness and the provision of information services to the Government, the media and the public. Most ofﬁ cial documents in Sweden are accessible to the media and to private citizens. All ﬁ les of any administrative ofﬁ ce are open to the public unless classiﬁ ed as ”secret”, according to the Freedom of the Press Act and the Secrecy Act. Reasons for secrecy could be related to military security, international relations, or the privacy of individuals concerned, should they for instance contain criminal or medical records, etc. Nobody is obliged to justify his wish to see a public document or to reveal his identity to get access to the document.

E.20.1.2 Regulatory authorities

In this section SKI and SSI will be described in relation to their missions, tasks and organizations. It should be mentioned that the ofﬁ ces of SKI and SSI are located in Stockholm, and that regulatory personnel are not stationed at any of the nuclear sites.

The Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (SKI)

The Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate’s (SKI) organization, mission and tasks emerge from the Act on Nuclear Activities (1984:3), the Ordinance on Nuclear Activities (1984:14), the Ordinance with Instructions for the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate (1988:523) and the Government’s annual letter of appropriation.

Organization

Under the Director General, SKI is organised in four Ofﬁ ces, namely:

-Ofﬁ ce of Reactor Safety (R) with departments for:

-Inspection,

-Plant Safety Assessment,

-Reactor Technology and Structural Integrity,

-Man Technology Organisation

-Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear Non-Proliferation (N)

-Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear Waste Safety (K)

-The Swedish International Co-operation Project (ICP), which administers the Swedish nuclear safety assistance and participates in the multilateral assistance to the Central and East European countries.

and ﬁ ve departments reporting directly to the Director General, namely

-Department of Communication and PR

-Department of Research

-Department of Administration

-Department of Personnel

-Department of IT

The distribution of responsibilities, authorities and tasks are regulated in detail in the SKI quality system (SKIQ) and the annual Activity Plan. The Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear Waste Safety is responsible for supervising and reviewing the current management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste. The Ofﬁ ce also reviews the development of methods for the future handling and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste and for decommissioning and dismantling of nuclear facilities.

The Office is responsible for taking initiatives for research and development regarding safety with respect to methods for the handling, storage and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste that are used now and in the future as well as methods for the decommissioning and dismantling of nuclear installations.

In addition, the Ofﬁ ce is responsible for the review of SKB’s R&D programme every three years as well as the review of the nuclear power plants’ cost estimates every year and the recommendations to the Government on the size of the fees to be paid to the Nuclear Waste Fund.

Board

Reactor Safety Committee

Safeguard Committee Director General

Research Committee

Quality Co-ordination	International	Department of
Quality Co-ordination	International	Department of
	Co-ordination	Communication and PR
		Communication and PR
		Department of Research

		Department of Administration
		Department of Administration

		Department of Personnel

		Department of IT

Ofﬁ ce of

Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear Non-

Ofﬁ ce of

International

Reactor Safety

Proliferation

Nuclear Waste Safety

Co-operation

Programme (ICP)

Ofﬁ ce Co-ordination

Department of Inspection

Department of Plant Safety Assessment

Department of Reactor Technology and Structural Integrity

Figure E2:

Department of Man Technology Organization

The SKI organisation.

Mission and tasks

SKI has established the following goals for the regulatory activities:

-That Swedish nuclear installations shall have satisfactory protection in several barriers to prevent serious accidents and incidents originating in technology, organization or competence, and which also prevent or reduce the dispersion of radioactive substances to the environment if an accident were to occur.

-That nuclear installations and nuclear material under Swedish law shall have sufﬁ cient protection against terrorist attacks, sabotage and theft.

-ThattheSwedishGovernment,incooperationwithauthorizedinternationalcontrolorganizations,shall have full information and control of the possession, use of and trade of nuclear material and nuclear technologyunderSwedishjurisdiction,insuchawaythatthenuclearmaterialandthenucleartechnology are not used contrary to Swedish law and Swedish international non proliferation obligations.

-That disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste shall be carried out in such a manner that potential leakage of radioactivesubstancestotheenvironmentoverdifferenttimescalescanbeexpectedtobebelowtolerablelimits, so that coming generations are not exposed to larger risks for health and environment than is tolerated today.

-That the nuclear industry shall conduct a comprehensive and appropriate research and development programme so that safe handling and disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste is accomplished.

-That methods will be in place for decommissioning and dismantling nuclear installations, and that suf- ﬁ cient funds are built up for the future ﬁ nancing of this.

-That decision makers and the public shall be well informed about nuclear risks and safety, and about the handling and disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste.

-That an active contribution shall be made to the development and strengthening of the international nuclear safety and non proliferation work, especially within the EU. Sweden shall as a member of EU actively work to accomplish efﬁ cient and increasing environmental achievements in the neighbourhood of Sweden, i.e. in the Baltic region and in the Central and Eastern Europe.

Letter of appropriation from the Government

In the Government’s letter of appropriation for 2005 the following missions are given to SKI in the ﬁ eld of nuclear waste safety:

-Appropriate requirements

SKI’s requirements shall be clearly deﬁ ned; both with regard to the technical design of facilities, and with regard to the licensee’s obligations to achieve a high quality in safety-related activities. This applies also to organisational and competence aspects. The regulations shall not have a negative impact on the licensee’s responsibilities or lead to transfer of responsibilities to the state.

-Supervision of the licensees’ responsibilities for safety

SKI shall supervise that the licensees’ have good control of safety in the facilities, and that the quality in the safety work is satisfactory.

-Promote safety improvements

SKI shall promote safety improvements, whenever justiﬁ ed by operating experience, or research and development, at the licensee’s facilities and in international co-operation.

-Maintain and develop competence and knowledge

SKIshallpromotethemaintenanceanddevelopmentof nationalcompetenceinnuclearsafety.Furthermore, SKI shall develop the supervision and promote safety through research and feedback of experiences.

-Active information, reporting and insight

SKI shall issue regular reports on the safety in the facilities and the quality in the licensees’ safety-related work, and, in general, actively communicate on circumstances and events within SKI’s responsibilities.

Similar missions are given to SKI also for reactor and nuclear materials safety, and for nuclear non-proliferation. These missions given by the Government are broken down by SKI to concrete regulatory objectives, priorities and production requirements. Since 1997 this is done in a structure with missions and submissions

for the Ofﬁ ces with allocated resources and accountable leaders.

The missions are of a long term, strategic character and the submissions are annual production requirements given by the Director General. The mission structure deﬁ nes what is to be done; how it should be done in principle is regulated in SKI’s internal quality system (SKIQ). The Ofﬁ ce directors, and the Director General, according to a regular schedule evaluate the results of the submissions.

SKIQ

Over the last few years, SKI has devoted considerable effort to develop its regulatory processes and practices as a consequence of the decision taken in 1997 to develop and implement a new quality management system. This system (SKIQ) builds on the basic philosophy behind the Swedish Quality Award (similar to the EFQM model) of the Swedish Institute for Quality Development. The focus is on a systematic improvement of processes and practices. SKIQ includes four basic chapters (1–3 and 9) and 14 process descriptions:

1.The tasks and missions of SKI

2.What is SKIQ? (description of the QM-system and its application)

3.The SKI organisation, authorities and responsibilities

4.Activity planning, follow-up and reporting

5.Competence supply (recruitment and training of staff)

6.Development of the work environment

7.Document control and registering

8.General internal administration

9.Regulatory supervisionprinciples and direction (documentation of the regulatory philosophy)

10.Issuing of regulations and general recommendations

11.Safety review of licensee applications

12.Inspection and ”covering of current plant issues”

13.National non-proliferation control

14.Experience feedback of safety related events and conditions

15.Integrated assessments of safety and the control of nuclear material

16.International work

17.Research

18.Information (external and internal)

Thedocumentsareavailabletoallstaff throughtheIntranet.Thesystemconsiderablycontributestoenhance the transparency and consistency of the SKI decision making.

The Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI)

TheSwedishRadiationProtectionAuthority’s(SSI)organization,missionandtasksemanatefromtheRadiation Protection Act (1988:220), the Radiation Protection Ordinance (1988:293), the Ordinance with Instructions for the Radiation Protection Authority (1988:295) and the Government’s annual letter of appropriation.

Organisation

The SSI operates within four main areas:

-nuclear energy supervision and emergency preparedness against radiation accidents;

-general supervision;

-environmental supervision; and

-radiation protection research.

SSI is organised into four departments, see Figure E3.

Department of Occupational and Medical Exposures with programmes for:

-nuclear installations;

-industrial and research installations;

-medical installations; and

-national laboratory for ionising radiation.

Department of Waste Management and Environmental Protection with programmes for:

-installations and transport; and

-repositories and siting.

Department of Emergency Preparedness and Environmental Assessment with programmes for:

-emergency preparedness;

-natural and non-ionising radiation; and

-environmental analysis.

Department of Administration which is responsible for:

-co-ordination of research;

-economy;

-personnel;

-IT;

Figure E3:

The SSI organisation.

-legal service and registry;

-environmental management;

-supply service; and

-SSI training.

In addition to the above departments there is also the Ofﬁ ce for Information that reports directly to the Director General, and a special department for radiation protection support to the East European countries: the International Development Cooperation Department (SIUS). The latter department administers the Swedish radiation protection assistance and participates in the multilateral assistance to the Centraland East European countries. The programme is operationally independent from SSI but reports directly to the Director General.

SSI – Quality requirements

At the SSI a number of documents, approved by the Director General or heads of the departments, provides descriptions of administrative routines, work plans and guidelines in order to establish and maintain standard of quality in the work performed by the authority. Quality improvements are a continuously ongoing process with the purpose of developing and adjusting the authority’s work toward changing demands from the society.

Mission and tasks

SSI’s role in radiation protection is to issue regulations and norms and to ensure that they are adhered to through inspections, to inform, educate and give advice, and to monitor radiation levels in the environment. SSI also has a central role in the national emergency preparedness organization in the event of a radiation accident. Furthermore, SSI administers research projects with the purpose of increasing the knowledge concerning the occurrence and effects of radiation.

In the Government’s annual letter of appropriation, some areas are pointed out that should be paid particular attention. One of these areas is that spent fuel and radioactive waste shall be taken care of safely from a radiation protection point of view. Generation of radioactive waste, as well as the emission of radiation, shall asfaraspossiblebelimited.Furthermore,thedecommissioningof nuclearinstallationsshouldbeperformed in such a way that radiation doses to workers and the general public, and the radioactive waste produced, as well as the transportation of waste, are all dealt with in a safe manner from a radiological point of view.

TheInstructionforSSIidentiﬁ esanumberof specialresponsibilities.Thosedirectlyandindirectlyrelated to waste management are described below.

-Acquire detailed knowledge of the risks associated with radiation and attentively follow developments in the ﬁ elds of biological radiation effects and radiation physics.

-Have central, co-ordinating responsibility for target-orientated radiation protection research.

-Undertake target-orientated research and development in the radiation protection ﬁ eld.

-Promote the creation and observance of international standards in the radiation protection ﬁ eld.

-Betheco-ordinatingbodyforvariousradiationprotectioninterestswithinthecountryandinthatcontext co-operate with authorities and associations involved in radiation protection matters.

-Spread information about radiation protection and about radiation and its characteristics and uses.

-Maintain emergency plans for the provision of advice to the authorities responsible for protection of the population and for emergency services concerning the radiation protection required if an accident should occur in nuclear technology operations within or outside the country and also concerning decontamination after emissions of radioactive substances.

-Be responsible for the long-term follow-up of decontamination after emissions of radioactive substances.

-Undertake tasks concerning transport matters on shipments and supervision and control of shipments of radioactive waste.

-Maintain a national register of radiation doses that employees are subjected to or may be subjected to in connectionwithactivitiesinvolvingradiationandissuepersonaldosecontroldocuments(dosepassports) for such employees.

-Continuously evaluate the radiation exposure of the population as a whole as well as of critical groups.

The areas of high priority today for SSI are:

-operation of nuclear power plants;

-radioactive waste management;

-emergency preparedness against radiation accidents;

-medical radiation exposures;

-powerful sources of ionising radiation;

-ultra violet radiation;

-radon in dwellings;

-electric and magnetic ﬁ elds; and

-international collaboration.

A Safe Radiation Environment – an environmental quality objective

TheSwedishParliamentdecidedinNovember2001onobjectives,measuresandstrategiesaimedatachieving ﬁ fteen environmental quality objectives described in the Government’s Bill 2000/01:130. One of the environmentalqualityobjectivesisaSafeRadiationEnvironment.SSIhasthemainresponsibilityforformulating the goals for, and co-ordinating, the follow-up of the objectives, which includes activities for both ionising and non-ionising radiation.

SSI is responsible for a programme for the environmental monitoring of radiation, both as emissions and local sources, and their inﬂ uence on human beings and the environment. The environmental monitoring programme will become a valuable tool for supervision and research, and also for the national radiation protection preparedness.

Government ﬁ nancing supporting progress towards a Safe Radiation Environment has so far focused on support for a national environmental monitoring programme, and for educating the public on the harmful effects of too much exposure to ultraviolet radiation from the sun.

E.20.2	Human and ﬁ nancial resources
E.20.2.1	Human resources

Currently SKI has a staff of 125 (2004). Of these, 14 belong to the Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear Waste Safety. With the exception of the administrative personnel, most of the SKI staff is comprised of professional scientists or engineers; seven persons have qualiﬁ ed behavioural science training. In 2004 the distribution in educational backgrounds was the following:

Level	Women	Men	Total

Post graduate degree (lic, PhD)	4	20	24
Bachelor, master	30	41	71
Secondary high school	18	10	28
Other education	1	1	2
Total	53	72	125

Table E1: The educational level of the SKI staff 2004.

At SSI 118 persons are employed (2004). Of these approximately 25 are occupied with matters in direct connection to the radioactive waste. Most of the staff is engineers and scientists in the area of physics and radiation physics. There are also physicians, biologists, lawyers, communication experts and administrative personnel. The distribution of education background in 2004 can be seen in table E2.

Level	Women	Men	Total

Post graduate degree (lic, PhD)	8	19	27
Bachelor, master	31	26	57
Secondary high school	10	10	20
Other education	7	7	14
Total	56	62	118

Table E2: The educational level of the SSI staff 2004.

SKI and SSI have on average a higher level of education than other public and private administrative organizations in Sweden. The staffs of both authorities have a high level of technical and scientiﬁ c competence, andenjoyhighinternationalesteem.About20%of thestaffshavepost-graduatedegrees,andmorethanhalf of the staffs have graduated from university. In 2004 the average length of employment at SKI was ten years, and about 35 % of the staff had been employed for more than 10 years. The average length of employment at SSI is 13 years (2004), and almost half of the staff has been employed for more than 10 years.

Due to a large number of employees retiring in the coming decade at both authorities, concerns have been raised whether this might lead to a loss of adequate competence in the areas of safety and radiation protection. In 2003 a governmental committee stated that it will be taken well care of when it comes to safety issues, as SKI has both a mandate to promote research and education and the ﬁ nancial means to support research and higher education in this ﬁ eld. However, the committee pointed out that the situation in the radiation protection ﬁ eld is rather distressing. Therefore the government has appointed SSI to investigate the situation concerning national radiation protection competence. SSI is presently doing so and will report on the situation by the end of 2005 and also give suggestions on possible measures to be taken.

As both authorities are knowledge-based organizations, relatively large resources have to be spent on personnel development, in order to maintain and develop competence. About 10 % of the working time is allocated to the development of individual competence.

Both authorities have one inspector per site designated as site-responsible, and who serves as the main contact person between the facility and the authority. The SSI inspectors are mainly concerned with occupational radiation protection, environmental monitoring and waste management related activities.

Internationally the numbers of regulatory staff at SKI and SSI are quite small for the size of the nuclear programme in Sweden. Each professional staff member is typically involved in several tasks, for instance inspections, regulatory reviews and approval tasks, revision of regulations, handling of research contracts and participation in public information activities, each requiring his or her expertise.

Experience during the recent years has shown that the staffs are sufﬁ cient to carry out normal routine regulatory work. However, as soon as some major event occurs requiring a mobilisation of investigation and assessment resources, the number of staff is not sufﬁ cient to handle also the regular and more longterm issues without delays. For instance revision and development of regulations, as well as research, staff training programmes and the development of the internal quality assurance system are often delayed under such circumstances.

E.20.2.2 Financial resources

The SKI and SSI regulatory activities are ﬁ nanced as part of the state budget. The Government considers proposals from the two authorities for activities during the next ﬁ nancial year, in the same way as for other agencies. The Government evaluates proposed activities, and the result of the evaluation is presented in the budget bill. Resources are allocated in the Government’s letter of appropriation, prescribing in addition directives for the activities.

Contrary to what is normal for state budget ﬁ nanced agencies, the costs for the regulatory activities have a neutral impact on the state budget. The costs are paid by the nuclear facilities to the Government as regulatory, research and emergency preparedness fees.

AppropriationsavailabletoSKIandSSIshallcoveradministrationcostsandresearchcosts.Theresourcesavailable for 2004 are shown in table E3. Administration includes all costs for staff salaries and operational activities.

Appropriation	SKI total	SSI total

Administration	96 000	132 500
- Salaries	64 000	73 500
- Operational costs	32 000	59 000
Research	71 000	10 000
Total	167 000	142 500

Table E3: The SKI and SSI budgets for 2004 in kSEK.

About 80 % of the SKI administration budget covers ﬁ xed costs, such as salaries and costs for premises, telecommunications, etc. The remaining 20 % covers the variable costs, mainly travelling and consultancy costs.About60%of theresourcesareestimatedtobeusedforreactorandnuclearmaterialssafetywork;and about 5 % for information activities. The remainder is used for safeguards and nuclear waste safety work.

The research budget assigned to the Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear Waste Safety at SKI is used to contract university institutionsandconsultantcompanies,inSwedenandabroad.Itisalsousedtocontributetosomeinternational projects(organisedbyOECD/NEA,IAEAandEU).Nearlyalltheresearchcoverstheﬁ naldisposalof spent nuclear fuel. About 30 % is used for the engineered barrier system (canister and bentonite), and about the same amount for site investigation and chemistry. Safety assessment and models for radionuclide transport takes about 25 %. The remaining 15 % is used for research on cost estimates and risk communication.

In 2004, the research expenditures for the Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear Waste Safety at SKI were distributed over research programmes as shown in Table E4.

Research programme	Expenditures 2004 (kSEK)

Encapsulation of spent fuel	1 775
Bentonite and coupled processes	2 449
Site characterisation	1 551
Chemistry	2 397
Near-ﬁ eld radionuclide transport	593
Geosphere radionuclide transport	1 127
Safety Assessment methodology	1 413
Cost Estimation	983
Risk Communication	650
Other	705
Total	13 643

Table E4: Breakdown of the research budget for the Ofﬁ ce of Nuclear

Waste Safety at SKI.

The SSI research budget is used for research in all areas of radiation protection, relating to ionising radiation as well as non-ionising radiation. Approximately 40 % of the budget is used for research directly related to nuclear energy production, such as radioecology, radiation protection of power plant workers, emergency preparedness,nuclearwastematters,andquestionsrelatedtoriskperceptionandacceptanceof wastedisposal. 25 % of the budget is used for non-nuclear research, i.e. mainly medical and technical applications as well as for basic research of importance to all areas of radiation protection, mainly radiobiology.

Research programmes at SSI directly related to radioactive waste during 2004 is shown in table E5.

Research programme	Expenditures 2004 (kSEK)

Biosphere modelling	792
Regulatory guidance	195
Risk communication	225
Studies of geosphere/biosphere interface	400
Total	1 612

	Table E5: Breakdown of the research budget for the Department of Waste
	Management and Environmental Protection at SSI 2004.
E.20.3	Relations between SKI and SSI

The rational for having two regulatory bodies has been ofﬁ cially discussed on several occasions. In the Government bill of 1984 on the Act on Nuclear Activities it was stated:

”. . . A double supervisory organization may provide a greater guarantee that the problems will come to light. . . At the same time... twosupervisoryauthoritiesinthisareaimposesheavydemandsonco-operationandco-ordinationof theactivities.Some overlap of the activities of the two authorities would appear to be unavoidable. However, such overlap does not always have to be a drawback and must be accepted in view of the construction and character of the act and the careful weighing-together of safety and radiation protection aspects that must be done.”

On several occasions the Government has requested SSI and SKI to investigate and report on the possibilities of increasing and improving the co-operation on nuclear issues. In most cases the division of responsibilities is clear and straightforward, but in some cases ambiguities exist. In particular this is the case inmattersconcerningnuclearwastemanagement.Intheareaof emergencypreparednesstherearealsosome overlapping responsibilities. From time to time insufﬁ cient communication and co-operation has caused some friction between the authorities.

The possibility for overlapping responsibilities was acknowledged in the preparation of both the Act on Nuclear Activities and the Radiation Protection Act and was again conﬁ rmed in the revision of the Act on Nuclear Activities in 1991:

”The overlap is necessary in order to avoid that any safety issue fall outside of the regulatory system. Safety issues are to make sure that all different barriers, in the fuel, the reactor, the containment, transport casks, packages and storage facilities work as intended in order to prevent any harmful amounts of radiation to reach the environment. In parallel it is a radiation protection issue to prevent the radiation, which anyhow could arise during normal operation, abnormal barrier functions or accidents, to produce harmful effects on people and the environment. This means that both authorities should co-ordinate their

licensing and regulatory activities concerning the handling of nuclear material and waste, if it is not obvious from the Acts and the Ordinances how to divide the responsibility.”

Co-ordination between SKI and SSI is established in several formal ways. The Director General of SKI is a member of the SSI Board, and vice versa. Both authorities are represented on their respective research committees. Co-ordination between SKI’s and SSI’s experts exists in several ways:

-Organised consultations in connection with speciﬁ c issues. This means for example that personnel from the two authorities participate in joint regulatory assessment groups.

-Production of the joint annual report to the Government on the status of the safety and radiation protection.

-Joint review of applications for disposal of nuclear waste, with regards to the long-term safety.

A formal co-operation also exists between the emergency preparedness organizations of the two authorities, and the information service is co-ordinated in areas concerning nuclear emergencies.

In the work to develop the new general safety regulations of SKI, constructive discussions were held betweentheauthorities,andmorecleardeﬁ nitionshavebeenachievedconcerningtheregulatoryresponsibilities of the two authorities, especially concerning emergency preparedness and nuclear waste management.

E.20.4

Independence of the regulatory functions

The role of SKI and SSI is exclusively to have a regulatory function. The description in section E.19 shows the clearly established legislation, which makes it possible to establish the independent regulatory role.

E.20.5

Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste, KASAM

KASAM, the Swedish National Council for Nuclear Waste, was established in 1985, and is an independent committee attached to the Ministry of the Sustainable Development. KASAM’s mandate is to study issues relating to nuclear waste and the decommissioning of nuclear installations and to advise the government and certain authorities on these issues. The Government has authorised the Minister of Environment to appoint the Chairman and up to ten other Members. The budget of KASAM is decided by the Government and activities of KASAM are ﬁ nanced by the Nuclear Waste Fund.

Themembersareindependentexpertswithindifferentareasof importanceforthedisposalof radioactive waste, not only within technology and science but also within areas such as ethics, psychology, law and the social sciences.

According to its instructions (Dir. 1992:72), KASAM shall:

-present a report on the state of knowledge in the nuclear waste area every third year (the latest report was issued in 2004);

-present an independent review of the research and development programme for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel which the nuclear power utilities prepare once every three years; and

-act as an advisory committee – upon request – to SKI and SSI on matters connected with nuclear waste and the decommissioning of nuclear power plants.

Besides technical seminars, KASAM also arranges seminars with the aim of opening up a dialogue between different interest groups that are seriously interested in nuclear waste-related issues.

E.20.6 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 20.

SECTION F – OTHER GENERAL SAFETY PROVISIONS

ARTICLE 21. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LICENCE HOLDER

1.Each Contracting Party shall ensure that prime responsibility for the safety of spent fuel or radioactive waste management rests with the holder of the relevant licence and shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that each such licence holder meets its responsibility.

2.If there is no such licence holder or other responsible party, the responsibility rests with the Contracting Party which has jurisdiction over the spent fuel or over the radioactive waste.

F.21.	RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LICENCE HOLDER
F.21.1	The legal requirements
F.21.1.1	The prime responsibility

The Act on Nuclear Activities is very clear about the prime responsibility for safety.

10 § of the Act speciﬁ es that the holder of a licence shall be responsible for ensuring that all measures are taken which are needed for:

-maintaining safety, with reference to the nature of the activities and conditions in which they are conducted,

-ensuringthesafehandlingof theﬁ naldisposalof nuclearwastearisingintheactivitiesornuclearmaterial arising therein and not reused, and

-the safe decommissioning and dismantling of plants in which nuclear activities are no longer to be conducted. SKI’s updated safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) further clarify this responsibility through strong provisions on safety management, design and construction, safety analysis and review, operations, nuclear materials, spent fuel and waste management as well as documentation and archiving.

The licensee’s responsibility is accordingly not limited merely to formal compliance with requirements imposed when the licence is/was granted. It is clearly pointed out in the regulations that safety shall not only be maintained but also developed continuously. Thus continuous preventive safety work is legally required, includingsafetyreassessments,analysisof eventsinthelicensee’sownandotherfacilities,analysisof relevant new safety standards and practices and research results. Any reasonable measure useful for safety shall be taken as a result of this proactive and continuous safety work.

AccordingtotheRadiationProtectionActthelicenceholderhastotakethemeasuresandprecautionsnecessarytopreventorcounteractinjurytohumanhealthandtheenvironment.Theprovisionimpliesthatallmeasures shouldbetakentoimproveradiationprotection;itisnotsufﬁ cientonlytofollowregulationsorconditionsissued bytheresponsibleauthority.TheGovernmentortheauthorityassignedbytheGovernmentmayalsoissuefurther regulations as required for protection against, or control of, radiation in the respects speciﬁ ed in the act.

In the SSI Regulations on Dose Limits at Work with Ionising Radiation (SSI FS 1998:4) limitation of radiation doses to workers and the general public at practices with ionising radiation is stipulated. Anyone who conducts a practice with ionising radiation shall ensure that the practice is justiﬁ ed by which is meant that the use of radiation gives a beneﬁ t that exceeds the estimated health detriment caused by the radiation. The radiation protection measures shall be optimised by which is meant that human exposures are as low as reasonably achievable, social and economic factors taken into account and no dose limit in these regulations is exceeded (these regulations are further explained in section F.24.1.1)

F.21.1.2

The ultimate responsibility

The State has an obvious overall responsibility for activities regulated in the Act on Nuclear Activities. Thus, the ultimate responsibility for ensuring the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste rests with the State. AccordingtoaGovernmentstatement,theﬁ nalresponsibilityof theState”isamatterof course”.Nofurther clariﬁ cation of the State responsibility is therefore considered necessary in the legislation.

F.21.2

Measures taken by the licence holders

SKB is the licensee for Clab and SFR. Clab is situated at the Oskarshamn site and personnel from OKG were heavily involved in the construction and commissioning of the facility. SKB has therefore made an agreement with OKG for operation of the facility. For similar reasons, SKB has made an agreement with FKA for the operation of SFR. The management systems for Clab are therefore fully integrated with the management system for the operation of the NPP’s at Oskarshamn, and the management system for SFR is

fully integrated with the management system for the operation of the NPP’s at Forsmark. In addition to the regulatory review of the overall management and performance of FKA and OKG, SKB reviews and audits both organisations regarding the management of Clab and SFR.

SKBhaspersonnelspeciﬁ callyassignedtoensurethattheoperationof Clabisperformedinaccordancewith the agreement with OKG, and that the performance of OKG is according to relevant regulatory requirements, especially regarding spent fuel management. Similarily, SKB has personnel speciﬁ cally assigned to ensure that operationof SFRisperformedinaccordancewiththeagreementwithFKA,andthattheperformanceof FKA is according to relevant regulatory requirements, especially regarding radioactive waste management.

As the responsible organisation for the long-term safety of SFR, SKB also reviews all NPP companies with regard to their fulﬁ lment of regulatory requirements regarding waste generation and conditioning.

The board of SKB has recently decided that SKB will take over the operation of the interim storage facility Clab.SKBexpecttotakeovertheoperationintheautumnof 2006.Oneof themainreasonsisthatSKBneeds to secure and broaden competence for operation of nuclear facilities. This is especially important with regards to the construction and future operation of the encapsulation plant and the repository for spent nuclear fuel.

F.21.3 Regulatory control

In the 1998 letter of appropriation the Government conﬁ rmed a revision of SKI’s mission and regulatory tasks, in order to make the division of roles between the regulatory authority and the licensees clearer. It was stated in the directives from the Government that it is a fundamental prerequisite for the SKI activities that the licensees have the full and undivided responsibility for safety. The basic missions of SKI are to deﬁ ne the contents of this safety responsibility, and to supervise how the licensees execute it.

For this SKI shall in particular:

-provide a clear deﬁ nition of requirements,

-check compliance with requirements by supervision focusing on processes and activities, and

-initiate safety improvements.

In the Government’s letter of appropriation (2005) for SSI it is stated that operation of activities involving radiation(e.g.nuclearactivities,wastemanagementanddecommissioning)shallbeconductedinawaythatasafe radiation protection environment could be established in relation to workers and the public. SSI shall annually report to the Government on the regulatory and research measures taken by the authority in order to estimate the need to limit the risks in the treatment and the ﬁ nal disposal of the spent fuel and radioactive waste.

F.21.3.1

Provide a clear deﬁ nition of requirements

Individual licensing conditions was replaced by general regulations in the SKI Code of Regulations (SKIFS 1998:1). These regulations, which have been updated as SKIFS 2004:1, apply to most nuclear facilities, describe principals and are functional in order not to have a negative impact on licensee responsibility. Details about the regulations are provided in section E.

F.21.3.2

Compliance check by reviewing activities focusing on processes and activities

In recent years, SKI’s review activities have focused more and more on processes and activities as it is considered the most cost-effective way to assess that the licensees have a fully satisfactory control over safety as displayed in plant and organizational processes. For this purpose the inspection instruments described in section E.19.2.4, and the assessment instruments described in section E.19.2.2 have been adapted. A prerequisite for this type of review is that SKI clearly deﬁ nes the controls necessary, in terms of licensee internal control functions, accredited third party control in some cases and, for issues of major safety signiﬁ cance, SKI review and approval. In order to implement the new regulatory strategy SKI has developed internal guidance documents within its internal quality system (SKIQ).

F.21.3.3

Initiate safety improvements

Regulatory review focusing on processes and activities means that SKI will not spend as much resources as earlier on in-depth reviews of technical issues, unless it is obviously needed in connection with licensing decisions. However, in order to identify safety improvement possibilities, it is necessary to have an extensive analysisandfeedbackof operatingexperience.Considerableimprovementsandstrengtheningof theseefforts have taken place both within SKI and the utilities.

F.21.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 21.

ARTICLE 22. HUMAN AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that:

(i)qualiﬁ ed staff are available as needed for safety-related activities during the operating lifetime of a spent fuel and a radioactive waste management facility;

(ii)adequate ﬁ nancial resources are available to support the safety of facilities for spent fuel and radioactive waste management during their operating lifetime and for decommissioning;

(iii)ﬁ nancialprovisionismadewhichwillenabletheappropriateinstitutionalcontrolsandmonitoringarrangements to be continued for the period deemed necessary following the closure of a disposal facility.

F.22	HUMAN AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES
F.22.1	Regulatory requirements
F.22.1.1	Qualiﬁ ed staff during the operation lifetime

The updated general safety regulations of SKI (SKIFS 2004:1) are speciﬁ c about the stafﬁ ng of the nuclear facilities. Long term planning is required of the licensees in order to ensure that they have enough staff with sufﬁ cient competence for all safety-related tasks. A systematic approach should be used for the deﬁ nition of the different competences needed, planning and evaluation of all safety related training. It is also a requirement that there is a balance between the use of in-house personnel and contractors for safety related tasks. The competence necessary for ordering, managing and evaluation of the results of contracted work should always exist within the organisation of a nuclear installation.

The regulations also contain provisions that the staff must be ﬁ t for their duties. This implies medical requirements and tests for drugs, etc. Such provisions have not been issued previously by SKI, but how the licensee manages the ﬁ tness for duty issues has been followed through inspections.

F.22.1.2

Adequate ﬁ nancial resources

During operation and for decommissioning

It is clear from the Swedish Act on Nuclear Activities that in order to obtain a licence, economical resources must be committed in order to manage the safety obligations mentioned in chapter 10 of the Act. Every presumptive licensee must be assessed in this respect during the licensing procedure.

Provisionforﬁ nancialresourcesduringdecommissioningisprovidedbymeansof investmentsingovernmentcontrolledfunds.LicenseesfornuclearpowerplantsmustpayafeetotheNuclearWasteFundonevery kWhproduced,accordingtotheActontheFinancingof FutureExpendituresforSpentFuel,etc(1992:1537) as described in section E.19.1.4. This is to ensure the ﬁ nancing of decommissioning, handling and disposal of spent fuel and nuclear waste, including the research needed for these activities.

The repository for radioactive operational waste (SFR) has been paid for directly by the nuclear power utilities and not by the Fund. Operational waste is not covered by the Act on the Financing of Future Expenses for Spent Nuclear Fuel etc. but is instead paid for by the nuclear power utilities at the time the waste is produced. However, ﬁ nal disposal in SFR of operational waste from Clab is paid for through the Nuclear Waste Fund, since all of Clab’s operations are ﬁ nanced by this Fund.

Provisions for institutional control and monitoring after the closure

As described in chapter F.26.1.1 the holder of a licence for nuclear activities shall be responsible for ensuring that all measures are taken that are needed for the safe decommissioning and dismantling of plants in which nuclear activities are no longer to be conducted. Institutional control and monitoring is not foreseen in the Swedish management system for spent fuel and radioactive waste. It follows that a licensee may be exempted from their responsibilities when decommissioning and dismantling has taken place and ﬁ nancial provisions for institutional control and monitoring after closure are not required.

The State has an overall responsibility for activities regulated in the Nuclear Activities Act as described in section F.21.1.2. It follows that if the need for institutional control and monitoring were to arise in the future, the State would be responsible for the arrangements and costs.

F.22.2

Measures taken by the licence holders

SKB activities are developed and new facilities will be built and put into operation. Therefore SKB needs to ensure and broaden the competence concerning the operation of nuclear facilities. SKB is currently for-

mulating, in detail, the next steps in the waste management programme where organisation, resources and competence will be taken into account. The board of SKB has decided that SKB will take over the operation of Clab, which at present is contracted out to OKG (see section F.21.2).

As described in the introduction, the nuclear power utilities have formed a jointly owned company, the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company (SKB), to fulﬁ l their obligations regarding nuclear waste management. SKB is assigned to make the annual estimates that form the basis for calculating the annual fee on every kWh produced that the licensees for nuclear power plants must pay to the Nuclear Waste Fund.

The NPP licensees also make two forms of guarantees available to the government in the event that the Nuclear Waste Fund should prove to be inadequate. The two types of guarantees serve different purposes (see section E.19.1.4).

F.22.3 Regulatory control

Qualiﬁ ed staff during operation

CompliancewiththerequirementsconcerningcompetenceassuranceinthegeneralsafetyregulationsSKIFS 1998:1 (revised as SKIFS 2004:1) was inspected in 2000 at all the nuclear power sites. These inspections showed a need for improved analysis tools, in order to deﬁ ne competence requirements, for other personnel groups than operations personnel for whom a systematic approach has been used for several years. Work was initiated within the implementing organisations at all the sites to improve the analysis tools, and was in principle completed by the end of 2002. Both Clab and SFR beneﬁ ted from these improvements as the management systems for operation those facilities are fully integrated with the management systems for the operation of the nuclear power plants at OKG and FKA respectively.

Adequate ﬁ nancial resources

SKI reviews the nuclear power utilities’ cost estimates for dismantling and ﬁ nal disposal. Furthermore, SKI reviews the size of the guarantee that the nuclear power utilities must make available to ensure that the ﬁ nancing system will be able to meet future needs. After its annual review, SKI submits a proposal for the size of the fees, and of the guarantees required, to the government.

F.22.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 22.

ARTICLE 23. QUALITY ASSURANCE

Each Contracting Party shall take the necessary steps to ensure that appropriate quality assurance programmes concerning the safety of spent fuel and radioactive waste management are established and implemented.

F.23	QUALITY ASSURANCE
F.23.1	Regulatory requirements

The updated general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) apply to the operation of all types of nuclear installations, including facilities for the treatment, storage and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste. Clab and SFR are operated by OKG and FKA respectively, and integrated in the management systems for the operation of the nuclear power plants at the sites.

The main requirements with regard to quality assurance can be summarised as follows:

-The licensee shall ensure that the activities of the facility are controlled and developed with the support of a quality system, which covers those activities which are important for safety.

-The quality system shall be kept up-to-date and be documented.

-Theapplicability,suitabilityandeffectivenessof thequalitysystemshallbesystematicallyandperiodically inspected by a quality assurance function, which shall have an independent position in relation to those activities that are to be audited.

The general recommendations to the legally binding regulations point out that in order to cover all activities important to safety, the scope of the quality system should not be too narrow. The IAEA Code and Guides forqualityassurancearementionedasguidancefordevelopingthesystem.Therecommendationsalsoaddress the integrity and independent position of the auditing function directly under the plant manager, the competence of the audit teams, the audit intervals, and that audits of the QA-function and the plant management should also be carried out by independent auditors. The regulations emphasise that the quality system must provide for the development of the plant activities and contribute to the development of safety.

F.23.2	Measures taken by the licence holders
F.23.2.1	Quality programmes

In Sweden the general description of the quality and management system is normally regarded as the plant’s most important document, as it gives an overview of the requirements and the way in which the organization is supposed to work in order to meet these demands. The documents are to be kept available for everyone in the plant organization, and also for others who are affected by the information in the documents, for instance contractors, consultants and the regulatory authorities. All documents in the quality and management system are under controlled revision, regularly or when needed, in order to reﬂ ect the actual situation at the plant at all times.

Development of quality assurance programmes at the Swedish NPPs began during the late 1970’s. These programmes have since been developed continuously over the years, and have, of course, been affected by regulations and expectations from the regulatory body and business associates. In the beginning the quality manuals of the NPPs were limited to descriptions of routines in a number of functional areas, but they lacked clear statements of the objectives and requirements. During the 1990s there has been considerable developmentof theconcept,andthequalityassuranceprogrammesof theSwedishNPPsaretodayintegrated in the total management system of every plant.

The main principles are the same for the quality and management systems of the Swedish NPPs, with documents on three levels. The ﬁ rst level (top-level) documents are issued by the plant director. Included in these are typically a vision to strive after, a business idea which outlines the mission of the facility, objectives for different areas and strategies to accomplish the objectives. Objective typically exist for:

-nuclear safety,

-occupational safety,

-economic results,

-conﬁ dence from society,

-environmental impact, and

-personnel responsibility.

A comprehensive description of the organization with responsibilities for functions and processes, division of responsibilityandmanagementprinciplesarealsoincludedinthetop-leveldocuments.Furthermore,there are policies, conditions and directives for the main activity processes at the plant. In the conditions all the legal requirements are included, as well as the plant owners’ requirements and additions. Finally the top-level documents include directives to all departments and staff units at the power plant.

The second level documents of the management system contain commitments from the responsible managers on how to work with the tasks delegated by the plant director in the top-level documents. These replies are given as objectives, directives, process descriptions and instructions for the different areas of responsibility.

The third level documents include instructions for speciﬁ c activities and tasks included in the different areas of responsibility as deﬁ ned by the second level documents.

In addition to the three levels of documents, there can also be various types of administrative handbooks. The purpose of the quality and management system is to achieve a uniﬁ ed and consistent control system forallplantactivitiesbasedonclearpoliciesandmeasurableobjectives.Thereshouldbecompletetraceability

from policy to work instruction.

The standard ISO 9001:2000 for quality management systems, lead to more emphasis on processes and attempts to implement process-orientation in the organisation and daily work.

F.23.2.2 Quality system implementation and quality audit programmes

Every Swedish NPP has developed a quality audit programme, which is used to monitor how well the quality system is implemented and applied in the organization on different levels, as well as the efﬁ ciency of the system to ensure quality and safety. SKB is the licensee for Clab and SFR as described in section F.21.2. SKB has agreements with OKG for the operation of the Clab facility and with FKA for the operation of SFR. SKB therefore reviews and audits both organisations regarding management of Clab and SFR. Being responsible for the long-term safety of SFR, SKB also reviews all NPP companies with regard to fulﬁ lment of regulatory requirements concerning waste generation and conditioning.

F.23.2.3

Quality audits of suppliers

According to the SKI requirements on quality assurance, all purchases of goods and services which might have an affect, directly or indirectly, on the protection and safety of the environment or personnel, shall be made from suppliers that through quality audits, or in other ways, have shown that they can comply with quality requirements.

The ambition of the NPPs is not limited to these demands, but also includes suppliers of goods and services, where malfunctioning might cause considerable consequences for the NPPs. A review of a supplier includes not only a quality audit, but also a technical and commercial evaluation of the equipment or services offered. Since 1998 a review of the supplier’s environmental management system is included in the review. These aspects will, however, not be covered in this report.

The purpose of a quality audit of a potential supplier is not only to evaluate whether the supplier has implementedandusesadocumentedqualitysystem,butalsotoevaluatethesupplier’scapabilityof providing the correct and expected quality. Quality audits are typically performed by teams of 1–4 auditors. The audit team shall be led by a person with documented knowledge and experience in the QA area and with the quality norms. The team leader shall have experience from participation in several quality audits. The team shall comprise one or more persons with competence or experience from the product or service to be reviewed. Thus, there is no formal licensing of audit team leaders and team members for Swedish nuclear facilities.

Aqualityauditresultsinareport,whichmustbeacceptedbythecompanyreviewed,beforebeingpresented to the purchasing organization. If deﬁ ciencies are revealed during the audit, the organization under review is requested to describe what measures will be taken to correct the deﬁ ciencies, in order to be accepted as a supplier of products or services to the organisation. In certain cases a follow-up visit of the audited company is required to verify that the company has taken the actions.

Approvedqualityauditsaccomplishedbyanyof theotherSwedishNPPsarenormallyconsideredcomparablewithaplant’sownqualityauditsand,consequently,auditduplicationsof agivensuppliercanbeavoided. Simpliﬁ ed quality audits or evaluation of previous experience of a supplier are sometimes acceptable, when purchasing goods and services dedicated for use in the lower quality classes.

F.23.3

Regulatory control

SKI’s own quality system includes guidance for SKI-staff when reviewing the licensees’ quality systems. Usually the quality system itself is not the only target for SKI’s review and inspections. Appropriate aspects

of the application of quality assurance are included in all SKI regulatory inspections. Thus during inspections, routines and instructions are studied, as well as how they are enforced in practice in order to control safety-related activities.

SKI also makes assessments of quality assurance processes when reviewing large modiﬁ cation plans, for example the recent extension of Clab. The licensees’ plans for quality audits and the reports of the audits that have been performed are also subject to review by SKI.

In general SKI has been satisﬁ ed with the implementation of quality assurance. The development of the integrated approach to quality and management systems has taken several years and considerable effort. In some cases implementation has not been well prepared, and has been slowed down due to insufﬁ cient staff resources, or lack of support from all organizational levels. Organizational changes have also affected the implementationwork,andmaderevisionsnecessary.Theregulatoryexperienceshowsthenecessityof having a living quality audit programme at the plants, and using the audits to develop quality and safety. This means that the audits should not only investigate compliance with the documented routines, but also the suitability and the efﬁ ciency of the routines in line with the concept of a learning organization.

F.23.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 23.

ARTICLE 24. OPERATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION

1.Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that during the operating lifetime of a spent fuel or radioactive waste management facility:

(i)the radiation exposure of the workers and the public caused by the facility shall be kept as low as reasonably achievable, economic and social factors being taken into account;

(ii)no individual shall be exposed, in normal situations, to radiation doses which exceed national prescriptions for dose limitation which have due regard to internationally endorsed standards on radiation protection; and

(iii)measures are taken to prevent unplanned and uncontrolled releases of radioactive materials into the environment.

2.Each Contracting Party shall take appropriate steps to ensure that discharges shall be limited:

(i)to keep exposure to radiation as low as reasonably achievable, economic and socialfactors being taken into account; and

(ii)so that no individual shall be exposed, in normal situations, to radiation doses which exceed national prescriptions for dose limitation which have due regard to internationally endorsed standards on radiation protection.

3.Each Contracting Party shall take appropriate steps to ensure that during the operating lifetime of a regulated nuclear facility, in the event that an unplanned or uncontrolled release of radioactive materials into the environment occurs, appropriate corrective measures are implemented to control the release and mitigate its effects.

F.24	OPERATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION
F.24.1	Regulatory requirements
F.24.1.1	Regulatory requirements on occupational radiation protection

To ensure low radiation exposure from nuclear facilities, including facilities for the management of spent fuel or radioactive waste, Sweden has a number of regulatory requirements. Fundamental radiation protection requirements for workers and the public are given in the following SSI regulations.

SSI FS 1998:4 Regulations on Dose Limits at Work with Ionising Radiation.

The regulations apply to limitation of radiation doses to workers and the general public at practices with ionising radiation. The regulations also apply to the protection of pregnant women that may be exposed to ionising radiation in their work. In the general obligations it is stipulated that anyone who conducts a practice with ionising radiation shall ensure that:

-the practice is justiﬁ ed, by which is meant that the use of radiation gives a beneﬁ t that exceeds the estimated health detriment caused by the radiation;

-the radiation protection measures are optimised, by which is meant that human exposures are as low as reasonably achievable, social and economic factors taken into account; and

-no dose limit in these regulations is exceeded.

For workers in general the annual effective dose limit is 50 mSv. In addition, for ﬁ ve consecutive years the effective dose limit is 100 mSv. A pregnant woman has the right to be transferred to work that does not imply exposure to ionising radiation during the remaining time of pregnancy. Should she choose to remain to her ordinary work, the work shall be planned in such a way that the equivalent dose to the foetus becomes as small as reasonably achievable and that it is unlikely that it exceeds 1 mSv during the remaining period of pregnancy.

Concerning the general public the sum of the dose contributions from practices with ionising radiation shall not exceed:

-1 mSv annual effective dose;

-15 mSv annual equivalent dose to the lens of the eye; or

-50 mSv annual equivalent dose to the skin evaluated as the mean equivalent dose over an area of 1 cm2 regardless of the size of the exposed area.

Effective dose is deﬁ ned as the sum of all equivalent doses to organs or tissues, weighted for their different sensitivity for radiation. Equivalent dose is deﬁ ned as an absorbed dose to an organ or tissue, weighted by factors taking into account the biological efﬁ ciency of the kind of radiation. SSI takes the dose limits into account when judging conditions for licences. As several practices may contribute to the exposure of an individual, speciﬁ ed regulations or conditions are given for the various practices.

SSI FS 1998:5 Regulations on Monitoring and Reporting of Individual Radiation Doses.

Theregulationsapplytomeasurementsof individualradiationdosestoworkersof categoryAengagedinwork withionisingradiationandreportingof suchdosestotheNationalDoseDatabase.TheNationalDoseDatabase is a database at SSI that records measured individual doses. Category A is deﬁ ned below in SSI FS 1998:3.

SSI FS 1996:3 Regulations on Outside Workers at Work with Ionising Radiation.

The regulations apply to outside workers of category A working within controlled areas in Sweden and on cases when Swedish workers of category A perform similar tasks in other countries. Category A and controlled area are deﬁ ned below in SSI FS 1998:3.

SSI FS 1998:6 Regulations on Medical Examinations for Work Involving Ionizing Radiation.

The regulations apply to medical examinations of individuals in Category A. The regulations also apply to medical examinations of outside workers that will work within a controlled area. Category A and controlled area are deﬁ ned below in SSI FS 1998:3.

SSI FS 1998:3 Regulations on Categorization of Workplaces and Workers at Work with Ionising Radiation

The regulations apply to practices with ionising radiation where humans may get radiation doses such that:

-the annual effective dose exceeds 1 (mSv);

-the annual equivalent dose to the lens of the eye exceeds 15 mSv; or

-the annual equivalent dose to the hands, forearms or the skin exceeds 50 mSv.

Anyone who runs a practice shall classify the workers into category A or B. A worker shall belong to category A if the likelihood is not negligible that:

-the annual effective dose exceeds 6 mSv;

-the annual equivalent dose to the lens of the eye exceeds 45 mSv; or

-the annual equivalent dose to the hands, forearms or the skin exceeds 150 mSv.

WorkersnotbelongingtocategoryAshallbelongtocategoryB.Forthoseworkerssurveillanceof dosesshall be performed to such an extent that it is possible to demonstrate that this classiﬁ cation is correct.

A workplace where the workers may get any of the annual doses pointed out above or from which radioactivecontaminationmaybespreadshallbeacontrolledarea.Acontrolledareashallbedelineatedandaccess restricted to authorised persons, i.e. persons who have been sufﬁ ciently trained.

With all the above regulations as a basis, two regulations specially directed towards nuclear facilities have been formulated:

-SSIFS2000:10RegulationsonRadiationProtectionof WorkersExposedtoIonisingRadiationatNuclear Plants; and

-SSI FS 2000:11 Regulations on Radiation Protection Manager at Nuclear Plants.

The most important requirements in SSI FS 2000:10 and SSI FS 2000:11 are listed below.

Optimisation

The work shall be performed in such a way that human exposures are limited as far as reasonably achievable, social and economical factors being taken into account. For this purpose the licence-holder shall ensure that goals and actions necessary for control are established and documented and that necessary resources are available.

The goals and actions of control shall be adjusted with respect to the prerequisite of the facility and be drawn up to take care of daily as well as long-term radiation protection. All individuals exposed to ionising radiation, or who are decision-makers in matters that affect the individual doses, shall be acquainted with the current goals and the actions of control. The implementation, including the goals and actions of control, shall regularly be followed up and evaluated. These evaluations shall be performed at least once a year and the documentation of the evaluation shall be sent to SSI.

Information and education

All personnel, permanent staff and contractors, shall be informed about radiation protection prior to work within a controlled area (categorisation of work places and workers at work with ionising radiation is deﬁ ned in SSI FS 1998:3). Repetitive information shall thereafter be given at least every third year.

All persons who are working with matters related to radiation protection or operation and maintenance, as well as external workers holding posts as foremen, shall have gone through an education programme, including the fundamental principles of radiation protection. The work shall be adjusted with regard to the kind and extent of the work, as well as the environment in which it is performed. Repetitive education shall be given as necessary.

Medical examination

Medical examination for radiological activities is regulated in special regulations (SSI FS 1998:6). Site-speciﬁ c instruction concerning radiation protection

The licence-holder shall ensure that site-speciﬁ c instructions for radiation protection are established. The instructions shall for example include the facilities internal requirements and routines for controlled areas, personal dose monitoring and the handling and transport of radioactive substances within the plant.

Controlled areas

Within a controlled area, premises and places shall be especially marked and admittance restricted, if the risk of receiving a yearly effective dose exceeding 50 mSv in these places is not negligible.

Smoking and consumption of food are forbidden in controlled areas. Beverages may be obtained from a drinking fountain, or may be served within special areas.

For the purpose of showing that the requirement on categorisation of working places is met, monitoring of areas outside the controlled area shall be performed.

Visitors

Visitors of the general public in a controlled area must only be permitted if guided by a responsible person and if a prearranged plan is followed. Visitors to controlled areas must be at least 14 years old.

Personal dose monitoring

All personnel, permanent staff as well as external workers, at work within a controlled area, shall carry an individual dose meter that meets the requirements stated in the SSI regulations on monitoring and reporting of individual radiation doses (SSI FS 1998:5).

Allpersonswithinacontrolledarea,classiﬁ edwithrespecttosurfaceoraircontamination,shallundergocontamination checks before leaving the area. If there is reason to suspect that individuals have been internally contaminated, or if internal contamination is conﬁ rmed, all such individuals shall undergo whole body counting.

Dose limits at nuclear facilities are the same as those recommended by the ICRP, i.e. 100 mSv effective dose over a 5 year period and 50 mSv for one year. Dose limits are stated in SSI’s regulations on dose limits at work with ionising radiation (SSI FS 1998:4).

Instruments and equipment

All instruments used for radiation protection and the control of radiation doses shall be calibrated and undergo regular functional checks.

Transport within the facility

All transportation within the industrial area shall, as far as is practical, be in accordance with the regulations on the transport of hazardous goods on roads with regard to the requirements on dose-rate, surface contamination or the transportation package.

Work with irradiated fuel elements

Work with dismantling irradiated fuel elements at a reactor, where single fuel rods are handled, must not take placeearlierthanﬁ vedaysafterthereactorisputintothecoldshutdownmode.Duringworkwithfuelrodsonly persons directly involved in the work may be present. Air monitoring shall be performed continuously during the work at the working position for fuel dismantling. Documented instructions for alarms and evacuation of the premises shall be available. The instructions shall be well known by all persons working on the premises.

Policy in the event of fuel damage

A documented policy for the event of fuel damage shall be established at all facilities where nuclear reactors are involved. The policy shall include a description of the facility’s strategy for avoiding fuel damage as far as reasonably possible. In addition there shall be a strategy for how to handle a situation with fuel damage.

Reporting to SSI

An annual written report shall be sent to SSI that contains a compilation of the radiation doses to personnel as well as the results of the radiation surveillance outside the controlled area.

Anyworkforwhichthetotalcollectivedoseisexpectedtoexceed100mmanSvshallbereportedinwriting to SSI in advance. No later than 3 months after work for which the total collective dose has exceeded 100 mmanSv is ﬁ nished, a written report shall be sent to SSI that includes the experience obtained concerning radiation protection matters.

Any internal contamination occurring, in one single event, which is calculated to give a committed effective dose exceeding 5 mSv shall be reported to SSI. The report shall comprise the type of intake, the estimated committed effective dose and the basis for those calculations, as well as the cause and circumstances of the internal contamination. The report shall be sent as soon as possible after the contamination has been discovered.

If therehasbeenaneventthathasimplied,orcouldhaveimplied,thatanygivendoselimit(SSIFS1998:4) is exceeded, a report shall be sent to SSI as soon as possible.

Documentation and ﬁ ling of measurement data

Primary data on the evaluation of individual radiation doses due to external as well as internal exposure shall be kept at least one year after the calendar year in which the measurements were made. From the ﬁ nal results of these evaluations it shall be possible to correlate a measured dose to the person that received the dose. The ﬁ nal results shall be available in a central register, approved by SSI.

Radiation protection manager

The licence-holder shall appoint a radiation protection manager. This person shall be approved by SSI and must have sufficient competence in matters related to radiation protection (SSI has issued general advice on the competence of radiation protection experts, SSI FS 2000:6). The manager shall e.g. ensure that the individual and collective doses are followed up, actively work for acceptable radiation levels in the nuclear facility, and ensure that local rules are established in order to avoid unacceptable or unnecessary doses.

F.24.1.2

Regulatory requirements on environmental radiation protection

In1977SSIissuedtheﬁ rstgeneralregulationsconcerningthelimitationof releasesof radioactivesubstances from nuclear power plants. Minor revisions of the regulations have been made during the period that the regulations have been in use (SSI FS 1991:5).

Amajorrevisionwasmadein1999–2000.Thepresentregulations(SSIFS2000:12)concerningprotection of human health and the environment from releases of radioactive substances from certain nuclear facilities entered into force on 1 January 2002.

The regulations apply for nuclear power reactors, research reactors, fuel fabrication facilities, storages for spent fuel and waste disposal facilities during their operational phase (shallow land burial sites are excluded). The previous regulations were only applicable for nuclear power plants. Other facilities were regulated separately but basically in the same manner.

Purpose of the release regulations

The main purpose with the new regulations is to limit and reduce the releases of radionuclides from nuclear facilities. The limitation of releases of radioactive substances from nuclear facilities shall be based on optimisation of radiation protection and use of the best available technique.

Dose constraints and critical group

According to SSI’s regulations (SSI FS 1998:4) the dose limit for members of the public is 1 mSv per year from all contributing artiﬁ cial radiation sources. This limit is also in accordance with EU BSS. Taking into consideration that an individual may be affected by dose contributions from more than one facility/source, a dose constraint for a particular site is set to 0.1 mSv per year in the release regulations (SSI FS 2000:12). This means that the facility has to show that the doses from releases are below 0.1 mSv per year to the most affected individuals, the critical group.

When taking into account that some of the radionuclides will be present in the environment for a long time, it is important to compare the dose constraint of 0.1 mSv with the dose commitment from a yearly release, rather than with the dose from the release. SSI has chosen to set the integration time to 50 years when calculating the dose commitment. When the calculated dose is 0.01 mSv or more per calendar year, realistic calculations of radiation doses shall be conducted for the most affected area. These calculations shall be based on measured dispersion data and knowledge about the most affected area.

Release limits

SSIhasnotformallydeﬁ nedanynuclidespeciﬁ creleaselimitations.Limitationisbeingimplementedthrough the restriction of dose to the critical group. Thus, for each nuclear facility and for each radionuclide that could be potentially released, site-speciﬁ c release-to-dose values have been established. These values have been calculated for hypothetical critical groups, and take into consideration reasonably realistic local dispersion conditions, as well as assumptions on diet and the contribution of locally produced foodstuff to the diet of the group.

Use of best available technique

The best available technique (BAT) shall be used for reducing releases at nuclear facilities. BAT is deﬁ ned as the most effective measure available to limit the release of radioactive substances and the harmful effects of the releases on human health and the environment, which does not entail unreasonable costs. For nuclear power reactors in particular, two new concepts, reference and target values, have been introduced.

A reference value is a value for the release of individual radionuclides, or groups of radionuclides that indicate the optimal operation of the reactor in terms of performance and management of systems of importance for the generation, elimination or delay of releases into the environment. Nuclide(s) should be chosen on the basis of, e.g., impact or indicative function for abatement system performance. The operator is responsible for formulation of reference values for a speciﬁ ed time, and these are to be scrutinized by SSI.

A target value will deﬁ ne the ambition of the operator in terms of release limitation, taking into account, inter alia, the best available technique. The target value is to be deﬁ ned by the operator, as well as the time frame within which the operator plans to reach the target.

All releases of radioactive substances to the environment shall be measured. In particular, releases to the atmosphereviathemainstacksof nuclearpowerreactorsshallbecontrolledthroughcontinuousnuclide-spe- ciﬁ c measurements of volatile radioactive substances such as noble gases, continuously collected samples of iodine and particle-bound radioactive substances, as well as the measurements of carbon-14 and tritium.

Releases to water shall be controlled through the measurements of representative samples for each release pathway. The analyses shall cover nuclide-speciﬁ c measurements of gammaand alpha-emitting radioactive substances as well as, where relevant, strontium-90 and tritium.

Environmental monitoring shall be conducted in the area surrounding a nuclear facility in accordance with a programme formulated by SSI.

According to the regulations, quality assurance and documentation of environmental monitoring shall be provided in accordance with the principles of the ISO 9000.

Reporting

The nuclear power reactor licence-holders shall report to SSI annually the measures that have been adopted, or that are planned to be adopted, to limit radioactive releases with the aim of achieving the speciﬁ ed target value. If reference values are exceeded, the measures that are planned to achieve the reference values shall be reported.

Releases of radioactive substances to the air and water as well as results from environmental monitoring shall be reported semi-annually to SSI. The report concerning the second half of the year shall, at the same time, constitute the annual report.

Events leading to increased releases of radioactive substances from nuclear facilities shall be reported as soon as possible to SSI, describing the measures adopted to mitigate the releases. In particular, in the event of the release of radioactive substances to air or water, which results in a dose to any individual in the critical group exceeding 10 microsievert per month or if results from environmental monitoring show abnormally large quantities of radioactive substances, the SSI shall be notiﬁ ed immediately. In addition, for nuclear power reactors, plans of action shall exist to limit the release of radioactive substances that can arise in the event of fuel failures. The strategy for avoiding the occurrence of fuel failures and the measures planned to limit radioactive releases to the environment in the event of a fuel failure shall be described in the plans. Depending on the situation, the SSI can issue additional regulations.

F.24.2	Radiation impact of spent fuel and radioactive waste management facilities
F.24.2.1	Occupational radiation doses

In general both individual and collective doses from radioactive waste handling at nuclear power plants are low compared to doses from normal operation, and maintenance and service work performed at outages. Nevertheless it is important that the working methods are carefully planned and in compliance with the existing regulatory requirements (see Section F.24.1.1), to make sure that occupational radiation protection is optimised.

In this section examples of occupational doses received at spent fuel and radioactive waste management facilities are presented. Personnel that work with radioactive waste at the nuclear power plants are exposed to annual doses in the order of a few mSv. The annual collective doses at the nuclear power plants to this category of workers are normally in the order of 10–20 mmanSv.

At the central interim storage facility for spent nuclear fuel (Clab), doses are obtained from the normal operation with receiving, unloading and cleaning the transport containers. In addition, maintenance and service of Clab’s internal lift and handling equipment, and the water cleaning system give radiation doses. The doses to the personnel at Clab reported between 1995 and 2004 are shown in ﬁ gure F1.

Figure F1: Doses to the personnel at Clab1995- 2004.

No open radiation sources are handled at the ﬁ nal repository for low and intermediate level waste (SFR) and all radioactive waste is conditioned. Thus, the doses to the personnel originate from external radiation. Contamination of transport casks and waste packages has never occurred to the extent that any airborne radioactivity has been measured. The yearly doses to the personnel at SFR are very low. There are some variations depending upon whether waste packages have been covered with cement during the year or not. The doses to the personnel since 1988 (when SFR was taken into operation) until 2004 have been about 25 mmanSv. This gives a yearly average dose of less than 2 mmanSv.

Studsvik operates several facilities for treatment of radioactive waste. For 2004 they reported a yearly dose of 45 mmanSv and an average dose of 1.3 mSv. Ranstad Mineral recycles uranium mainly from the fuel fabrication activities at Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB. The doses reported by Ranstad Mineral for 2004 are a yearly dose of 9.6 mmanSv and an average dose of 1.9 mSv.

For the personnel that work with waste handling at Westinghouse Electric Sweden AB fuel factory the individual doses are below 1.0 mSv.

F.24.2.2 Radiation doses from releases to the environment

FigureF2showstheradiationdosesrelatedtoallreleasesfromnuclearpowerplantsandothernuclearfacilities for the years 2002–2004. Generally, the resulting doses to individuals in the public are less than 1% of the limit, except for one site (Ringhals) where the resulting dose during the 1990s has been considerably higher. The main reason for this is a combination of uranium contamination on system surfaces and the short delay time for the efﬂ uents (in the BWR). However, through installation of new abatement systems and a successive clean-up of the primary system the releases from the Ringhals site are now reduced to a level where the dominating dose contribution instead comes from carbon-14 (in PWR), see ﬁgure F2.

From the available release data it is not possible to single out releases from the radioactive waste handling atthenuclearpowerplants.ThereleasesfromClabareincludedinthereleasesfromOskarshamnNPP.From SFR releases to the air and water are measured. The releases are reported as part of the total release from Forsmark NPP and constitute a small part of this release. For example a release of 1.14*105 Bq Cs-137 to the water was the only measured release from SFR during 2001. No releases have been reported from Ranstad Mineral. However, the recent regulations (SSI FS 2000:12) also apply for Ranstad Mineral, and they will have to report releases on a regular basis. From Ågesta very small releases are reported. For example during 2001 the highest measured activity in the water was <0.26 Bq/l Co-60 and 6 840 Bq/l H-3.

Figure F2: Radiation doses (in mSv) to individuals in the critical group from releases 2002–2004.

F.24.3

Regulatory control

See Section E.19.2.3

F.24.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 24.

ARTICLE 25. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

1.Each Contracting Party shall ensure that before and during operation of a spent fuel or radioactive waste management facility there are appropriate on-site and, if necessary, off-site emergency plans. Such emergency plans should be tested at an appropriate frequency.

2.EachContractingPartyshalltaketheappropriatestepsforthepreparationandtestingof emergency plans for its territory insofar as it is likely to be affected in the event of a radiological emergency at a spent fuel or radioactive waste management facility in the vicinity of its territory.

F.25	EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS

The emergency plans for all nuclear power plants and Studsvik include the installations for spent fuel and radioactive waste management at these facilities. The Clab and SFR facilities are included in the emergency plansforthenuclearpowerplantsOKGandForsmarkrespectively.ThefuelfabricationfacilityWestinghouse Electric Sweden AB also has an emergency plan.

F.25.1

Regulatory requirements

In the Government bill 1980/81:90, issued after the Three Mile Island accident, the emergency preparedness issues received considerable attention. It was proposed by the Government, and decided by Parliament, that the emergency planning must consider all types of accidents, from those with very small environmental consequences to the most serious accidents. Further, systematic training of decision-makers must be undertaken as well as the organization of personnel on duty and a system for veriﬁ ed telecommunication between the responsible organizations. Finally it was required that technical support centres to the control rooms of the nuclear power plants should be established.

SSI’s role is to maintain and further develop the national radiation protection preparedness. The preparedness shall be assessed in national and international exercises, and shall be co-ordinated in accordance with international treaties. Moreover, SSI shall co-ordinate the national resources for radiation measurements, and shall maintain responsibility for the operation of air ﬁ lter stations. All these obligations are stated in the Civil Protection Act (2003:778), the Civil Protection Ordinance (2003:779) and in the Ordinance with instructions for SSI (1988:295). Furthermore SSI and SKI have a role when it comes to society’s emergency management through the Emergency Preparedness Ordinance (2002:472). Several authorities are jointly responsible for planning and co-ordinating security and emergency measures.

The development and practice of an on-site emergency preparedness plan is a licensing condition. This requirement is speciﬁ ed in SKI’s general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) and in SSI Regulations on Emergency Planning at certain Nuclear Facilities (SSI FS 2005:2 that will enter into force January 1, 2006). The regulationsareapplicabletospentfuelandradioactivewastemanagementfacilitiesaswellastonuclearpower plants and nuclear fuel production facilities.

It is required of the licence-holders that in case of incidents that could lead to a radiological accident, there are plans for:

-alerting the emergency preparedness personnel without delay;

-bringing the plant to a safe and stable state;

-ascertaining personnel safety; and

-providing information about the technical and radiological situation at the plant.

The plan shall be kept up to date and tested in regular exercises. It is further required that there are specially assigned and trained personnel, suitable emergency operating centres, technical systems, tools and protective equipment to the extent needed to carry out the tasks mentioned. Further details about planning conditions are given in the general recommendations to the regulations.

In the Civil Protection Act and Ordinance it is stated that a county is responsible for the protection of and information to the citizens living there in the event of a nuclear accident of any kind. The Swedish Rescue Services Agency has also issued requirements on alarming and informing the public.

Sweden has signed the Convention of Assistance in the Case of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency and the Convention of Early Notiﬁ cation of a Nuclear Accident. Sweden has in addition made several bilateral agreements concerning information in the event of an accident. These conventions and bilateral agreements apply to all nuclear facilities, including facilities for the management of spent nuclear fuel or radioactive waste.

Thelicence-holdersarerequiredtocarryoutexerciseseveryyear.Inadditiontointernalexercisesanddrills a nuclear power plant has a comprehensive national exercise together with the county and central authorities

every eighth year, to check the emergency plans and the capability of the on-site and off-site organisations. These exercises are planned by the respective county administration and are evaluated by the Rescue Services Agency. Some 15 to 30 organisations usually participate in these exercises. SSI and SKI participate in the planning, the exercises, and in the evaluation process.

F.25.2

National monitoring and measuring

A network of permanent radiation monitoring stations (SSI gamma stations) has been in operation since the end of the 1950s. After the Chernobyl accident, the number of monitoring stations was increased from 25 to 37,anddatatransmissiontoSSIviamodemsandtelephonelineswasintroduced.Thestationsaredesignedto initiate an alarm in the event of elevated radiation levels. All components of the system are now out of date and the entire monitoring system must be evaluated. The measurement chambers have become increasingly unreliableandmustbeeitherupdatedorreplaced.Theelectronicsfordatastorageandtransmissionaremore than 10 years old and use a communication protocol that is no longer supported by the telephone system. During 2004, operating disturbances occurred regularly at 9–10 stations. An investigation to determine how the next generation of radiation monitoring stations should be conﬁ gured is nearly completed.

Coordinatednationalpreparednessformeasurementsof ionizingradiationhasbeensetupbyagreements with the radiation physics departments at six universities, and also with FOI (Swedish Defence Research Agency) in Umeå and Stockholm, and Studsvik Nuclear AB. The nuclear power plants participate in the national preparedness on a voluntary basis. Malå Geoscience AB keeps an emergency supply of monitoring instruments. SGU (Geological Survey of Sweden) has maintained its capacity for airborne spectrometry, with measuring equipment partially funded by SSI. SLU (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences) in Alnarp has been contracted to carry out an exercise programme for radiation measurements in agriculture, using voluntary defence organizations and the contract laboratories. FOI has been contracted to keep ﬁ ve air ﬁ lter stations in operation, including analysis of the air ﬁ lter samples. No activity levels above the reporting limit have been detected during 2004. SSI has made an agreement with SMHI (Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute) for continual dispersion forecasts and the handling of international alarms (National

Figure F4: Gamma radiation, and air sampling stations in Sweden.

Warning Point). The dispersion forecasts for hypothetical emissions are calculated every six hours for all Swedish nuclear power plants and for a number of nuclear power plants in neighbouring countries. The forecasts are continuously available for SSI at SMHI. SSI sends them out if an accident should occur. The location of the air sampling and monitoring stations is shown in Figure F4.

F.25.3

Regulatory control

SSI and SKI inspect the on-site emergency preparedness both separately and together. Areas that have been assessed are documentation and implementation of plans and regulations. SSI has also inspected the capabilities of the licence-holders to ensure the radiation protection of their staff in accidents with high radiation levels, and procedures for alarming and to provide continued information about technical and radiation protection status.

In addition to inspections of the emergency planning, SKI and SSI occasionally inspect the plant actions during emergency exercises. For this purpose a special inspection model has been developed in order to assess the most important tasks for safety.

The off-site emergency planning is assessed by the Swedish Rescue Services Agency in cooperation with other relevant authorities.

F.25.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 25.

ARTICLE 26. DECOMMISSIONING

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure the safety of decommissioning of a nuclear facility. Such steps shall ensure that:

(i)qualiﬁ ed staff and adequate ﬁ nancial resources are available;

(ii)theprovisionsof Article24withrespecttooperationalradiationprotection,dischargesandunplanned and uncontrolled releases are applied;

(iii)the provisions of Article 25 with respect to emergency preparedness are applied; and

(iv)records of information important to decommissioning are kept.

F. 26	DECOMMISSIONING
F.26.1	Legal and regulatory requirements

According to the Environmental Code (1998:808) prior permission is needed for decommissioning and dismantling. As described in Section E.19.1.3 the applicant has to show compliance with a number of principles, e.g. the knowledge principle, the precautionary and BAT principles, and the after-treatment liability principle.

F.26.1.1

Nuclear safety

According to the Act on Nuclear Activities (SFS 1984:3), the licence-holder for nuclear activities shall be responsible for ensuring that all measures are taken needed for:

-maintaining safety, with reference to the nature of the activities and the conditions in which they are conducted;

-ensuring the safe handling and ﬁ nal disposal of nuclear waste arising in the activities or nuclear material arising therein that is not reused; and

-the safe decommissioning and the dismantling of plants in which nuclear activities are no longer to be conducted.

It follows from the third paragraph that a licence holder is not exempted from responsibilities according to the act until decommissioning and dismantling has taken place. In the revised general regulations SKIFS 2004:1 a chapter on decommissioning has been added with requirements on:

-A preliminary plan for the future decommissioning of the facility to be compiled as before construction of a facility.

-An integrated analysis and assessment of how safety is going to be maintained during the time remaining until closure, to be done as soon as a decision has been taken on ﬁ nal shutdown of a facility.

-The decommissioning plan to be supplemented and incorporated into the facility’s safety report before the dismantling of the facility may be initiated.

Theplanshallincludemeasures,whichmustbeimplementedtoensurethesafecontainmentof thegenerated nuclearwaste.Thus,thegeneralobligations,therevisedgeneralregulationsSKIFS2004:1andseveralSSIregulations (see section F.26.1.2) are applicable for the decommissioning and dismantling activities, regarding:

-the availability of qualiﬁ ed staff and ﬁ nancial resources (as accounted for in section F.22);

-the application of provisions with respect to operational radiation protection, discharges and unplanned and uncontrolled releases (as accounted for in section F.24);

-the application of provisions with respect to emergency preparedness (as accounted for in section F.25); and

-the keeping of records of information important to decommissioning.

F.26.1.2

Radiation protection

Mostof theSSIregulationsonradiationprotectionthatareapplicableatnuclearfacilitiesarealsovalidduring decommissioning(seesectionF.24).OneexceptionistheregulationsSSIFS2000:12concerningprotectionof human health and the environment from discharges of radioactive substances from certain nuclear facilities. SSI intends to promulgate regulations regarding discharges during decommissioning. It may be expected that any potential dose constraints (in these regulations) will not exceed those given in SSI FS 2000:12.

Filing of documentation at nuclear facilities is regulated in SSI FS 1997:1. The licence-holder shall keep archives where documentation related to radiation protection aspects of a practice shall be ﬁ led. If the

practice ceases the archives shall be handed over to the National Archives of Sweden or Regional Archives. Detailed requirements on keeping a register for the radioactive waste and nuclear waste at nuclear facilities are given in SSI FS 2001:1. The register shall for example contain information on the origin of the waste and the amount and nuclide speciﬁ c content of the waste.

Planning of radiation protection issues before and during the decommissioning of nuclear plants is regulated in SSI FS 2002:4. The regulations put requirements on planning, both during operation and after ﬁ nal shutdown. The main purpose of the regulations is to ensure that worker doses and releases of radioactivity to the environment during decommissioning are in accordance with ALARA principles and within speciﬁ ed limits, by requiring adequate planning of the decommissioning activities in advance. The regulations entered into force January 1, 2004, and the content of the regulations is described below.

Area of application

The regulations are intended to be applicable to all nuclear facilities, except permanent installations in repositories for radioactive wastes (such parts that will remain after closure).

Deﬁ nitions

The term “decommissioning” is used to describe all actions taken by the licence-holder after ﬁ nal shutdown in order to reduce the amount of radioactive substances in the land and building structures to levels that permit release of the site and any buildings left behind.

The term “release of site” is used to describe a decision by the SSI that, from a radiation protection point of view, there are no further restrictions on the use of land and any remaining buildings.

The term “ﬁ nally shutdown facility” is used to describe a facility in which the main operations have ceased with no intention to resuming them.

New or reconstructed facilities

It is required that radiation protection issues of the future decommissioning shall be considered during construction of a new nuclear facility or when an existing facility is reconstructed.

Decommissioning plans

Fornuclearfacilitiesinoperation,themainrequirementof theregulationsisthatthelicence-holdershallhave a preliminary plan for future decommissioning of the facility. The plan shall be kept up-to-date and reviewed in connection with changes in the facility. The regulations do not prescribe how or when decommissioning shall be performed. Instead, the regulations demand that the licence-holder investigates different possible options in order to make an optimised choice.

Finally shut down facility

When a facility has been ﬁ nally shut down, the regulations require that the licence-holder present an overall description of the foreseen decommissioning, covering methods, time-scales and project goals. The description shall be submitted to SSI within one year of the ﬁ nal shutdown, together with an overall description of the radiological consequences of the chosen decommissioning option. The description shall cover probable radiation doses to personnel and releases of radioactive substances to the environment, activities that can lead to unplanned events, and the expected amounts and ﬂ ow of radioactive material.

Dismantling and demolition after ﬁ nal shutdown

The regulations require that the licence-holder shall submit an overall description of the work to SSI at least four months before dismantling is initiated. The description shall essentially be a detailed plan of the foreseen activities, covering the same issues as the pre-planning. SSI will review the plan and, if required, impose additional radiation protection conditions on the work.

Basis for site release

After decommissioning, the licence-holder should prove that the site could be released from regulatory control. Therefore the regulations require that the licence-holder shall document relevant information during decommissioning. The documentation shall contain results from measurements and calculations, as well as information concerning decisions and actions taken that have inﬂ uence on the distribution and the amount of remaining radioactive substances.

F.26.2

Measures taken by the licence-holders

The nuclear power companies are themselves responsible for planning, licensing and decommissioning of nuclear power plants. SKB has been assigned the task of conducting general decommissioning studies

in order to ensure that that overall necessary competence exists and that cost calculations are carried out according to requirements. SKB participates in various international decommissioning studies undertaken by international organizations, and also by direct contact with various decommissioning projects that may be of value for planning activities in Sweden.

Management of decommissioning waste is coordinated through SKB and SKB has also been tasked with the future disposal of decommissioning waste. A method for dry interim storage of core components has been developed, along with a database system for registration of waste.

The main thrust of the work during the upcoming six-year period will be:

-Studies regarding disposal of whole reactor pressure vessels and other large components.

-An update of historical decommissioning studies.

-A more comprehensive decommissioning study is being conducted.

-Estimation of dose budget for decommissioning of NPPs.

-Management of inactive waste (quantities, disposal, reuse).

-Overviewof decommissioninglogistics.Examinetheconsequencesof extendingoperationfrom40to60 years. Plan for the phase-out considering the fact that the resources for the phase-out will be limited.

-Preliminary safety assessments of ﬁ nal repository for short-lived waste (coordination of ﬁ nal repository for operational waste with ﬁ nal repository for short-lived waste).

-Work on a preliminary safety evaluation of long-term safety in the ﬁ nal disposal of long-lived lowand intermediate-level waste will begin at the end of the period.

Commercial power plants

So far only generic decommissioning plans have been developed for the Swedish nuclear power plants as part of the basis for the annual cost estimates (see section E.19.1.4) but the closure of the nuclear power reactor Barsebäck 1 has resulted in extensive planning work at the plant to prepare for the complete dismantling and decommissioning. Comprehensive dismantling and demolition work will for reasons of safety not be initiated until the other unit at the site, has also been permanently shut down and all spent nuclear fuel has been removed from the unit. Barsebäck 2 was permanently shut down in on May 31, 2005. Spent fuel will be stored in the fuel pool at the unit until the end of 2006 before being transported to Clab. According to current plans, large scale dismantling and demolishing work on the twin unit plant will begin not sooner than 10 – 15 years from now.

Research facilities

There are a number of facilities at the Studsvik site that are in the process of being decommissioned and/or dismantled. Plans for the decommissioning and dismantling of those facilities have, before actual decommissioning activities started, been prepared by the licence-holders and submitted to SKI for evaluation and approval, according to requirements in the general regulations. The status of the facilities under decommissioning is accounted for in section D.32.5.2.

F.26.3

Regulatory control

Regulatory control is conducted by means of the regulatory review and approval of plans for decommissioning and dismantling, complemented by inspection activities at the sites, as necessary.

F.26.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 26.

SECTION G – SAFETY OF SPENT

FUEL MANAGEMENT

ARTICLE 4. GENERAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that at all stages of spent fuel management, individuals, society and the environment are adequately protected against radiological hazards. In so doing, each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to:

(i)ensure that criticality and removal of residual heat generated during spent fuel management are adequately addressed;

(ii)ensure that the generation of radioactive waste associated with spent fuel management is kept to the minimum practicable, consistent with the type of fuel cycle policy adopted;

(iii)take into account interdependencies among the different steps in spent fuel management;

(iv)provide for effective protection of individuals, society and the environment, by applying at the national level suitable protective methods as approved by the regulatory body, in the framework of its national legislation which has due regard to internationally endorsed criteria and standards;

(v)take into account the biological, chemical and other hazards that may be associated with spent fuel management;

(vi)strive to avoid actions that impose reasonably predictable impacts on future generations greater than those permitted for the current generation;

(vii)aim to avoid imposing undue burdens on future generations.

G.4 GENERAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 4.

The legislative and regulatory system in Sweden do not distinguish between general safety requirements for a facility for the management of spent nuclear fuel and the general safety requirements for a facility for the management of radioactive waste, as regards the objectives of the Joint Convention. Thus, in order not toduplicateinformationinthisreport,informationregardinggeneralsafetyrequirementsforanuclearfacility is presented in section H.11.

ARTICLE 5. EXISTING FACILITIES

EachContractingPartyshalltaketheappropriatestepstoreviewthesafetyof anyspentfuelmanagament facilityexistingatthetimetheConventionentersintoforceforthatContractingPartyandtoensurethat, if necessary, all reasonably practicable improvements are made to upgrade the safety of such a facility.

G.5	EXISTING FACILITIES
G.5.1	The regulatory requirements

The general safety regulations (SKIFS 1998:1 updated as SKIFS 2004:1) apply to the operation of all types of nuclear installations, including facilities for the treatment, storage and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The basic provisions regarding safety assessment and review can be summarised in the following points:

Safety Analysis

Analyses of conditions that are of importance for the safety of a facility shall be carried out before a facility is constructed and taken into operation. The analyses shall subsequently be kept up-to-date. The safety analyses shall be based on a systematic inventory of such events, event sequences and conditions that can lead to a radiological accident.

Safety Report

In the updating of the general safety regulations it has been clariﬁ ed that the safety report (SAR) shall reﬂ ect the plant as built, analysed and veriﬁ ed and show how the valid safety requirements are met. Plant modiﬁ cations shall be assessed against conditions described in the SAR. It has further been clariﬁ ed that all plant structures, systems and components of importance for the defence-in-depth shall be described in the SAR, not only the safety systems. New safety standards and practices, which have been assessed by the licensee and found applicable, shall be documented and inserted into the SAR as soon as corresponding modiﬁ cations or other plant measures have been taken. A few additional requirements on the contents of the SAR have also been added.

Safety Review

A safety review shall determine or control that the applicable safety related aspects of a speciﬁ c issue have been taken into account and that appropriate safety-related requirements in SKIFS 2004:1 with respect to the design,function,organisationandactivitiesof afacilityaremet.Thereviewshallbecarriedoutsystematically and shall be documented. A safety review shall be performed within the parts of the organisation, that are responsible for the speciﬁ c issues (”primary review”), as well as within a safety review function appointed for this purpose, that shall have an independent position relative to the parts of the organisation, that are responsible for the speciﬁ c issues (”secondary review”).

Safety Programme

After it is taken into operation, the safety of a facility shall be continuously analysed and assessed in a systematic manner. Any need for improvement of safety measures, engineering as well as organisational, which arises as a result of such analyses and assessments, shall be documented in a safety programme. The safety programme shall be updated on an annual basis.

Periodic Safety Review of Facilities

At least once in every ten years, a new, integrated analysis and assessment of the safety of a facility shall be made. The analyses, assessments as well as the measures proposed on the basis of these shall be documented and submitted to SKI. In the updating of the regulations, the requirements on Periodic Safety Review (PSR) have been made more stringent in order to use these reviews for assessment of time limited licensing conditions. This means that the Swedish approach to PSR becomes more in line with the European approach, where PSR is often used in the re-licensing of the nuclear power facilities.

Modiﬁ cations

A safety review shall be performed for engineering or organisational modiﬁ cations to a facility, which can affect the conditions speciﬁ ed in the safety report as well as essential modiﬁ cations to the report. Before the modiﬁ cations may be introduced, SKI shall be notiﬁ ed and the Inspectorate can decide that additional or other requirements or conditions shall apply with respect to the modiﬁcations.

G.5.2	Measures taken by the licence holders
G.5.2.1	Central Storage for Spent Nuclear Fuel (Clab)

The most important spent fuel facility in Sweden is the interim storage for spent nuclear fuel (Clab) located at the OKG site. SKB is the licensee for Clab and has made an agreement with OKG for operation of the facility. OKG has implemented the requirements in the general regulations SKIFS 2004:1 in its operating organisation.

Clab beneﬁ ts from this as the management system for the operation of Clab is fully integrated with the management system for the operation of the nuclear power plants at the OKG site. SKB, as the licensee for Clab, is ultimately responsible for the implementation of the new regulations and has closely monitored the development.

As accounted for in section F.21.2 the board of SKB has decided that SKB will take over the operation of Clab in the autumn of 2006. The organisational structure of SKB as well as the management system will then have to be amended to reﬂ ect this change.

Clab has been in operation since 1985. Prior to the introduction of the general regulations the requirement for a periodic safety review (PSR) was a condition in the NPP licences. In the general regulations SKIFS 2004:1, the requirement for periodic safety reviews is now mandatory for all nuclear facilities.

The fuel storage pools in Clab were expected to be completely ﬁ lled early 2004. Therefore in 1996 SKB initiated a project to increase the storage capacity from 5 000 to 8 000 tons of fuel by excavating a new rock cavern to provide additional storage pools. Although there was at the time no formal requirement to perform a periodic safety review, SKB decided, after consultation with SKI, to perform such a review. The main purpose was to gather experience from the construction and operation of the existing facility to be utilised in the design and construction of the extension. The so-called CLAB-ASAR 96 was submitted for review to SKI in 1997. In the report SKB identiﬁ ed 14 recommendations for improvement to the operation of Clab, and the regulatory review identiﬁ ed a few additional recommendations. The recommendations have been implemented for the most part.

The construction of the new storage pools was completed during 2004. SKB submitted an application for a licence to take the pools in operation in December 2004, supported by an updated safety report. SKI has requested amendments to the updated safety report and SKB plans to submit a new revision of the report in august 2005.

G.5.2.2

Storage of spent fuel from the research reactor R1 in Studsvik

Following the issuance of SKIFS 1998:1 revised safety reports and safety programmes have been submitted to SKI for review. An action plan has been submitted describing provisions for safe extended storage, as required by the regulatory authorities. The main alternative, though, is to send the spent fuel for reprocessing abroad and to use the recovered uranium and plutonium to manufacture MOX-fuel with the intention to be used in the Swedish nuclear power units in Oskarshamn.

G.5.3

Regulatory control

At the time that the Joint Convention entered into force, the general safety status of the Swedish spent nuclear facilities was satisfactory.

For a few years after the introduction of SKI general regulations SKIFS 1998:1, SKI’s review activities was focused on the implementation of the regulations. The regulations, revised as SKIFS 2004:1 and described in section E.19.2.4, provide a more structured approach to inspection and safety assessment, and have generally improved the situation. Extensive inspections of the safety review functions and fulﬁ lment of the competence assurance requirement have been carried out.

CompliancewiththerequirementsoncompetenceassuranceinthegeneralsafetyregulationsSKIFS1998:1 wasinspectedin2000atallthenuclearpowersites.Theseinspectionsshowedaneedforimprovedanalysistools, inordertodeﬁ necompetencerequirements,forotherpersonnelgroupsthanoperatingpersonnel,forwhoma systematicapproachhasbeenusedforseveralyears.Workwasinitiatedwithintheimplementingorganisations at all the sites to improve the analysis tools, and was in principle completed by the end of 2002.

The conclusions drawn by SKI from these inspections were that requirements on documentation of the new procedures were not fully met. There was some disagreement with the licensees about how to conduct theindependentsafetyreviewinrelationtotheprimaryreviews.Thisissuehasbeenaddressedinjointdiscussionswiththelicensees.Thesafetyprogrammesrequiredof eachlicenseeaccordingtoSKIFS1998:1,revised as SKIFS 2004:1, have been requested by SKI and were submitted by all sites in 2000.

SKI has monitored the extension works at Clab closely. The most critical part, the excavation of the new rock cavern close to the existing pools for spent fuel, was successfully completed by the end of 2000, and the civil and installation work was in principal completed in the end of 2004. SKB’s original plan was to have the new storage pools in operation at the beginning of 2004. The plan has been revised and the new pools are now expected to be commissioned in the end of 2005.

G.5.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 5.

ARTICLE 6. SITING OF PROPOSED FACILITIES

1.Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that procedures are established and implemented for a proposed spent fuel management facility:

(i)to evaluate all relevant site-related factors likely to affect the safety of such a facility during its operating lifetime;

(ii)to evaluate the likely safety impact of such a facility on individuals, society and the environment;

(iii)to make information on the safety of such a facility available to members of the public;

(iv)to consult Contracting Parties in the vicinity of such a facility, insofar as they are likely to be affected by that facility, and provide them, upon their request, with general data relating to the facility to enable them to evaluate the likely safety impact of the facility upon their territory.

2.In so doing, each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that such facilities shall not have unacceptable effects on other Contracting Parties by being sited in accordance with the general safety requirements of Article 4.

G.6 SITING OF PROPOSED FACILITIES

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 6.

The legislative and regulatory system in Sweden does not distinguish between the siting procedure for a facility for management of spent nuclear fuel and the siting procedure for a facility for management of radioactive waste, as regards the objectives of the Joint Convention. Thus, in order not to duplicate information in this report, information regarding the procedures for the siting of a nuclear facility is presented in section H.13.

ARTICLE 7. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that:

(i)the design and construction of a spent fuel management facility provide for suitable measures to limitpossibleradiologicalimpactsonindividuals,societyandtheenvironment,includingthosefrom discharges or uncontrolled releases;

(ii)atthedesignstage,conceptualplansand,asnecessary,technicalprovisionsforthedecommissioning of a spent fuel management facility are taken into account;

(iii)the technologies incorporated in the design and construction of a spent fuel management facility are supported by experience, testing or analysis.

G.7	DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
G.7.1	The regulatory requirements

The general safety regulations SKIFS 2004:1, apply to the operation of all types of nuclear installations, including facilities for the treatment, storage and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The basic provisions regarding safety assessment and review and can be summarised in the following points:

G.7.1.1

Suitable measures to limit radiological impact

The requirements for limiting the possible radiological impact on individuals, society and the environment, including those from discharges or uncontrolled releases, are founded upon the basic provisions stipulated in 4§ ﬁ rst paragraph in the Act on Nuclear Activities (1984:3). This is clariﬁ ed further in the revised general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) in which it is stated that nuclear accidents shall be prevented through a basic facility-speciﬁ c design that shall incorporate multiple barriers as well as a facility-speciﬁ c defence-in- depth system. Defence-in-depth shall be achieved by ensuring that:

-the design, construction, operation, monitoring and maintenance of a facility is such that abnormal events, incidents and accidents are prevented;

-multiple devices and measures exist to protect the integrity of the barriers and, if the integrity should be breached, to mitigate the ensuing consequences; and

-any release of radioactive substances, which may still occur as a result of abnormal events, incidents and accidents, is prevented or, if this is not possible, controlled and mitigated through devices and prepared measures.

G.7.1.2

Conceptual plans and provisions for decommissioning

The Act on Nuclear Activities states that the holder of a licence for nuclear activities is responsible for ensuring that all necessary measures are taken to ensure the safe handling and ﬁ nal disposal of nuclear waste, or nuclear material that is not reused, as well as the safe decommissioning and the dismantling of facilities.

The SKI general regulations has been updated and reissued as SKIFS 2004:1. A substantial change is that a chapter on decommissioning has been added with requirements on a decommissioning plan and a speciﬁ c operational safety assessment to be done as soon as a decision has been taken on ﬁ nal closure of a facility.

SSI regulations on Planning before and during decommissioning of nuclear facilities (SSI FS 2002:4) comprises requirements for decommissioning with respect to documentation, alternative actions and waste management (see section E.19.1.2).

G.7.1.3

Technology supported by experience

Therevisedgeneralsafetyregulations(SKIFS2004:1)specifyrequirementsregardingdesignandconstruction. It is stated that in order to meet the basic safety provisions the design of the facility, with adaptation to the speciﬁ c conditions of each facility, shall:

-be able to withstand component and system failures;

-have reliability and operational stability;

-be able to withstand such events or conditions which can affect the safety function of the barriers or defence-in-depth; and

-have maintainability, controllability and testability of inherent parts as long as these parts are used for their intended purposes.

Additional requirements related to design and construction are speciﬁ ed as follows:

-The design principles and design solutions shall be tested under conditions corresponding to those, which can occur during the intended application in a facility. If this is not possible or reasonable, they must have been subjected to the necessary testing or evaluation related to safety.

-The design solutions shall be adapted to the personnel’s ability to manage, the facility, in a safe manner, under normal conditions as well as the abnormal events, incidents and accidents that might occur.

-Building components, devices, components and systems shall be designed, manufactured, installed, controlled and tested in accordance with requirements, which are adapted for their importance for safety.

G.7.2	Measures taken by the licence holders
G.7.2.1	Suitable measures to limit radiological impact

The safety philosophy applied in the design of all Swedish nuclear facilities is based on the principles of defence-in-depth and of multiple barriers to prevent the release of radioactive material to the environment. Theyarealldesignedtofulﬁ ltheintentionof therequirementsintheGeneralDesignCriteria.Thefoundation of the safety principle on the defence in depth is emphasised and made clearer through the implementation of that principle in the SKI regulations SKIFS 1998:1, updated as SKIFS 2004:1.

G.7.2.2

Conceptual plans and provisions for decommissioning

Generic decommissioning plans have been developed by SKB, as part of the basis for the annual cost calculations (see section E.19.1.4). The ﬁ nal closure of Barsebäck 2 has caused the management of Barsebäck to initiate a more detailed study on the decommissioning of the site.

G.7.2.3

Technology supported by experience

The principle of proven technology is broadly accepted and implemented in the design and construction proceduresfortheSwedishnuclearfacilities.Theuseof properlyenvironmentallyqualiﬁ edequipmentensures functioning of safety-related systems and components under emergency conditions. A comprehensive programme for environmental qualiﬁ cation has been carried out. No major new steps are envisaged in addition to the previous programme, although research and development continues. In the modernisation work, the speciﬁ cation of all new installations is carefully checked with respect to environmental requirements.

Design of the encapsulation plant is proceeding in steps. The ongoing design step corresponds to the level of detail required in an application for a permit to build a plant. The design of an encapsulation plant at Clab has previously been carried out to this stage. The ongoing design process is thus a revision where experience from the Canister Laboratory, changes in the regulatory framework and technical progress are being incorporated in the design.

The goal is to design the repository for spent nuclear fuel, with associated infrastructure and activities, so that the stipulated requirements are satisﬁ ed. The repository facility is described in general terms in facility descriptions.Theyshowthelayoutandplacementof thesurfaceandundergroundpartsandthecoordination betweenthem.Anaccountisalsogivenof thevehicles,machines,etc.,thatareneededinthefacility,including technical systems and installations required for construction and operation.

Facility descriptions are important supporting documents for planning of the construction phase, reliability analysis, system analysis, safety assessment and environmental impact assessment (EIA). The facility descriptions that are prepared after the complete site investigation programme will serve as a basis for applications for permits for the repository for spent nuclear fuel under the Environmental Code and the Nuclear Activities Act.

Preparation of main and engineering documents will begin during the application period and will then continue during the construction phase. There are no equivalent standards and regulations governing the design of the underground part’s rock caverns. SKB has therefore issued a document called “Deep repository, Underground Design Premises”. This document describes the methodology for design and includes descriptions of and/or references to:

-the premises on which design is to be based, the design premises;

-how design is to be carried out;

-how the results of design are to be veriﬁ ed; and

-how the results of design are to be documented.

The methodologies for designing the two parts of the repository, the surface part and the underground part, are different. The surface part is more or less a conventional industrial facility and will comply with existing

standards and regulations governing buildings and mechanical and electrical installations. The repository facilityisalsoanuclearinstallation,whichwillbetakenintoaccountinpreparingthedesign-controllingdocu- ments for the technical systems and in designing, for example, the special access protection for the facility’s underground part. The methodology for design of the underground part that has been used and reﬁ ned in a pilot project will be applied in the design work during the site investigation phase.

Both the Canister laboratory and the Äspö laboratory have been used for several years in developing technologies for encapsulation and disposal of spent fuel. This experience is and will be used, together with the possibilities for testing and analysis, when the encapsulation plant and the repository for spent nuclear fuel are designed and constructed.

G.7.3

Regulatory control

DuringthelicensingprocessthePSAR,FSARandSTFdocumentsarereviewedbytheregulatoryauthorities, to ensure compliance with fundamental safety principles and criteria. A prerequisite for obtaining a licence is that the regulatory review concludes that the facility is designed according to the provisions in the revised general regulations (SKIFS 2004:1).

G.7.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 7.

ARTICLE 8. ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY OF FACILITIES

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that:

(i)before construction of a spent fuel management facility, a systematic safety assessment and an environmental assessment appropriate to the hazard presented by the facility and covering its operating lifetime shall be carried out;

(ii)before the operation of a spent fuel management facility, updated and detailed versions of the safety assessment and of the environmental assessment shall be prepared when deemed necessary to complement the assessments referred to in paragraph (i).

G.8	ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY OF FACILITIES
G.8.1	The regulatory requirement
G.8.1.1	Assessment of safety

Requirements on safety assessment, safety review and reporting are listed in the revised general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1). Many of these requirements are not new but were posed earlier as licensing conditions for facilities licensed before the regulations came into force. Some of the requirements are, however, more comprehensivecomparedtoearlierconditions,andsomearenew.Thelegallybindingrequirementsregarding safety assessments are summarised in the following points:

-A comprehensive safety analysis shall be performed before a facility is constructed and before it is taken into operation. The analysis shall subsequently be kept up-to-date. The analysis shall be based on a systematic inventory of events, event sequences and conditions, which can lead to a radiological accident.

-A preliminary safety report shall be prepared before a facility may be constructed, and a ﬁ nal safety report shall be prepared before the facility may be taken into operation. The safety reports shall contain informationasspeciﬁ edintheregulations.Thepreliminaryandtheﬁ nalsafetyreportsshallbereviewed, evaluated and approved by SKI as required. The ﬁ nal safety report shall be kept up-to-date.

G.8.1.2

Environmental assessment

The Act on Nuclear activities also states that an EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) shall be made in all licensing cases, and that the Environmental Code regulates the way the EIA shall be carried out as well as the contents of the documentation. Requirements on environmental assessment are laid down in the Environmental Code (1998:808) as described in Section E.19.1.3. The purpose of an EIA is to establish and describe the direct and indirect impacts of a planned activity or measure as listed below.

An environmental impact statement shall contain the following information:

-a description of the activity or measure with details of its location, design and scope;

-theinformationthatisneededtoestablishandassessthemajorimpactonhumanhealth,theenvironment and the management of land, water and other resources that the activity or measure is likely to have;

-a description of possible alternative sites and alternative designs, together with a statement of the reasons why a speciﬁ c alternative was chosen as well as a description of the consequences if the activity or measure is not implemented; and

-a non-technical summary of the information.

G.8.1.3

The licensing procedure

Three different permits/licences are required for a nuclear facility: a permit under the Environmental Code (1998:808) a licence under the Nuclear Activities Act (1984:3), and a building permit under the Planning and Building Act (1987:10). Licensing under the Environmental Code and the Act on Nuclear Activities occur in parallel. The applications under both laws must include an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared according to the rules in Chapter 6 of the Environmental Code. The same EIS is thus used in both applications. Separate EISs are prepared for the encapsulation plant and the repository for spent nuclear fuel.

Government shall also examine permit applications under the Act on Nuclear Activities. If the Government ﬁ nds that the construction and operation of the facility is permissible according to the Environmental Code andgrantsapermit/licenceundertheNuclearActivitiesAct,itremainsfortheEnvironmentalCourttogrant a permit/licence and stipulate conditions in accordance with the Environmental Code.

G.8.2

Measures taken by the licence holders

SKB R&D-programme is focused on an application to site and construct a repository for spent nuclear fuel and an encapsulation plant (see also section A.3.2). The main goal of the long-term research activities conducted by SKB is to understand how different processes (long-term changes) may affect a repository’s performance. The results from research activities are used in the safety case.

Work is at present proceeding on the safety assessment report to be submitted as supporting argument for an application to site and construct an encapsulation plant (SR-Can). The main goal of SR-Can is to prove that encapsulation of canisters (sealing and testing) is possible to carry out with available and demonstrated technique, and that the canisters provide adequate barrier function in the repository, given the repository environment. Experimental data from the demonstration phase of the work in particular will therefore comprise an important part of the input data for SR-Can.

Another, updated, safety assessment report will be submitted as supporting argument for an application to site and construct a repository for spent nuclear fuel (SR-Site). The main goal with SR-Site is to prove that the total body of material available satisﬁ es the regulatory requirements regarding long-term safety. The planning for SR-Site is still at an early stage. The intention is to perform a safety assessment for two sites, to the equivalent level.

An interim safety assessment report (SR-Can Interim Report) was published in 2004 with the purpose to present the methodology for a safety assessment for a spent nuclear fuel repository. The report demonstrates both the methodology as such and plans for how different problems are intended to be solved.

Measures taken and planning for consultations and environmental impact statement (EIS) are described in section H.13.2.

G.8.3

Regulatory control

The safety case as a basis for licensing and nuclear supervision.

The safety level to be attained and maintained by the licensee of a nuclear facility is deﬁ ned in the licensing process.

The licence to build, be in possession of and operate the facility is granted by the Government. This government licensing decision is applied forand granted early in the design process. These licence conditions requires that a preliminary safety analysis report (PSAR) be submitted and approved by the regulatory body before major construction activities are started. A ﬁ nal safety analysis report (FSAR) and technical speciﬁ - cations for operation (STF) should also be submitted and approved by the regulatory body before starting commercial operation.

The PSAR, FSAR and STF documents are reviewed by the regulatory authorities, to ensure compliance with fundamental safety principles and criteria. Based on this licensing procedure, and on approval by the regulatory authorities, the FSAR and STF documents becomes the legally binding documents regulating technical conﬁ guration and operating limits and conditions, often referred to as ”the safety case”. This ”safety case” may be regarded as deﬁ ning the minimum safety level that the licensee is legally committed to maintain as a condition for a permit to operate the facility. Hence, the safety case also provides the basis for regulatory supervision.

Additional licence conditions can be prescribed by SKI over time, based on national and international operating experience and new research results.

G.8.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 8.

ARTICLE 9. OPERATION OF FACILITIES

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that:

(i)the licence to operate a spent fuel management facility is based upon appropriate assessments as speciﬁ ed in Article 8 and is conditional on the completion of a commissioning programme demonstrating that the facility, as constructed, is consistent with design and safety requirements;

(ii)operational limits and conditions derived from tests, operational experience and the assessments, as speciﬁ ed in Article 8, are deﬁ ned and revised as necessary;

(iii)operation, maintenance, monitoring, inspection and testing of a spent fuel management facility are conducted in accordance with established procedures;

(iv)engineering and technical support in all safety-related ﬁ elds are available throughout the operating lifetime of a spent fuel management facility;

(v)incidents signiﬁ cant to safety are reported in a timely manner by the holder of the licence to the regulatory body;

(vi)programmes to collect and analyse relevant operating experience are established and that the results are acted upon, where appropriate;

(vii)decommissioningplansforaspentfuelmanagementfacilityarepreparedandupdated,asnecessary, using information obtained during the operating lifetime of that facility, and are reviewed by the regulatory body.

G 9	OPERATION OF FACILITIES
G.9.1	The regulatory requirements

The revised general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) contain legally binding requirements relevant for all obligations of Article 9. These requirements are summarised below.

G.9.1.1

Initial authorisation

As mentioned in section G.8, a preliminary comprehensive safety report is required before the construction of a spent nuclear facility. A ﬁ nal complete safety analysis report, which also takes into account the results from commissioning tests, is required before the facility is taken into operation.

G.9.1.2

Operational limits and conditions

Documented up-to-date Technical Speciﬁ cations are required containing the necessary operational limits and conditions, as further speciﬁ ed in a separate appendix to the regulations. The Technical Speciﬁ cations shall together with the operating procedures ensure that the conditions postulated in the safety report are maintained during the operation of the facility. The Technical Speciﬁ cations shall be subjected to a twofold safety review by the licensee and submitted to SKI for approval. The licensee shall notify SKI about any changes, after they have been subjected to a two-fold safety review.

G.9.1.3

Established procedures

Suitable, veriﬁ ed and documented procedures are required for all operational states including accidents. The proceduresforoperabilityveriﬁ cationandproceduresusedinotheroperationalstatesthannormaloperation shall be subjected to a twofold safety review by the licensee. Procedures for maintenance important for safety are also covered by the requirement. Maintenance programmes shall be documented. Inspection and testing of mechanical components shall be carried out according to qualiﬁ ed methods and veriﬁ ed procedures.

G.9.1.4

Engineering and technical support

The licensee shall ensure that adequate personnel is available with the necessary competence and suitability needed for those tasks which are important for safety, and also ensure that this is documented. A long-term stafﬁ ng plan is required. The use of contractors as opposed to own personnel should be carefully considered in order to develop and maintain adequate in-house competence. The necessary competence should always exist in-house for ordering, managing and evaluating the results of work carried out by contractors of importance for safety.

G.9.1.5

Reporting of incidents in a timely manner

TherevisedgeneralregulationsSKIFS2004:1containonechapteraboutreportingrequirementsandanannex specifying these requirements for various types of events. The following is a brief summary:

-reporting without delay: emergency alarm events and events and conditions in category 1 (see below);

-reporting within 16 hours: INES events at level 2 or higher;

-reportingwithin7days:acomprehensiveinvestigationreportaboutalarmeventsoreventsandconditions in category; and

-reporting within 30 days: a comprehensive investigation report of events and conditions in category 2.

In addition, there are requirements on daily reporting of the operational state, and the occurrence of any abnormal events or disturbances, and requirements on a comprehensive annual report summarising all experience important for the safety of the plant. Speciﬁ cations are given about the contents of the different reports and further interpretation of the reporting requirements is given in the general recommendations.

In one of the basic paragraphs of SKIFS 2004:1, requirements are given on actions to be taken by the licensee in cases of deﬁ ciencies in barriers or in the defence-in depth system. These actions include ﬁ rst assessment, adjustment of the operational state, implementation of necessary measures, performance of safety reviews and reporting to SKI. A graded approach is allowed here. In appendix 1 of the regulations, events and conditions are speciﬁ ed which require different responses, depending on the category of events they belong to. Three categories are deﬁ ned in this annex:

• Category 1

Severedeﬁ ciencyobservedinoneormorebarriersorinthedefence-in-depthsystem,aswellasafoundedsuspicion that safety is severely threatened. (In these cases the facility must be brought to a safe state without delay.)

• Category 2

Deﬁ ciency observed in one barrier or in the defence-in-depth system, which is less severe than that which is referred to in category 1, as well as a founded suspicion that safety is threatened. (In these cases the facility is allowed to continue operation under certain limitations and controls.)

• Category 3

Inallthreecases,correctivemeasuresshallbesubjecttoatwofoldsafetyreviewbythelicensee.Theresults of these reviews shall be submitted to SKI. Regarding category 3 events, there is no requirement to make a speciﬁ c report to SKI. It is sufﬁ cient to make a compilation of these events in the annual report.

G.9.1.6

Programmes to collect and analyse operating experience

The licensee shall ensure that experience from its own facilities and from similar activities in other relevant facilities is continuously analysed, used and communicated to the personnel. It is further required that all events and conditions which are detected and which are important to safety are investigated in a systematic manner, in order to determine sequences and causes, as well as to establish the measures needed in order to restore the safety margins and to prevent recurrence. The results of the investigations shall be disseminated within the organisation and shall contribute to the development of safety at the facility.

G.9.1.7

Decommissioning plans

In the revised general regulations SKIFS 2004:1 a chapter on decommissioning has been added with requirements on:

-a preliminary plan for the future decommissioning of the facility to be compiled as before construction of a facility;

-the decommissioning plan to be supplemented and incorporated into the facility’s safety report before the dismantling of the facility may be initiated; and

-a decommissioning plan and a speciﬁ c operational safety assessment to be done as soon as a decision has been taken on ﬁ nal closure of a facility.

The plan should include measures, which must be implemented to ensure the safe containment of the generated nuclear waste.

G.9.2

Measures taken by the licence holders

Thegeneralsafetyregulations(SKIFS2004:1)containlegallybindingrequirementsrelevantforallobligations of Article 9. These requirements are summarised below.

G.9.2.1 Initial authorisation

No spent nuclear facility has been commissioned since 1985 when the central interim storage for spent fuel (Clab) was taken into operation. The application procedure for the recent extension works to increase the capacity from 5 000 to 8 000 tons of uranium, is the ﬁ rst time the modernised legislative and regulatory system has been implemented.

Although neither the Environmental Code, the new SKI regulations 1998:1 (revised as SKIFS 2004:1) and 2002:1, nor the new Radiation Protection Act had been issued at the time for the application, the formal procedure to initiate the project was run according to procedures later established by the issuance of those documents, as described in sections E.19 (Legislative and regulatory framework), E.20 (Regulatory Body) and G.6 (Siting of proposed facilities).

The siting process for the encapsulation plant, and the ﬁ nal repository for spent nuclear fuel (SFL-2), has already been initiated in accordance with the procedures outlined in this document. A preliminary time schedule for the required activities is presented in the introduction of this document. The procedure is described in detail in section H.13.

G.9.2.2 Operational limits and conditions

The operational limits and conditions for nuclear facilities are described in the Technical Speciﬁ cations (STF), a document, which is considered to be one of the cornerstones in the governing and regulation of the operation of the Swedish nuclear activities. Every STF is facility-speciﬁ c and is approved by SKI as part of the licensing conditions.

The original STF for each facility is derived from the safety analyses in the FSAR, in which the behaviour of the facility is described. Correction and updating takes place, when new and better knowledge is available, either from research, tests or operational experience. Suggestions for changes in STF are reviewed carefully from the safety point of view at different levels in the operating organisation and are ﬁ nally approved by the regulatory body, before they are included in the document.

The fact that STF is reviewed and revised regularly has contributed to making it a living document. It is also part of the quality and management system and used frequently in particular by the operations staff. An essential part of STF is the general clause that says that ”…should any doubt appear about the interpretation of the text, the general purpose of STF shall be guiding. This means that the facility in all indeﬁ nite situations shall be maintained or brought respectively to a safe state.” Other parts of STF, which have been developed more recently, is the descriptive background to the document. The background description is important for preserving and transferred to new staff the knowledge and experience of those who participated in the original production of STF. Modiﬁ ed and maintained equipment must pass an operability test, to verify that the equipment fulﬁ ls speciﬁ ed operational requirements before being accepted for continuous operation.

G.9.2.3 Established procedures

All activities that directly affect the operation of the facility are governed by procedures of different kinds covering normal operation, emergency operation and functional tests. Maintenance activities according to an approvedmaintenanceprogrammearealsotoagreatextentaccomplishedaccordingtoprocedures,however, not always as detailed as the operating procedures, in which activities are described in sequences step by step. Signing off the completion of steps carried out in the procedures is mandatory in most cases, in order to conﬁ rm the completion and facilitate veriﬁ cation.

Thedevelopmentof proceduresfollowsspeciﬁ eddirectives,whichincludethereviewingof thedocuments, normally, by more than one person other than the author, before being approved by the operations manager or someone else at the corresponding level. The same applies for revising procedures. Revising procedures is to be carried out continuously, in particular maintenance procedures, when new experience is obtained. Emergency procedures have been developed in order to deal with anticipated operational events.

G.9.2.4

Engineering and technical support

Theprinciplesforstafﬁ ngarereportedinsectionF.22(Humanandﬁ nancialresources).Competencethatmight not be completely available within the own organisation at all plants is for instance expertise and resources

for materials and chemistry assessments, radiation shielding and environmental consequence calculations, expertise and resources for software for safety applications and also process control and measurement techniques. In particular the IT-functions have normally been outsourced, but are still available on-site. The intention is always to have the ordering competence within the operating organisation, and the capability of evaluating the results of analyses, calculations, etc., performed by consultants.

G.9.2.5

Incident reporting

Incidents signiﬁ cant to safety are reported according to the non-routine reporting requirements in the technical speciﬁ cations (see section G.19.1.5). Two types of licensee event reports (LER) exist. The more severe one, called abnormal event, requires the facility to inform SKI, and in some cases also SSI, within an hour. A ﬁ nal report shall be submitted within ten days from the time of the event and the analysis of the event and appropriate measures to prevent recurrence shall be approved by SKI. Only a very limited number of events of this category have occurred at the Swedish facilities over the years. These events are typically also of such a dignity as to warrant reporting in accordance with the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES).

The other type of LER, called RO (Reportable Occurrence), is used for less severe events. This type of event is mentioned in the daily report, which is sent to the regulatory bodies, followed up by a preliminary report within seven days and a ﬁ nal report within 30 days. The reports are reviewed at different levels within the operating organisation and approved by the operations or production manager before submittal.

The front of the standardised report form describes the event in general: identiﬁ cation number, title, reference to STF, date of discovery and length of time until corrective actions were completed, conditions at the time of occurrence, system consequences, a contact person at the plant and activities affected by the event.

On the reverse side of the document a description of the event is given. The following titles are used:

-event course and operational consequence;

-safety signiﬁ cance;

-direct and root causes;

-planned/decided measures; and

-lessons learned by the event.

If the description of the event is extensive additional pages may be attached to the form. Reports are also required in accordance with STF when the permitted levels of activity release from the facility are exceeded, or in the event of unusually high radiation exposure to individuals. These types of non-routine reporting are primarily directed towards SSI.

G.9.2.6

Operating experience analysis and feed-back

The objective of the analysis and feedback programme concerning operating experience is to learn from their own and others’ experience and thus prevent recurrences of events, particularly those that might affect the safety of the facility. The operating experience feed-back process consists of a wide variety of activities within the plant organisation as well as externally.

G.9.2.7

Decommissioning plans

AsdescribedinsectionG.7.2.2,aconceptualdecommissioningplanforClabhasbeenpreparedandisupdated as needed. The plan constitutes the basis for the nuclear power utilities’ cost estimates for dismantling and ﬁ nal disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste.

G.9.3	Regulatory control
G.9.3.1	Initial authorisation

The regulatory control is achieved through the procedures described in sections E.19.2.1 (Licensing) and E.19.2.2 (Institutional control, regulatory inspection and reporting).

G.9.3.2

Operational limits and conditions

Applications for changes to STF, and for exemptions from STF, are reviewed by inspectors and specialists at SKI. Based on the application and information provided by the licensees, and the associated safety analyses, assessments are made about how the proposed changes or exemptions contribute to the risk proﬁ le of the facility.

A few years ago SKI inspected the training and retraining in STF of operational, maintenance and technical support personnel. Included in the inspection was how documentation was used and kept up to date. SKI concluded that the use of STF was well understood and the training of operational personnel was well organised.Howeveritwasfoundthatthetrainingcouldbeimprovedforothergroupswhocomeintocontact with the requirements of STF, for instance personnel in the maintenance and chemical departments. It was also concluded that updating STF was sometimes slow, due to limited staff resources and that consultants were often used for this important task.

G.9.3.3 Procedures

Operational and maintenance procedures are normally not reviewed by SKI. Only in connection with event investigations would SKI ask for a procedure to be submitted for review. In the frame of quality assurance inspections or reviews of quality audits made by the licensees (see section F.23) have SKI reviewed into the routines used for updating procedures.

G.9.3.4

Engineering and technical support

SKIhasnotsofarspeciﬁ callyinspectedtheengineeringandtechnicalsupportavailableatthefacilities.Inconnection with other inspections and reviews, the stafﬁ ng situation has occasionally been commented upon.

G.9.3.5

Incident reporting

Licensee event reports, LERs, are reviewed upon arrival by the responsible site inspector, who asks the facility for clariﬁ cation if necessary. As a routine all LERs are screened once a week by a standing group of inspectors and specialists in order to assess the event, the analysis and the measures taken by the licensee. If there are any regulatory concerns the issue is brought up at a management meeting and a decision made about any further measures to be taken by SKI.

G.9.3.6

Experience feedback analysis

The major operating experience feedback comes from within the organisation itself and consequently the largest analysis effort is focused on the events in their own facility. The RO reports constitute an essential input into this analysis task, together with speciﬁ c operating experience reports that are written for events not meeting the RO criteria, or so called near-events. MTO analysis is used, when root-causes and analysis in-depth are deemed necessary or desirable.

G.9.3.7

Decommissioning plans

Decommissioningplans(seesectionG.9.1.7)mustbesubmittedtoSKIforapprovalbeforedecommissioning and dismantling activities may be started.

G.9.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 9.

ARTICLE 10. DISPOSAL OF SPENT FUEL

If, pursuant to its own legislative and regulatory framework, a Contracting Party has designated spent fuel for disposal, the disposal of such spent fuel shall be in accordance with the obligations of Chapter 3 relating to the disposal of radioactive waste.

G.10 DISPOSAL OF SPENT FUEL

G.10.1

Regulatory requirement

According to the Act on Nuclear Activities the following deﬁ nitions apply:

-spent nuclear fuel which has not been placed in ﬁ nal storage is deﬁ ned as nuclear material; and

-spent nuclear fuel which has been placed in ﬁ nal storage is deﬁ ned as nuclear waste.

Reprocessing is not part of the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle in Sweden, as described in section C, and the policy and practices for management of spent nuclear fuel is direct disposal, as described in section B.

It is also clearly stated in the general obligations in the Act on Nuclear Activities (10 §) that the holder of a licence for nuclear activities shall be responsible for ensuring that all measures are taken needed for:

-maintaining safety, with reference to the nature of the activities and the manner in which they are conducted; and

-ensuringthesafehandlingandﬁ naldisposalof nuclearwastearisingfromtheactivitiesornuclearmaterial arising therein that is not reused.

G.10.2 Measures taken by the licence holders

The practical implication is that spent fuel is in practice treated as high level radioactive waste.

G.10.3 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 10.

SECTION H – SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT

ARTICLE 11. GENERAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that at all stages of radioactive waste management individuals, society and the environment are adequately protected against radiological and other hazards. In so doing, each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to:

(i)ensure that criticality and removal of residual heat generated during radioactive waste management are adequately addressed;

(ii)ensure that the generation of radioactive waste is kept to the minimum practicable;

(iii)take into account interdependencies among the different steps in radioactive waste management;

(v)take into account the biological, chemical and other hazards that may be associated with radioactive waste management;

(vi)strive to avoid actions that impose reasonably predictable impacts on future generations greater than those permitted for the current generation;

(vii)aim to avoid imposing undue burdens on future generations.

H.11 GENERAL SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

Swedish legislation makes a distinction between radioactive waste originating from nuclear activities (spent fuel and nuclear waste) and radioactive waste emanating from activities outside the nuclear fuel cycle, e.g. medicaluse,industry,researchandconsumerproducts,etc.(deﬁ nitionsof radioactivewasteandnuclearwaste according to Swedish law are given in section E.19). However, the legislative and regulatory systems do not distinguish between the general safety requirements for a facility for the management of radioactive waste and general safety requirements for a facility for the management of spent nuclear fuel, with regards to the objectives of the Joint Convention. Thus, in order not to duplicate information in this report, information regarding the general safety requirements of a nuclear facility described in this section are not repeated in section G.4.

H.11.1

Regulatory requirements

Basic safety provisions are stipulated in the Act on Nuclear Activities (1984:3). The requirements are further clariﬁ ed in the general safety regulations SKIFS 2004:1. In the regulations it is stated that, in order to ensure adequate protection at all stages of spent fuel management, the licensee shall:

1.establish documented guidelines for how safety shall be maintained at the facility as well as ensure that the personnel performing duties which are important to safety are well acquainted with the guidelines;

2.ensure that the activities carried out at the facility are controlled and developed with the support of a quality system which covers those activities which are of importance for safety;

3.ensure that decisions on safety-related issues are preceded by adequate investigation and consultation so that the issues are comprehensively examined;

4.ensure that adequate personnel is available with the necessary competence and suitability on all respects needed for those tasks which are of importance for safety as well as ensure that this is documented;

5.ensure that responsibilities and authority are deﬁ ned and documented with respect to personnel carrying out work which is important to safety;

6.ensure that the personnel is provided with the necessary conditions to work in a safe manner;

7.ensure that experience from the facility’s own and from similar activities is continuously utilised and communicated to the personnel concerned; and

8.ensure that safety, through these and other measures, is maintained and continuously developed.

IntheRadiationProtectionAct(1988:220)itisstipulatedthatradioactivewasteshallbehandledanddisposed of in a manner that is satisfactory from a radiation protection point of view. More detailed requirements on the handling of radioactive waste and nuclear waste at nuclear facilities are stipulated in SSI FS 2001:1.

The regulations put requirements on waste management plans and registration of waste and reporting to the SSI. At the facility a register shall be kept over waste that without further treatment is to be transferred to ﬁ nal disposal in Sweden or is intended to be temporarily stored for more than two years. The register shall be subdivided into items such as packages, components, containers or other units corresponding to the handling of the waste.

For each item the register shall contain information on:

1.identity;

2.the origin of the waste or what part or parts of the facility it comes from;

3.the treatment of the waste and its physical and chemical form;

4.the amount of waste;

5.the nuclide speciﬁ c content of radioactive substances and a date of reference;

6.the level of external radiation at a speciﬁ ed distance and date;

7.the storage position; and

8.the date of treatment (for waste intended to be temporarily stored for more than two years the date for intended treatment shall be recorded).

A report concerning the past calendar year shall be sent to SSI. The report shall comprise a summary of:

1.which amount of waste that has arisen or by other means has been brought to the facility;

2.waste that has been registered according to section 6;

3.waste that has been transferred to ﬁ nal disposal or has been transported away from the facility;

4.waste that at the turn of the year exists at the facility and information on its position; and

5.experiences of the handling of the waste and a follow-up of the plans established.

There are also regulations on the protection of human health and the environment in connection with the ﬁ nal management of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste (SSI FS 1998:1). The purpose of these regulations is to limit the harmful effects on human health and the environment in connection with the ﬁ nal disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. Discharges to air and water from a facility to the surrounding environment are regulated in SSI FS 2000:12 (see section F.24.1.2).

In addition there are requirements concerning the long-term safety of a repository in SKI’s regulations SKIFS 2002:1. According to the regulations, the safety assessment for a repository should also comprise features, events and processes that can lead to the dispersion of radioactive substances after closure.

As presented in section E.19.1.2 SSI has also issued regulations concerning clearance of nuclear and nonnuclear waste, SSI FS 1996:2 and SSI FS 1983:7, respectively.

H.11.1.1

Criticality and removal of residual heat

The revised general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) state that radiological accidents shall be prevented by the design, construction, operation, monitoring and maintenance of a facility. It follows that a criticality analysis as well as an analysis of heat generation and removal of residual heat must be included in the safety report supporting the licence application for any nuclear facility.

The licence application for Clab included a criticality analysis as well as an analysis of heat generation. A re-assessment of both the criticality analyses and heat generation was performed and submitted in the application for ongoing extension works.

H.11.1.2

Interdependencies in waste management and minimisation of radioactive waste

The fact that the licence-holders are responsible for the handling and disposal of the radioactive waste they generate provides an incentive to consider all steps from waste generation to disposal. Detailed requirements are stipulated in both SKI’s and SSI’s regulations:

-An up-to-date inventory of all spent fuel and radioactive waste on-site (SKIFS 2004:1 and SSI FS 2002:1).

-Measures for the safe on-site handling, storage or disposal of waste shall be analysed and included in the safety report of the facility. The measures for on-site handling shall consider the requirements on safety posedbythecontinuedhandling,transportanddisposalof thewaste.Thesafetyreportshallalsoinclude measures, which need to be taken on-site to prepare for the safe transportation, storage or disposal in a nuclear waste facility (SKIFS 2004:1).

-If such waste is generated that does not conform to the speciﬁ cations in the safety report, measures for the safe handling of this particular waste shall be documented and SKI notiﬁ ed before any measures are taken. The documentation is subject to a twofold safety review by the licensee before notiﬁ cation (SKIFS 2004:1).

100

-Plans shall be established for the handling and disposal of all waste that exists at the facility, arises at the facility or in other ways is brought to the facility. The plans shall include e.g. amounts of different categories of waste, estimated nuclide specific content and sorting, treatment and interim storage of the waste. The plans shall be reported to the authorities before the waste is generated (SSI FS 2001:1).

-Thepossibilitythatradiationdosestopersonnelcanincreasewhenreleasestotheenvironmentarelimited shall be taken into account during optimisation, as shall the consequences of other waste management alternatives (SSI FS 2000:12).

-Human health and the environment shall be protected from detrimental effects of ionising radiation, during the time when various stages of the ﬁ nal management of spent nuclear fuel or nuclear waste are being implemented as well as in the future (SSI FS 1998:1).

H.11.1.3

Protection of individuals, society and the environment

General radiation protection provisions are described in section F.24.1.

SSI has particularly addressed radiation protection of the public and the environment in connection with radioactivewastemanagementinthreedifferentregulations(SSIFS1998:1,2000:12and2001:1,seeE.19.1.2). In summary it is required that:

-a repository for spent nuclear fuel or nuclear waste shall be designed so that the annual risk of harmful effects after closure does not exceed 10-6 for a representative individual in the group exposed to the greatest risk;

-the ﬁ nal management of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste shall be implemented so that biodiversity and the sustainable use of biological resources are protected: and

-human health and the environment shall be protected during the operation of a nuclear facility as well as in the future.

H.11.1.4 Biological, chemical and other hazards

An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be submitted together with an application for a licence accordingtotheActonNuclearActivitiesandtheRadiationProtectionAct,asaccountedforinsectionE.19. It is stated in the general considerations in the Environmental Code that due consideration shall be taken to possible effects from chemical, biological and other hazards. It follows that chemical, biological and other hazards during the operation of a nuclear facility must be addressed in the EIS.

As stated in H.11.1.2 both SSI and SKI require that up-dated registers be kept for all waste and spent nuclear fuel at a nuclear facility. The registers shall for every waste item (e.g. package or component) include information on, among other things, the treatment and the physical and chemical form of the waste.

Thequestionof chemicalandbiologicalhazardswithregardtothelong-termperformanceof arepository is addressed in SKIFS 2002:1.

Only packages approved by SKI and SSI may be transported to a repository. For this approval, the waste must comply with the conditions stated in the safety report of the repository. Furthermore, the licensee has to submit documentation showing that due regard has been taken to all relevant aspects, including biological, chemical and other hazards with regard to the long-term performance of the repository.

H.11.1.5 Strive to avoid actions that impose impacts on future generations

One purpose of SSI FS 2001:1 is to limit the harmful effects of radiation from the waste today and in the future. In SSI FS 2000:12 it is also stated that human health and the environment shall be protected from the harmful effects of ionising radiation during the operation of a nuclear facility as well as in the future. SSI FS 1998:1 has general requirements stipulating that human health and the environment shall be protected from detrimental effects of ionising radiation, during the time when various stages of the ﬁ nal management of spent nuclear fuel or nuclear waste are being implemented as well as in the future. All these regulations strive to avoid actions that impose reasonably predictable impacts on future generations greater than those permitted for the current generation.

H.11.1.6

Aim to avoid imposing undue burdens on future generations

As described in section E.19 the practices for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste are governed by principles adopted by the Swedish Parliament.

The ﬁ rst governing principle reads ”The expenses for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste are to be covered by revenues from the production of energy that has resulted in these expenses.”

101

The second principle reads ”The reactor owners are to safely dispose of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste.”

The key words (underlined) imply that burden on future generations should be avoided, especially with regard to the fundamental aspects of safety and costs. The key words also imply that action should be taken without postponement, i.e. the generation that has beneﬁ ted from the nuclear power generation should also deal with the management of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste.

The holder of a licence to operate a nuclear facility is primarily responsible for the safe handling and disposal of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste, as well as decommissioning and dismantling the facility. The nuclear industry, through its co-owned company SKB, has performed research on the ﬁ nal storage of radioactive waste since the mid-1970s. During the 1990s the research was intensiﬁ ed with extensive feasibility studies (in eight municipalities). In 2001–2002 two municipalities approved further investigations.

According to SKB plans, investigations of the bedrock will be carried out at these two sites over the next ﬁ ve years. SKB plans to submit a licence application for siting and construction of the ﬁ nal repository in 2008. Waste emplacement could begin 2017.

H.11.2 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 11.

102

ARTICLE 12. EXISTING FACILITIES AND PAST PRACTICES

Each Contracting Party shall in due course take the appropriate steps to review:

(i)the safety of any radioactive waste management facility existing at the time the Convention enters into force for that Contracting Party and to ensure that, if necessary, all reasonably practicable improvements are made to upgrade the safety of such a facility;

(ii)the results of past practices in order to determine whether any intervention is needed for reasons of radiation protection bearing in mind that the reduction in detriment resulting from the reduction in dose should be sufﬁ cient to justify the harm and the costs, including the social costs, of the intervention.

H. 12	EXISTING FACILITIES AND PAST PRACTICES
H.12.1	The regulatory requirement
H.12.1.1	The general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1)

ThegeneralsafetyregulationsSKIFS2004:1,applytotheoperationof alltypesof nuclearinstallations,including facilities for treatment, storage and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste. The basic provisions regarding safety assessment and review and can be summarised in the following points:

Safety Analysis

Safety Report

A preliminary safety report shall be prepared before a facility may be constructed. A ﬁ nal safety report shall be prepared before the facility may be taken into operation. The content of the safety report is speciﬁ ed in the regulations. Before the facility may be constructed and taken into operation, the safety report shall be evaluated and approved by SKI. The safety report shall subsequently be kept up-to-date. In the updating of the regulations it has been clariﬁ ed that the safety report (SAR) shall reﬂ ect the plant as built, analysed and veriﬁ ed and show how the valid safety requirements are met. Plant modiﬁ cations shall be assessed against conditionsdescribedintheSAR.Ithasfurtherbeenclariﬁ edthatallplantstructures,systemsandcomponents of importanceforthedefence-in-depthshallbedescribedintheSAR,notonlythesafetysystems.Newsafety standards and practices, which have been assessed by the licensee and found applicable, shall be documented and inserted into the SAR as soon as corresponding modiﬁ cations or other plant measures have been taken. A few additional requirements on the contents of the SAR have also been added.

Safety Review

A safety review shall determine or check that the applicable safety related aspects of a speciﬁ c issue have been taken into account and that SKIFS 2004:1 appropriate safety-related requirements with respect to the design, function, organisation and activities of a facility are met. The review shall be carried out systematically and shall be documented. A safety review shall be performed within those parts of the organisation responsible for the speciﬁ c issues (”primary review”). A second safety review shall be performed by a safety review function appointed for this purpose and that has an independent position relative those parts of the organisation responsible for the speciﬁ c issues (”secondary review”).

Safety Programme

After it is taken into operation, the safety of a facility shall be continuously analysed and assessed in a systematic manner. Any need for improvement regarding safety measures, engineering or organisational issues, which arise as a result of such analyses and assessments, shall be documented in a safety programme. The safety programme shall be updated on an annual basis.

Periodic Safety Review of Facilities

At least once every ten years, a new, integrated analysis and assessment of the safety of a facility shall be performed. The analyses and assessments, as well as the measures proposed on the basis of these shall be

103

documented and submitted to SKI. In the updating of the regulations, the requirements on Periodic Safety Review (PSR) have been made more stringent in order to use these reviews for assessment of time limited licensing conditions. This means that the Swedish approach to PSR becomes more in line with the European approach, where PSR is often used in the re-licensing of the nuclear power facilities.

Modiﬁ cations

A safety review shall be performed for engineering or organisational modiﬁ cations to a facility, which can affect the conditions speciﬁ ed in the safety report as well as essential modiﬁ cations to the report. Before the modiﬁ cations may be included in the report, SKI shall be notiﬁ ed and the Inspectorate can decide that additional or other requirements or conditions shall apply with respect to the modiﬁcations.

H.12.1.2

Past practices

As described in the introduction, section A.7.2, a special fee is levied on the nuclear power utilities in accordance with a special law, the Studsvik Act, to cover expenses for managing nuclear waste from old experimental facilities, in particular the facilities at Studsvik, the Ågesta reactor and the uranium mine in Ranstad. The special fee is the same for all four nuclear power utilities, currently SEK 0.0015 per kilowatt-hour, and it is reassessed annually based on a proposal by SKI.

H.12.2	Measures taken by the licence holders
H.12.2.1	Existing facilities

Waste management at Nuclear Power Units

The contents of the safety reports at the nuclear power units were revised in 2001 and more details about the origin and treatment of waste was be included, especially with regards to traceability and documentation.

Final Repository for Operational Waste (SFR)

SFR, located at the FKA site, is a central ﬁ nal repository for operational waste from the nuclear power plants and for low an intermediate waste from Studsvik. The licensee for SFR, SKB, has made an agreement with FKA for the operation of the facility. FKA has implemented the requirements of the general regulations SKIFS 2004:1 in the operating organisation. SFR beneﬁ ts from this since the management system for the operation of SFR is fully integrated with the management system for the operation of the nuclear power plants at the FKA site. SKB, as the licencee for SFR, is ultimately responsible for the implementation of the new regulations and has closely monitored the development.

SFR has been in operation since 1988. A comprehensive monitoring and control programme has been in operation since the beginning of the construction work and will continue throughout the operating period. Groundwater ﬂ ows, water chemistry, rock movement, the performance of the bentonite barrier and the properties of the waste are all monitored. Furthermore, a programme for continuous monitoring of the environment is being conducted. The information from these control and monitoring programmes provides valuable data for safety assessments.

The licence conditions include a requirement for an update of the Safety Report (SAR) at least every 10 years. Prior to the introduction of the general regulations SKIFS 1998:1 (revised as SKIFS 2004:1), the requirement for a periodic safety review (previously called ASAR: As Operated Safety Analysis Report) was only a condition in the NPP licences. In the general regulations the requirement for a periodic safety review is mandatory for all nuclear facilities. In June 2001, SKB submitted an integrated revised safety report and periodic safety review report for SFR called SAFE (see also H.15.2).

Temporary storage facilities at the NNP sites

Temporary storage for radioactive waste at the nuclear power plants, as described in section D.32.3, is in practice considered to be an integral part of the plant. The operation of the temporary storage facilities is therefore integrated with the operation of the nuclear power plants. Fulﬁ lment of the requirements in the general regulation is thereby accomplished and veriﬁ ed through regulatory review and inspection activities at the nuclear power plants.

Temporary storage facilities at the Studsvik site

Temporary storage facilities for radioactive waste at Studsvik as listed in section D.32.4.2, have individual licences.Followingtheissuanceof theSKIgeneralregulationsSKIFS1998:1revisedsafetyreportsandsafety programmes have either been submitted to SKI for review, or are under preparation for submission.

104

H.12.2.2

Past practices

The four utilities operating nuclear power reactors in Sweden have formed a special company, AB SVAFO (Sydkraft, Vattenfall, Forsmark och OKG) to deal with their responsibilities according to the Studsvik Act. AB SVAFO was acquired by Studsvik AB in 2003.

According to estimates, SEK 1.5 billion will be needed up to the year 2030 to meet the expenses for these activities. The activities performed by AB SVAFO are closely monitored by SKI.

H.12.3 Regulatory control

At the time that the convention entered into force, the general safety status of the Swedish spent nuclear facilities was satisfactory.

As accounted for in the ﬁ rst report under the Convention, SKI has developed its inspection practice as a result of the new general safety regulations (SKIFS 1998:1), revised as SKIFS 2004:1. These regulations, described in section E.19.2.4, provide a more structured approach to inspection and safety assessment and have generally improved the situation. Extensive inspections of the safety review function and fulﬁ lment of the competence assurance requirement have been carried out.

Compliance with the requirements in the general safety regulations SKIFS 1998:1 concerning the assurance of competence was inspected in 2000 at all the nuclear power sites. These inspections showed a need for improved analysis tools, in order to deﬁ ne competence requirements, for other personnel groups than operating personnel for whom a systematic approach has been used for several years. Work was initiated within the implementing organisations at all the sites to improve the analysis tools, and was in principle completed by the end of 2002.

The conclusions of SKI from these inspections were that requirements concerning documentation of the new procedures were not fully met. There was also some disagreement with the licensees about how to conduct the independent safety review in relation to the primary reviews. This issue has been addressed in joint discussions with the licensees. The safety programmes required by each licensee according to SKIFS 1998:1 have been requested by SKI and were submitted by all sites in 2000 for review.

No formal requirements for the management of spent fuel and radioactive waste were established in Sweden until the late 1970’s.

As described in section A.5.1 in the introduction, , the authorities performed a joint study during the mid 1990’s with the objective of improving the understanding of past practices regarding the management of radioactive waste. The report concludes that there is no indication of any waste containing plutonium or radium not being under satisfactory supervision. Another important conclusion in the report is the importance of keeping proper records.

H.12.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 12.

105

ARTICLE 13. SITING OF PROPOSED FACILITIES

1.Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that procedures are established and implemented for a proposed radioactive waste management facility:

(v)to evaluate all relevant site-related factors likely to affect the safety of such a facility during its operating lifetime;

(vi)to evaluate the likely safety impact of such a facility on individuals, society and the environment;

(vii)to make information on the safety of such a facility available to members of the public;

(viii)to consult Contracting Parties in the vicinity of such a facility, insofar as they are likely to be affected by that facility, and provide them, upon their request, with general data relating to the facility to enable them to evaluate the likely safety impact of the facility upon their territory.

H.13	SITING OF PROPOSED FACILITIES

ThelegislativeandregulatorysysteminSwedendoesnotdistinguishbetweenthesitingprocedureforafacility for the management of radioactive waste and the siting procedure for a facility for the management of spent nuclear fuel, with regard to the objectives of the Joint Convention. Thus, the information presented in this section is valid for all nuclear facilities, including the siting of the proposed facility for management of spent nuclear fuel. In order not to duplicate information in this report, information regarding the procedures for the siting of a nuclear facility in this section is not repeated in section G.6.

H.13.1	The regulatory requirement
H.13.1.1	Assessment of safety and environmental impact

According to the Act on Nuclear Activities a licence is required to construct, possess and operate any nuclear facility. A licence application must contain an EIA. The procedures for carrying out the EIA, as well as its contents,arespeciﬁ edintheEnvironmentalCode(seesectionE.19.1.3).Thelicensingprocedureisdescribed in section E.19.2.1.

The EIA must contain the following elements:

-A description of the activity or measure with details of its location, design and scope.

-A description of the measures being planned with a view to avoiding, mitigating or remedying adverse effects.

-The information needed to establish and assess the main impacts on human health, the environment and management of land, water and other resources that the activity or measure is likely to have.

-Adescriptionof possiblealternativesitesandalternativedesigns,togetherwithastatementof thereasons why a speciﬁ c alternative was chosen and a description of the consequences if the activity or measure is not implemented.

-A non-technical summary of the information.

In addition to the EIA the preliminary safety report for a proposed spent fuel management facility is of key importance for licence application. Requirements on the content of the safety report are given in SKI’s regulations concerning safety in certain nuclear facilities (SKIFS 2004:1), and include for example:

-A description of how the site and its surroundings, from the standpoint of safety, can affect the facility.

-A description of the design basis, including the requirements that have determined the design and construction of the facility. Descriptions of facilities for the handling of spent fuel or nuclear waste shall contain requirements that are determined by the description of safety in the particular repository after closure.

-A description of measures taken to ensure adequate protection of workers, the public and the environmentfromradiation,asrequiredbytheRadiationProtectionActandregulationspromulgatedaccording to that act.

106

AsdescribedinsectionE.19.1.1theoperatorsof nuclearpowerplantsmustjointlyperformacomprehensive R&D-programme for the safe management of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste. The purpose of this programme is to demonstrate that timely actions are taken to evaluate the safety and impacts of proposed facilities and that all relevant site-related factors are studied. The programme must be submitted every third year for regulatory review.

H.13.1.2

Public information and involvement

There are several procedures that serve the purpose to involve the public in the siting of new spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste facilities. As mentioned above, an EIA must be performed for any new nuclear facility. Swedish legislation emphasises the role of the public and other stakeholders in the EIA. The developer must initiate early (long before a licence application is submitted) consultations with those parties that might be affected by a new facility.

Parties that must be consulted include:

-municipalities that may host the facility;

-regulatory authorities, primarily SKI, SSI and County Administrative Boards;

-national environmental organisations;

-local interest groups; and

-affected individuals, e.g. those living close to a proposed location.

The County Administration Boards have an important function besides participating in the consultations. They are requested to assist the developer in identifying stakeholders and to facilitate consultations and an exchange of information.

Furthermore, the circulation of the nuclear power plants’ joint R&D programme for comments provides a broad range of concerned parties with information regarding new facilities as well as a possibility to state opinions.

AccordingtotheAct(1992:1537)andOrdinance(1981:671)ontheFinancingof FutureExpensesforSpent Nuclear Fuel etc., the municipalities that might host a spent nuclear fuel or nuclear waste facility, including a repository, are reimbursed for their own information to the public. Municipalities have been reimbursed for theirinformationactivitiessincethemid-1990s.Currentlythemunicipalitiesof ÖsthammarandOskarshamn are receiving reimbursement. In 2004 the Parliament approved a new regulation in the Financing Act, which made it possible for non-proﬁ t-making organisations to apply for ﬁ nancing, for the period of 1 January 2005–31 December 2008. The decisions concerning reimbursement are made by SKI.

H.13.1.3 Consulting Contracting Parties

The Environmental Code speciﬁ es that if another country is likely to be affected, the responsible authority as designated by the Government shall inform the competent authority in that country about the planned activity.Thecountryconcerned,andthecitizens,whomaybeaffected,shouldbegiventheopportunitytotake part in the consultation procedure. The Government has designated the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency to be responsible for this task. Such information shall also be supplied when another country, which is likely to be exposed to a signiﬁ cant environmental impact, so requests.

H.13.2

Measures taken by the licence holders

H.13.2.1 General

All planned spent fuel and nuclear waste facilities, including repositories, will be sited, constructed and operated by SKB. The supporting R&D-programme is also run by SKB.

The following activities are currently carried out by SKB:

-The R&D-programme has been reported every third year since 1986. The most recent R&D report was submitted in 2004.

-Consultations and an EIA for the planned encapsulation facility and the repository for spent nuclear fuel began formally in 2002, but in practice started in the mid-1990’s.

H.13.2.2

Consultations and environmental impact statement

Earlyconsultationshavebeencarriedoutforboththeencapsulationplantandtherepositoryforspentnuclear fuel, in both Oskarshamn and Forsmark.

Extended consultations began during 2003 with the county administrative board, other government agencies, the municipalities, the citizens and the organizations that are likely to be affected. Consultations

107

are coordinated for the encapsulation plant and repository for spent nuclear fuel. The consultations relates to location, scope, design and environmental impact of the activity or measure and the content and structure of the environmental impact statement.

The extended consultations have initially mainly dealt with the scope of EIA. Preliminary scoping reports have been prepared as a basis for discussion. Viewpoints and proposals that emerge during the consultations is taken into account in the planning of the continued EIA process.

Inthesubsequentinvestigationphase,resultsfrominvestigationsandstudiesaswellasproposalsforfacility design is presented at the consultation meetings, and the participants are given an opportunity to state their views. This phase will continue for as long as investigations, facility design work and studies are pursued.

When the necessary investigations have been completed, a preliminary EIS will be compiled. Before the application is submitted, SKB intends to verify major conclusions with the concerned consultation parties. A summary report from the consultations will be submitted together with license applications to site and construct the encapsulation plant and the repository for spent nuclear fuel, respectively.

In addition to the formal consultations, extensive information activities are aimed at municipalities, organizations and the public. These activities will continue to be pursued in parallel with the statutory consultation meetings.

H.13.3 Regulatory control

SKI reviews SKB’s R&D programme and circulates it for comments to SSI and a number of concerned organisations(e.g.universities,governmentagencies,NGOsandmunicipalitiesthatmighthostaspentnuclear fuel facility). When the review is completed the R&D programme together with SKI’s recommendations are sent to the Government for its decision.

SKI and SSI have regular consultations with SKB regarding progress in the siting of the planned facilities. SKI and SSI are consulted regarding the EIA. The concerned County Administrative Boards are also consulted regarding the EIA and thus exercise some regulatory control, however not in the ﬁ elds of nuclear

safety and radiation protection.

H.13.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 13

108

ARTICLE 14. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that:

(i)thedesignandconstructionof aradioactivewastemanagementfacilityprovideforsuitablemeasures to limit possible radiological impacts on individuals, society and the environment, including those from discharges or uncontrolled releases;

(ii)atthedesignstage,conceptualplansand,asnecessary,technicalprovisionsforthedecommissioning of a radioactive waste management facility other than a disposal facility are taken into account;

(iii)at the design stage, technical provisions for the closure of a disposal facility are prepared;

(iv)the technologies incorporated in the design and construction of a radioactive waste management facility are supported by experience, testing or analysis.

H.14 DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES

H.14.1

The regulatory requirement

The general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) apply to the operation of all types of nuclear installations, including facilities for treatment, storage and disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste.

H.14.1.1

Suitable measures to limit radiological impact

The requirements for limiting the possible radiological impact on individuals, society and the environment, including those from discharges or uncontrolled releases, are founded upon the basic provisions stipulated in 4§ ﬁ rst paragraph in the Act on Nuclear Activities (1984:3). This is clariﬁ ed further in the general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) in which it is stated that nuclear accidents shall be prevented through a basic facility-speciﬁ c design that shall incorporate multiple barriers as well as a facility-speciﬁ c defence-in-depth system.

Defence-in-depth shall be achieved by:

-ensuring that the design, construction, operation, monitoring and maintenance of a facility is such that abnormal events, incidents and accidents are prevented;

-ensuring that multiple devices and measures exist to protect the integrity of the barriers and, if the integrity should be breached, to mitigate the ensuing consequences; and

-ensuring that any release of radioactive substances, which may still occur as a result of abnormal events, incidents and accidents, is prevented or, if this is not possible, controlled and mitigated through devices and prepared measures.

H.14.1.2

Conceptual plans and provisions for decommissioning

The SKI general regulations has been updated and reissued as SKIFS 2004:1. A substantial change is that a chapter on decommissioning has been added with requirements on decommissioning plan and a speciﬁ c operational safety assessment to be done as soon as a decision has been taken on ﬁ nal closure of a facility.

H.14.1.3

Technical provisions for closure of repositories

The SKI general regulations (SKI FS 2004:1) stipulate that analyses of conditions that are of importance for the safety of a facility shall be carried out before a facility is constructed and taken into operation. This is further speciﬁ ed in the SKI regulations (SKIFS 2002:1) where it is stipulated that for repositories, the safety assessments shall also comprise features, events and processes that can lead to the dispersion of radioactive substances after closure. Such safety analyses shall be made before the commencement of repository construction, repository operation and repository closure.

109

H.14.1.4

Technology supported by experience

The general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) specify requirements regarding design and construction. It is stated that the design of the facility, with adaptation to the speciﬁ c conditions of each facility, shall:

-be able to withstand component and system failures;

-have reliability and operational stability;

-be able to withstand such events or conditions which can affect the safety function of the barriers or defence-in-depth; and

-have maintainability, controllability and testability of inherent parts as long as these parts are used for their intended purposes.

Additional requirements related to design and construction are:

-The design principles and design solutions shall be tested under conditions corresponding to those that can occur during the intended application in a facility. If this is not possible or reasonable, they must have been subjected to the necessary testing or evaluation related to safety.

-The design solutions shall be adapted to the personnel’s ability to manage the facility, in a safe manner, under normal conditions as well as during abnormal events, incidents and accidents that might occur.

-Building components, devices, components and systems shall be designed, manufactured, installed, controlled and tested in accordance with requirements that are adapted for their importance for safety.

H.14.2	Measures taken by the licence holders
H.14.2.1	Suitable measures to limit radiological impact

The safety philosophy applied in the design of all Swedish nuclear facilities is based on the principles of defence in depth and of multiple barriers to prevent the release of radioactive material to the environment. Theyarealldesignedtofulﬁ ltheintentionof therequirementsintheGeneralDesignCriteria.Thefoundation of the safety principle on the defence in depth is emphasised and made clearer through the implementation of that principle in the SKI regulations SKIFS 1998:1, revised as SKIFS 2004:1.

H.14.2.2

Conceptual plans and provisions for decommissioning

Generic decommissioning plans have been developed by SKB, as part of the basis for the annual cost calculations (see section E.19.1.4).

H.14.2.3

Technical provisions for closure of repositories

Technical provisions for the closure of the ﬁ nal repository for operational waste (SFR) have been part of the safety assessment performed before SFR was constructed. An updated safety analysis was reviewed before the facility was taken into operation.

H.14.2.4

Technology supported by experience

The principle of proven technology is broadly accepted and implemented in the design and construction procedures for Swedish nuclear facilities. The use of properly environmentally qualiﬁ ed equipment ensures functioning of safety-related systems and components under emergency conditions. A comprehensive programme for environmental qualiﬁ cation has been carried out. No major new steps are envisaged in addition to the previous programme, although research and development continues. In the modernisation work, the speciﬁ cation of all new installations is carefully checked with respect to environmental requirements.

H.14.3

Regulatory control

During the licensing process the PSAR, FSAR and STF documents are reviewed by the regulatory authorities to ensure compliance with fundamental safety principles and criteria. A prerequisite for obtaining a licence is that the regulatory review concludes that the facility is designed according to the provisions in the revised general regulations (SKIFS 2004:1).

H.14.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 14.

110

ARTICLE 15. ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY OF FACILITIES

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that:

(iii)before construction of a radioactive waste management facility, a systematic safety assessment and an environmental assessment appropriate to the hazard presented by the facility and covering its operating lifetime shall be carried out;

(iv)in addition, before construction of a disposal facility, a systematic safety assessment and an environmental assessment for the period following closure shall be carried out and the results evaluated against the criteria established by the regulatory body;

(v)before the operation of a radioactive waste management facility, updated and detailed versions of the safety assessment and of the environmental assessment shall be prepared when deemed necessary to complement the assessments referred to in paragraph (i).

H.15	ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY OF FACILITIES
H.15.1	The regulatory requirement
H.15.1.1	Assessment of safety

Requirements on the safety assessment, safety review and reporting are listed in the general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1). Many of these requirements are not new but were posed earlier as licensing conditions for facilities licensed before the regulations came into force. Some of the requirements are, however, more comprehensive compared to earlier conditions, and some are new.

The legally binding requirements regarding safety assessments are summarised in the following points:

Additional requirements concerning the long-term safety of a repository are stipulated in SKI’s regulations SKIFS 2002:1. According to the regulations, the safety assessment for a repository shall also comprise features, events and processes that can lead to the dispersion of radioactive substances after closure. Such safety assessments shall be made before repository construction, before repository operation and before repository closure. The safety assessment shall cover as long a time as barrier functions are required, but at least ten thousand years.

H.15.1.2

Environmental assessment

TheActonNuclearactivitiesalsostatesthatanEIA(EnvironmentalImpactAssessment)mustbecarriedout for all licensing cases, and that the Environmental Code regulates the way in which the EIA shall be carried out as well as the contents of the documentation in the EIS. Requirements on environmental assessment are laid down in the Environmental Code (1998:808) as described in Section E.19.1.3.

The purpose of an EIA is to establish and describe the direct and indirect impact of a planned activity or measure as listed below. Another purpose is to enable an overall assessment to be made of this impact on human health and the environment. An environmental impact statement shall contain the following information:

-A description of the activity or measure with details of its location, design and scope.

-A description of the measures being planned with a view to avoiding, mitigating or remedying adverse effects, for example action to prevent the activity or measure leading to an infringement of an environmental quality standard.

-Theinformationthatisneededtoestablishandassessthemajorimpactonhumanhealth,theenvironment and the management of land, water and other resources that the activity or measure is likely to have.

-A description of possible alternative sites and alternative designs, together with a statement of the reasons why a speciﬁ c alternative was chosen as well as a description of the consequences if the activity or measure is not implemented.

-A non-technical summary of the information.

111

H.15.1.3

The licensing procedure

Three different permits/licences are required for a nuclear facility: a permit under the Environmental Code (1998:808), a licence under the Nuclear Activities Act (1984:3), and a building permit under the Planning and Building Act (1987:10). Licensing under the Environmental Code and the Act on Nuclear Activities occur in parallel. The applications under both laws must include an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared according to the rules in Chapter 6 of the Environmental Code. The same EIS is thus used in both applications. Separate EISs are prepared for the encapsulation plant and the repository for soent nuclear fuel.

According to Chapter 17 of the Environmental Code, the Government shall, after preparation by the Environmental Court, examine the permissibility of the activity. After SKI’s preparation of the matter, the Government shall also examine permit applications under the Act on Nuclear Activities. If the Government ﬁ nds that the construction and operation of the facility is permissible according to the Environmental Code and grants a permit/licence under the Act on Nuclear Activities, it remains for the Environmental Court to grant a permit/licence and stipulate conditions in accordance with the Environmental Code.

H.15.2

Measures taken by the licence holder

SKB submitted an updated safety assessment for the repository for operational waste (SFR) in 2001. The regulatory review was ﬁ nalised in 2004 and has resulted in requirements on SKB to perform and submit complementary analyses.

The goals of the planned activities for the period 2005–2010 are as follows:

-Continuethestudiesof diffusionandsorptionof radionuclidesinhigh-pHconcreteandrock.Animpor- tant aspect is the inﬂ uence of organic compounds on radionuclide sorption at high pHs, in particular isosaccharinic acid and cement additives.

-Develop the models for concrete degradation, including the effects of saline water.

-Study the reactions between leachate from concrete and the surrounding gravel in the repository.

-Field studies and investigations of natural analogues of alkaline concrete environments.

-Studies of corrosion of metals in a concrete environment

H.15.3

Regulatory control

The safety case as a basis for licensing and nuclear supervision

The safety level to be attained and maintained by the licensee of a nuclear facility is defined in the licensing process.

The licence to build, possess and operate the facility is granted by the Government. This government licensingdecisionisappliedforandgrantedearlyinthedesignprocess.Theselicenceconditionsrequiresthat a preliminary safety analysis report (PSAR) be submitted and approved by the regulatory body before major construction activities are started. A ﬁ nal safety analysis report (FSAR) and technical speciﬁ cations for operation (STF) should also be submitted and approved by the regulatory body before operation commences.

For a repository, the safety assessment should comprise features, events and processes that can lead to the dispersion of radioactive substances after closure, as described in section H.15.1.1. Such a safety assessment shall be made before repository construction, and before repository operation and before repository closure.

The PSAR, FSAR and STF documents are reviewed by the regulatory authorities, to ensure compliance with fundamental safety principles and criteria. Based on this licensing procedure, and on approval by the regulatory authorities, the FSAR and STF documents become the legally binding documents regulating technical conﬁ guration and operating limits and conditions, often referred to as ”the safety case”. This ”safety case” may be regarded as deﬁ ning the minimum safety level that the licensee is legally committed to maintain as a condition for a permit to operate the facility. Hence, the safety case also provides the basis for regulatory supervision.

Additional licence conditions can be prescribed by SKI over time, based on national and international operating experience and new research results.

H.15.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 15.

112

ARTICLE 16. OPERATION OF FACILITIES

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that:

(i)the licence to operate a radioactive waste management facility is based upon appropriate assessments as speciﬁ ed in Article 15 and is conditional on the completion of a commissioning programme demonstrating that the facility, as constructed, is consistent with design and safety requirements;

(ii)operational limits and conditions, derived from tests, operational experience and the assessments as speciﬁ ed in Article 15 are deﬁ ned and revised as necessary;

(iii)operation, maintenance, monitoring, inspection and testing of a radioactive waste management facility are conducted in accordance with established procedures. For a disposal facility the results thus obtained shall be used to verify and to review the validity of assumptions made and to update the assessments as speciﬁ ed in Article 15 for the period after closure;

(iv)engineering and technical support in all safety-related ﬁ elds are available throughout the operating lifetime of a radioactive waste management facility;

(v)procedures for characterisation and segregation of radioactive waste are applied;

(vi)incidents signiﬁ cant to safety are reported in a timely manner by the holder of the licence to the regulatory body;

(vii)programmes to collect and analyse relevant operating experience are established and that the results are acted upon, where appropriate;

(viii)decommissioning plans for a radioactive waste management facility other than a disposal facility are prepared and updated, as necessary, using information obtained during the operating lifetime of that facility, and are reviewed by the regulatory body;

(ix)plans for the closure of a disposal facility are prepared and updated, as necessary, using information obtained during the operating lifetime of that facility and are reviewed by the regulatory body.

H.16	OPERATION OF FACILITIES
H.16.1	The regulatory requirements

The revised general safety regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) contain legally binding requirements relevant for all the obligations of Article 16. These requirements are summarised below.

H.16.1.1

Initial authorisation

As mentioned in section H.15, a preliminary comprehensive safety report is required before the construction of a spent nuclear facility. A ﬁ nal complete safety analysis report, which also takes into account the results from commissioning tests, is required before the facility is taken into operation.

H.16.1.2

Operational limits and conditions

H.16.1.3

Established procedures

Suitable, veriﬁ ed and documented procedures are required for all operational states including accidents. The procedures for operability veriﬁ cation and procedures used in other operational states than normal operation shall be subjected to a twofold safety review by the licensee. Procedures for maintenance important for safety are also covered by the requirement. Maintenance programmes shall be documented. Inspection and testing of mechanical components shall be carried out according to qualiﬁ ed methods and veriﬁ ed procedures.

113

H 16.1.4

Engineering and technical support

H.16.1.5 Procedure for characterisation and segregation of waste

All waste to be disposed of in SFR-1, which is described in detail in section D.32.4.3, must conform to predeﬁ ned waste acceptance criteria. The characteristics of each waste type are documented in a Waste Type Description (WTD). The WTDs are prepared by the waste producer in close contact with the licence holder of SFR-1 (SKB). The completed WTD is submitted to SKI and SSI for approval. SKI and SSI then jointly review the WTD and may issue speciﬁ c conditions for the disposal of particular waste type. To ensure consistent and comparable WTDs SKI and SSI have issued guidelines for the structure and content of the WTDs.

Waste to be disposed of in shallow land burial facilities are speciﬁ ed and described in the licences (see section D32.4.4). The licensee must notify SSI at least 3 months in advance of each disposal campaign and must then provide information about each waste package.

H.16.1.6 Reporting of incidents in a timely manner

SKIFS2004:1containsonechapteraboutreportingrequirementsandanannexspecifyingtheserequirements for various types of events. The following is a brief summary:

-Reporting without delay: emergency alarm events and events and conditions in category 1 (see below).

-Reporting within 16 hours: INES events at level 2 or higher.

-Reporting within 7 days: a comprehensive investigation report about alarm events or events and conditions in category 1.

-Reporting within 30 days: a comprehensive investigation report of events and conditions in category 2.

In appendix 1 of the regulations, events and conditions are speciﬁ ed which require different responses, depending on the category of events they belong to. Three categories are deﬁ ned:

Category 1

Severe deﬁ ciency observed in one or more barriers or in the defence-in-depth system, as well as a founded suspicion that safety is severely threatened. (In these cases the facility must be brought to a safe state without delay).

Category 2

Category 3

Temporary deﬁ ciency in the defence-in-depth system, which arises when such an event or condition is corrected and which, without measures could lead to a more severe condition, and which is documented in the Technical Speciﬁ cations. In all three cases, corrective measures shall be subject to a twofold safety review by the licensee. The results of these reviews shall be submitted to SKI. Regarding category 3 events, there is no requirement to make a speciﬁ c report to SKI. It is sufﬁ cient to make a compilation of these events in the annual report.

114

H.16.1.7

Programmes to collect and analyse operating experience

The licensee shall ensure that experience from its own facilities and from similar activities in other relevant facilities is continuously analysed, used and communicated to the personnel concerned (SKIFS 2004:1). It is further required that all events and conditions which are detected and which are important to safety are investigated in a systematic manner, in order to determine sequences and causes, as well as to establish the measures needed in order to restore the safety margins and to prevent recurrence.

The results of the investigations shall be disseminated within the organisation and shall contribute to the development of safety at the facility. In accordance with SKIFS 2004:1 it is the responsibility of the licensee, as long as the repository is in operation, to continuously keep informed of the conditions of importance to the assessment of repository safety, also after closure.

H.16.1.8 Decommissioning plans

In the revised general regulations SKIFS 2004:1 a chapter on decommissioning has been added with requirements on:

-A preliminary plan for the future decommissioning of the facility to be compiled as before construction of a facility.

-The decommissioning plan to be supplemented and incorporated into the facility’s safety report before the dismantling of the facility may be initiated

-A decommissioning plan and a speciﬁ c operational safety assessment to be done as soon as a decision has been taken on ﬁ nal closure of a facility.

The plan should include measures, which must be implemented to ensure the safe containment of the generated nuclear waste.

H.16.1.9

Plans for closure of repository

SKIFS 2004:1 states that a facility for the ﬁ nal disposal of nuclear waste shall be designed so that the barriers can provide the required safety without monitoring or maintenance after the repository is closed. SKI regulations concerning the long-term safety for the disposal of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste (SKI FS 2002:1) specify that the safety assessments for a repository shall also comprise features, events and processes which can lead to the dispersion of radioactive substances after closure, and that such analyses shall be made before repository construction, before repository operation and before repository closure.

The safety assessment for a repository shall cover as long a time barrier as functions are required, but at least ten thousand years. In addition the regulations specify that it is the responsibility of the licensee, as long as the repository is in operation, to continuously keep them selves informed of conditions of importance to the assessment of repository safety, also after closure.

H.16.2

Measures taken by the licence holders

Thegeneralsafetyregulations(SKIFS2004:1)containlegallybindingrequirementsrelevantforallobligations of Article 9. These requirements are summarised below.

H.16.2.1

Initial authorisation

No radioactive waste management facility has been commissioned since 1988 when the repository for radioactive operational waste (SFR-1) was licensed for operation. As described in the introduction, two additional facilitiesneedtobeconstructedandtakenintooperation:arepositoryforshort-livedlowandintermediatelevel decommissioning waste, and a repository for the disposal of long-lived low and intermediate level waste.

According to current plans, SKB is to submit a licence application for a repository for short-lived low and intermediate level decommissioning waste in 2010, and operation is planned to commence in 2020. The repository is planned to be co-sited with the existing repository for radioactive operational waste (SFR). An expansion of this facility to accommodate short-lived decommissioning waste was foreseen in conjunction with planning and licensing and is still judged to be the best solution for this waste.

Also according to current plans, the repository for long-lived LILW (SFL 3-5) will be sited in about 2035. The origin of this waste is primarily research, industry, medical applications, core-components and certain internal components from nuclear power reactors. The waste is currently stored at Studsvik, at the nuclear power plants, and at Clab. There are however preliminary plans to construct a special central interim storage for this waste.

115

H.16.2.2

Operational limits and conditions

TheoperationallimitsandconditionsfornuclearfacilitiesaredescribedintheTechnicalSpeciﬁ cations(STF), adocument,whichisconsideredtobeoneof thecornerstonesinthegoverningandregulationof theSwedish nuclear activities. Every STF is facility-speciﬁ c and is approved by SKI as part of the licensing condition.

The original STF for each facility is derived from the safety analyses in the FSAR, in which the behaviour of thefacilityisdescribed.Correctionsandupdatingtakesplace,whennewand betterknowledgeisavailable, either from research, tests or operational experience. Suggestions for changes in STF are reviewed carefully from the safety point of view at different levels in the operating organisation and are ﬁ nally approved by the regulatory body, before they are included in the document.

The fact that STF is reviewed and revised regularly has contributed to making it a living document. It is also part of the quality and management system and used frequently in particular by the operations staff. An essential part of STF is the general clause that says ”…should any doubt appear about the interpretation of the text, the general purpose of STF shall be guiding. This means that the facility in all indeﬁ nite situations shall be maintained or brought respectively to a safe state.” Other parts of STF, which have been developed more recently, are the description of the background to the document. The background description is important for preserving and transferring to new staff the knowledge and experience of those who participated in the original production of STF. Modiﬁ ed and maintained equipment must pass an operability test to verify that the equipment fulﬁ ls speciﬁ ed operational requirements before being accepted for continuous operation.

H.16.2.3

Established procedures

All activities that directly affect the operation of the facility are governed by procedures of different kinds covering normal operation, emergency operation and functional tests. Maintenance activities according to an approvedmaintenanceprogrammearealsotoagreatextentaccomplishedaccordingtoprocedures,however, not always as detailed as the operating procedures, in which activities are described in sequence, step by step. Signing off of the completion of steps carried out in the procedures is mandatory in most cases, in order to conﬁ rm the completion and facilitate veriﬁ cation.

The operating personnel are deeply involved in the production and revision of operating procedures. The development of procedures follows speciﬁ ed directives, which include the reviewing of the documents, normally, by more than one person other than the author, before being approved by the operations manager or someone else at the corresponding level. The same applies for the revision of procedures. The revision of procedures is to be carried out continuously, when new experience is obtained particularly in the case of maintenance procedures. Emergency procedures have been developed in order to deal with anticipated operational occurrences.

H.16.2.4

Engineering and technical support

The principles for stafﬁ ng are reported in section F.22 (Human and ﬁ nancial resources).

Competencethatmightnotbecompletelyavailablewithintheownorganisationatallplantsisforinstance expertiseandresourcesformaterialsandchemistryassessments,radiationshieldingandenvironmentalconsequence calculations, expertise and resources for software for safety applications and also process control and measurement techniques. In particular the IT functions have normally been outsourced, but are still available on-site. The intention is always to have the ordering competence within the operating organisation, and the capability of evaluating the results of analyses, calculations, etc. performed by consultants.

H.16.2.5

Procedure for characterisation and segregation of waste

The responsibility for the collection, segregation, characterisation, treatment and conditioning of radioactive waste rests with the waste producer. The waste producers have therefore implemented routines for ensuring that the waste complies with the predeﬁ ned WTDs or with the licence conditions for the shallow land burial facilities (see section H.16.1.5).

H.16.2.6 Incident reporting

Incidents signiﬁ cant to safety are reported according to the non-routine reporting requirements in the technical speciﬁ cations. Two types of licensee event reports (LER) exist. The more severe one, called abnormal event, requires the facility to inform SKI, and in some cases also SSI, within one hour. A ﬁ nal report shall be submitted within ten days from the time of the event and the analysis of the event and appropriate measures to prevent recurrence shall be approved by SKI. Only a very limited number of events of this category have

116

occurred at the Swedish facilities over the years. These events are typically also of such a dignity to warrant reporting in accordance with the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES).

The front of the standardised report form describes the event in general: identiﬁ cation number, title, reference to STF, date of discovery and length of time until corrective actions were completed, conditions at the time it occurred, system consequences, a contact person at the plant and activities affected by the event.

On the reverse side of the document a description of the event is given. The following titles are used:

-Event course and operational consequence;

-Safety signiﬁ cance;

-Direct and root causes;

-Planned/decided measures; and

-Lessons learned by the event.

If the description of the event is extensive additional pages may be attached to the form. Reports are also required in accordance with STF when the permitted levels of activity release from the facility are exceeded or in the event of unusually high radiation exposure to individuals. These types of non-routine reporting are primarily directed towards SSI.

H.16.2.7

Operating experience analysis and feed-back

H.16.2.8 Decommissioning plans

AsdescribedinsectionH.16.1.8requirementsforthepreparationof decommissioningplansforspentnuclear fuelfacilitieshasbeenintroducedintherevisedSKIregulationsSKIFS2004:1.Sofaronlygenericandgeneral decommissioning plans have been prepared as part of the basis for the nuclear power utilities’ cost estimates for dismantling and ﬁ nal disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste (see section H.14.2.2).

H.16.2.9

Plans for closure of repository

The closure of repositories will not take place for at least 30–50 years according to current plans. Closure is thus still part of SKB’s R&D programme and an issue for future safety assessments.

H.16.3	Regulatory control
H.16.3.1	Initial authorisation

The regulatory control is achieved through the procedures described in sections E.19.2.1 (Licensing) and E.19.2.2 (Institutional control, regulatory inspection and reporting).

H.16.3.2

Operational limits and conditions

SKI reviews applications for changes in STF, and for exemptions from STF. Based on the application and information provided by the licensees, and the associated safety analyses, assessments are made about how the proposed changes or exemptions contribute to the risk proﬁ le of the facility.

A few years ago SKI inspected the training and retraining in STF of operational, maintenance and technical support personnel. Included in the inspection was how documentation was used and kept up to date. SKI concluded that the use of STF was well understood and the training of operational personnel was well organised.However,itwasfoundthatthetrainingcouldbeimprovedforothergroupswhocomeintocontact with the requirements of STF, for instance personnel in the maintenance and chemical departments. It was also concluded that updating STF was sometimes slow, due to limited staff resources and that consultants were often used for this important task.

117

H.16.3.3 Procedures

Operational and maintenance procedures are normally not reviewed by SKI. Only in connection with event investigations would SKI ask for a procedure to be submitted for review. In the frame of quality assurance inspections or review of quality audits made by the licensees (see section F.23) have SKI looked into the routines used for updating procedures.

H.16.3.4

Engineering and technical support

H.16.3.5

Characterisation and segregation of waste

As described in section H.16.1.5 both SSI and SKI must approve all waste types before disposal. SKI and SSI verify compliance by inspections both at the waste producer and the operator of the disposal facility, e.g. SFR-1 or shallow land burial facilities. The inspections cover e.g. administrative routines, documentation, equipment, and radiological measurements.

H.16.3.6

Incident reporting

Licensee event reports are reviewed upon arrival by the responsible site inspector, who asks the facility for clariﬁ cation if necessary. As a routine all LERs are screened once a week by a standing group of inspectors and specialists in order to assess the event, the analysis and the measures taken by the licensees. If there are any regulatory concerns the issue is brought up at a management meeting and a decision made about any further measures to be taken by SKI.

H.16.3.7

Experience feedback analysis

TheregulatorycontrolisachievedthroughtheproceduresdescribedinsectionE.19.2.2(Institutionalcontrol, regulatory inspection and reporting). SKI and SSI would also in connection with event investigations and in connection with other inspections and reviews, follow up the experience feed back programme.

H.16.3.8

Plans for decommissioning

The decommissioning plans (see section H.16.1.8) must be submitted to SKI for approval before the decommissioning and dismantling activities may be started.

H.16.3.9

Plans for closure of repository

As described in section H.16.2.9 the closure of repositories is still an R&D issue and SKB has thus not yet presented any deﬁ nite plans. It is however part of SKB’s R&D programme which is subject to regulatory review every third year. The long-term safety aspects of the backﬁ ll, which will be of key importance in the closure planning, have been identiﬁ ed as one area requiring signiﬁ cant efforts.

H.16.4 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 16.

118

ARTICLE 17. INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES AFTER CLOSURE

Each Contracting Party shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that after closure of a disposal facility:

(i)records of the location, design and inventory of that facility required by the regulatory body are preserved;

(ii)active or passive institutional controls such as monitoring or access restrictions are carried out, if required; and

(iii)if, during any period of active institutional control, an unplanned release of radioactive materials into the environment is detected, intervention measures are implemented, if necessary.

H.17 INSTITUTIONAL MEASURES AFTER CLOSURE

H.17.1

Records keeping

Generally, the implementing organisations are responsible for the development and management of records. Nevertheless, R&D is being carried out on these subjects. SSI has issued regulations (SSI FS 1997:1) that establish requirements for record management, under which speciﬁ ed documents concerning location, design and inventory of waste are required to be kept in archives, for more than 100 years. These relevant records will be transferred to national and regional ofﬁ cial archives when facilities are decommissioned or closed. The authorities’ documents are regularly transferred to national archives as regulated in the Act on Archives (1990:7) and regulations issued by the National Archives of Sweden. This mechanism has been in place since 1618.

H.17.2

Measures taken by the licence holders

The R&D activities performed by SKB as a basis for the design work on repositories is based on that the design shall be such that the safety of a closed repository is not dependent on surveillance or monitoring, but that some institutional controls can be assumed to exist even after closure, for example safeguards.

H.17.3

Institutional control

Requirements for institutional control after closure are not established or formally decided. The SKI regulations (SKIFS 2004:1) stipulate that a facility for the disposal of nuclear waste shall be designed so that the barriers provide the required safety without monitoring or maintenance after the repository is closed. This is further speciﬁ ed in the SKI regulations (SKIFS 2002:1) in which it is stipulated that safety after closure of a repository shall be maintained through a system of passive barriers. Also SSI’s regulations (SSI FS 1998:1) on the protection of human health and the environment in connection with the ﬁ nal management of spent nuclear fuel and nuclear waste require that the long-term performance of a repository should not rely on any active measures.

All waste repositories so far taken into operation in Sweden – SFR-1 for low and intermediate level waste (Forsmark) and the four shallow land burial facilities for low-level waste (Oskarshamn, Forsmark, Ringhals and Studsvik) – are located within the premises of the power plant or industrial facility at that location. Access restrictions to the repositories are, therefore, maintained through the access restrictions that apply for the entire facility.

In the case of SFR-1, relevant authorities have not yet decided what measures for institutional control, either active or passive, will apply post-closure. However, the basic philosophy is applicable, that high levels of safety and radiological protection of public health and the environment shall be independent on institutional control.

In the case of the four shallow land burial facilities for low-level waste, SSI has requested institutional control for a period of up to 50 years after closure of the repository. It is for the owner and operator of the repository to demonstrate how the requirement for institutional control can be maintained over that period. For longer periods of time, it is foreseen that the environmental hazard and risk is principally of a non-radiologicalcharacter.Prolongedrequirementsforinstitutionalcontrolmaybeissuedbycountyormuni- cipal administrations. The municipalities’ detailed development plans are also of importance, by providing conditions concerning the use of the land. All nuclear facilities, including shallow land disposal facilities, are within areas where detailed development plans have been established

Exempt waste may be deposited on municipal disposal sites, and will be subject to institutional control as decided by county or municipal authorities.

119

According to SSI Regulations on the Protection of Human Health and the Environment from Discharges of Radioactive Substances from certain Nuclear Facilities (SSI FS 2000:12), the holder of a licence shall conduct environmental monitoring. All discharges from facilities for the storage or disposal of radioactive waste shall be monitored by nuclide speciﬁ c measuring programmes.

H.17.4

Intervention measures

As described above, SKI regulations stipulate that a facility for the ﬁ nal disposal of nuclear waste shall be designed so that safety after closure of a repository is provided by a system of passive barriers. Prior to the repository closure, the ﬁ nal safety assessment must be renewed and approved by the regulatory authority. If the regulatory authority approves the closure of the repository the licence holder may be relieved from his responsibilities and obligations. Thus, if intervention measures are needed, it will be the responsibility of the State.

H.17.5 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 17.

120

SECTION I – TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENT

ARTICLE 27. TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENT

1.Each Contracting Party involved in transboundary movement shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that such movement is undertaken in a manner consistent with the provisions of this Convention and relevant binding international instruments. In so doing:

(i)a Contracting Party which is a State of origin shall take the appropriate steps to ensure that transboundary movement is authorized and takes place only with the prior notiﬁ cation and consent of the State of destination;

(ii)transboundary movement through States of transit shall be subject to those international obligations which are relevant to the particular modes of transport utilized;

(iii)a Contracting Party which is a State of destination shall consent to a transboundary movement only if it has the administrative and technical capacity, as well as the regulatory structure, needed to manage the spent fuel or the radioactive waste in a manner consistent with this Convention;

(iv)a Contracting Party which is a State of origin shall authorize a transboundary movement only if it can satisfy itself in accordance with the consent of the State of destination that the requirements of subparagraph (iii) are met prior to transboundary movement;

(v)aContractingPartywhichisaStateof originshalltaketheappropriatestepstopermitre-entry into its territory, if a transboundary movement is not or cannot be completed in conformity with this Article, unless an alternative safe arrangement can be made.

2.A Contracting Party shall not licence the shipment of its spent fuel or radioactive waste to a destination south of latitude 60 degrees South for storage or disposal.

3.Nothing in this Convention prejudices or affects:

(i)the exercise, by ships and aircraft of all States, of maritime, river and air navigation rights and freedoms, as provided for in international law;

(ii)rights of a Contracting Party to which radioactive waste is exported for processing to return, or provide for the return of, the radioactive waste and other products after treatment to the State of origin;

(iii)the right of a Contracting Party to export its spent fuel for reprocessing;

(iv)rights of a Contracting Party to which spent fuel is exported for reprocessing to return, or provide for the return of, radioactive waste and other products resulting from reprocessing operations to the State of origin.

I.27	TRANSBOUNDARY MOVEMENT
I.27.1	Regulatory requirement

There are four different Acts that must be considered in order to obtain a complete picture of the Swedish regulatory requirements regarding transboundary movement of spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste:

-the Radiation Protection Act;

-the Nuclear Activities Act;

-Council Regulation (EC) No 1334/2000; and

-the Act on Control of Export of Dual-use Products and Technical Assistance.

In summary, a licence to export spent nuclear fuel or radioactive waste from Sweden cannot be granted if the destination is:

i.south of latitude 60 degrees south;

ii.a State party to the Fourth ACP-EEC Convention which is not a member of the European Union;

iii.a State that has forbidden the import of spent nuclear fuel or radioactive waste; or

iv.a State that, in the opinion of the responsible Swedish authorities, does not have the technical, legal or administrative resources to manage the spent nuclear fuel or radioactive waste safely.

I.27.2

Regulatory control

SwedenfollowstheadministrativeproceduressetforthintheDirective92/3/Euratominordertoensurethat states of destination and states of transit have the opportunity to give their prior consent, and are notiﬁ ed

121

as is stated in the directive. However, since the Swedish deﬁ nition of nuclear waste is broader than the current deﬁ nition in Directive 92/3/Euratom, all nuclear waste cannot be handled according to this procedure, since some of the waste is regarded as ‘material’ according to the deﬁ nition in the directive. In those cases licences are granted on a case-by-case basis.

A licence to import nuclear waste for processing may only be issued on condition that the remaining radioactive waste is re-exported to the country of origin.

I.27.3

Experience of transboundary movements

StudsvikNuclearABcarriesoutvolumereductionof radioactivewasteonacommercialbasis,byincineration of combustible waste and melting of scrap metal. The activities are to a certain extent based on services to companies abroad, and Studsvik imports radioactive waste and scrap metal for the purpose of volume reduction. The remaining radioactive waste is re-exported to the country of origin.

I.27.4 Conclusion

The Swedish party complies with article 27 for such radioactive waste that is covered by the deﬁ nition in the Directive 92/3/Euratom. Due to the Swedish deﬁ nition of nuclear waste, a case-by-case licensing procedure must be applied in some cases.

122

SECTION J – DISUSED SEALED SOURCES

ARTICLE 28. DISUSED SEALED SOURCES

1.Each Contracting Party shall, in the framework of its national law, take the appropriate steps to ensure that the possession, remanufacturing or disposal of disused sealed sources takes place in a safe manner.

2.A Contracting Party shall allow for reentry into its territory of disused sealed sources if, in the framework of its national law, it has accepted that they be returned to a manufacturer qualiﬁ ed to receive and possess the disused sealed sources.

J.28	DISUSED SEALED SOURCES
J.28.1	Regulatory requirements

All handling of disused sealed sources (possession, remanufacturing, disposal) is covered by the Radiation Protection Act (SFS 1988:220). However, remanufacturing of disused sealed sources does not take place in Sweden. According to the Act, anyone that has conducted activities involving sealed sources has to ensure the safe management and disposal of the disused sealed sources. Detailed requirements are found in the following SSI regulations.

SSI’s Regulations on Radiation Therapy (SSI FS 2000:4) stipulate that in the case of the purchase of radioactive sources or equipment, which contains such sources, a plan shall be drawn up for the future handling of radioactive waste.

SSI’s Regulations on Accelerators and Sealed Sources (SSI FS 2000:9) stipulate that the licence-holder shall ensure that an up-to-date and documented plan exists for decommissioning the plant. The plan shall include an analysis of the resources needed to take care of all radioactive substances and radioactive demolition waste in a safe way from a radiation protection point of view, should the question of decommissioning arise.

In SSI’s Regulations on the Use of Equipment in Industry Containing Sealed Sources or X-Ray Tubes (SSI FS 1995:2) it is stipulated that equipment containing a radioactive source that will not be used anymore, shall be sent to a radioactive waste management facility within six months.

Sweden allows the re-entry of disused sealed sources into its territory for return to Studsvik Nuclear AB, the only manufacturer of sealed sources in Sweden. Studsvik Nuclear AB has a licence from the Government for irradiation and from SSI to manufacture sealed sources and receive and possess disused

sealed sources.
J.28.2	Regulatory control

Disused sealed sources are either returned to the supplier or manufacturer, or sent to Studsvik Nuclear AB. StudsvikistheonlyapprovedradioactivewastemanagementfacilityinSwedenforhandlingradiationsources that need a licence. However, Studsvik Nuclear AB is not required to accept, handle or dispose of disused sealed sources without compensation, since the company operates on a commercial basis. Hence, problems may arise if the holder of a sealed source cannot afford the cost for the handling at Studsvik, or if Studsvik refuses to handle a sealed source.

A Governmental committee was appointed in 2002 to consider and propose a national system for management and disposal, not only of disused sealed sources but also of all kinds of radioactive waste generated outside the nuclear fuel cycle. The committee report was submitted to the Government in December 2003 and suggested among other things a system for producer responsibility covering all products that utilize radioactivesubstances.Thereportalsosuggestedthattheproducerresponsibilityshouldalsoincludehistoric waste, like orphan radiation sources. This is further discussed in section K.2.

The EC directive on High Activity Sealed Sources, 2003/122/Euratom, will be incorporated into laws, regulations and administrative provisions before the 31 of December 2005. One important aspect will be to establish requirements on holders of a high activity sealed source to secure ﬁ nancial guarantees.

The EC Directive on Waste from Electrical and Electronic Equipment, 2002/96/EC, entered into force August 13, 2005, comprises e.g. smoke detectors. Ionising smoke detectors may be of low activity compared to other sealed sources but they have been imported into Sweden in quite large quantities for several years,

123

thus comprising a possible radiation protection problem when discarded units are to be handled. The SSI Regulations on Smoke Detectors for Domestic Use Containing Radioactive Sources (SSI FS 1992:4) were amended in 2003 to harmonize with the EC Directive.

J.28.3 Conclusion

The Swedish Party complies with the obligations of Article 28. There is however room for improvement when it comes to the handling and ﬁ nal storage of disused sealed sources in a manner that is satisfactory from a radiation protection point of view.

124

SECTION K – PLANNED ACTIVITIES

TO IMPROVE SAFETY

K.1 INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION

K.1.1 SKI and SSI

Important international work for the regulatory authorities follows as a consequence of the Swedish ratiﬁ - cation of international conventions and having signed bilateral and multilateral agreements. In these cases the Government often assigns the task of providing expert knowledge and fulﬁ lling Swedish obligations to the authorities.

In addition, international sharing of efforts and results is considered as crucial by Sweden for efﬁ cient regulatorywork.Swedenconsidersitimportantthatnationalregulatoryprogrammesareopentointernational scrutiny and peer review, since these mechanisms provide a form of quality assurance.

For these reasons SKI participates actively in a number of IAEA, OECD/NEA, and EU committees and working groups. SKI is also a member of INRA (International Nuclear Regulatory Association) and WENRA (Western European Nuclear Regulators Association).

Senior experts from SSI are active participants in, for example, the International Commission on RadiologicalProtection(ICRP),theOECD/NEA,IAEA,EUcommitteesandworkinggroups,andtheUNScientiﬁ c Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR).

Both SKI and SSI have bilateral agreements with the corresponding authorities in a number of countries, e.g. the Nordic Countries, Canada, France, Japan, Lithuania, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, and USA.

SKI’s and SSI’s international engagement is not limited to regulatory issues but also includes participation ininternationalresearchprojects.Mostof theseprojectsarewithinEU’sresearchprogramme,OECD/NEA and the IAEA.

Theinternationalactivitiesareveryextensiveintheﬁ eldsof nuclearsafetyandradiationprotection.Evenif theactivitiesaregenerallyregardedasimportant,SKIandSSIconstantlyhavetoprioritisetheirparticipation, because of limited staff resources. Cases, where the tasks are directly regulated by conventions or special agreements signed by Sweden, have the highest priority. Participation in standing groups of international organisationsisalsogivenhighpriority.Otherinternationaltasksaregivenpriorityaccordingtotheestimated importance of the individual case.

K.1.2 SKB

SKB also gives international co-operation high priority, and has bilateral agreements with corresponding organisations in Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Spain, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA.

The main aim for SKB’s international activities is to follow the research and development work conducted in other countries and to participate in international projects within the ﬁ eld of nuclear waste management. Furthermore, the international work provides perspective to the domestic programme and contributes to maintaining state-of-the art competence in relevant scientiﬁ c areas.

SKB actively participates in several IAEA, EU and OECD/NEA committees and working groups. SKB is also engaged in a large number of research projects within these international organisations. SKB is currently participating in 6th Framework Programme and has actively proposed areas for future research and development in the 7th Framework Programme.

The cooperation with Posiva in Finland has been extended and comprises some 50 projects in the ﬁ elds of repository technology, site investigation and encapsulation techniques (March 2005).

One important example of SKB’s international research co-operation is the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory, and in March 2005 organisations from Finland, France, Germany, Japan, Spain, Switzerland, Canada and the Czech Republic are carrying out joint studies at Äspö.

K.1.3 SKI’s and SSI’s international support programmes

SKI receives a special grant from the Government for co-operation with Eastern and Central Europe in the area of nuclear safety and waste management. The Swedish International Project Nuclear Safety (SIP) was launched in 1992 and is a project unit within SKI established to administer and manage this work. The radiation protection support, which also deals with radiation protection outside the nuclear power sector, has been handled by SSI’s department for International Development Co-operation (SIUS) since 1997.

125

The aims of the bilateral assistance are:

-to improve reactor safety and minimise the risk of a nuclear accident with uncontrolled radioactive releases at the facilities in question;

-to improve conditions so that radioactive waste, including spent nuclear fuel, shall be handled and stored in a manner that is acceptable from the point of view of safety and radiation protection, regarding personnel, the public and environment;

-tostrengthenthelegislationandexercisingof authorityinconnectionwithnuclearfacilitiesandhandling of radioactive waste; and

-to contribute to the development and strengthening of the countries’ authorities and organisations within the national emergency preparedness and to establish co-operation in the event of an emergency situation in the Baltic region.

Throughthisco-operation,allrelevantorganisationsintherecipientcountryreceivesupportsoastostrengthen the entire nuclear infrastructure. These organisations include nuclear power plants, ministries, regulatory authorities and technical support organisations.

SIP’s activities have focused on improving the safety and organisation at the Ignalina nuclear power plant, as well as on support for the development of the Lithuanian regulatory authority. Support has also been directed towards radioactive waste management and the preparation of the decommissioning of Ignalina’s Unit 1. The total support to Lithuania during the period 1992–2004 amounted to SEK 436 million.

In spring 2001, the Swedish Parliament took a decision to change the future direction of the nuclear safety support. When Lithuania became a member of the EU, the Swedish cooperation with Lithuania was transformed into a regular cooperation on the same conditions as with other countries within the EU and the focus for nuclear safety support was shifted to north-west Russia.

Since 1996, SIP’s support has also included Russia, where co-operation in the area of nuclear safety was initiated with the Leningrad nuclear power plant. In 1998, SIP started the assistance programme at the Kola nuclear power plant, and thereafter initiated its involvement in the projects connected to handling of radioactive waste in North-western Russia. The total support to Russia during the period 1996–2004 amounted to SEK 135 million.

There is extensive international co-operation concerning nuclear safety in Central and Eastern Europe. SIP and SIUS participate in relevant activities within EU, IAEA and EBRD (European Bank of Construction and Development). Within the bilateral programmes the efforts are co-ordinated with other countries’ programmes and with the international activities in order to obtain higher efﬁ ciency and a concentration of resources.

From 1 July 2005, all SKI’s bilateral nuclear safety support activities (nuclear safety, waste management and non-proliferation) will be integrated into one project unit.

K.2 THE MANAGEMENT OF NON-NUCLEAR RADIOACTIVE WASTE

Asmentionedintheintroduction(sectionA)thewastemanagementsystemof non-nuclearradioactivewaste in Sweden is not complete. This has created a number of issues that need to be solved within the near future. For instance, the present legislation does not require funding for the future costs of treatment and ﬁ nal disposal of non-nuclear radioactive waste. Likewise, should a licence-holder of activities involving radiation go bankrupt it is unclear both legally and economically, who has the responsibility for the management (and ﬁ nal disposal) of the resultant radioactive waste.

An additional issue is the fact that there is only one facility in Sweden, Studsvik AB, that has the competence and capacity to treat non-nuclear radioactive waste and that Studsvik operates on a commercial basis and thus is not legally required to manage any waste. This might also cause problems for those who are in possession of waste and cannot afford the cost for the handling at Studsvik, or if Studsvik refuses to handle the waste in question. Furthermore, the problem of waste from naturally occurring radioactive material has increased in society throughout the years.

A Governmental committee was appointed in 2002 to consider and propose a national system for the handling and ﬁ nal disposal of radioactive waste generated outside the nuclear fuel cycle, with due consideration to environmental, economical and legal aspects. The ﬁ nal report was submitted to the Government in December 2003 and suggested among other things a system for producer responsibility covering all products that utilize radioactive substances. The report also suggested that the producer responsibility should also include historic waste, like orphan radiation sources.

The incorporation of the EC Directives 2003/122/Euratom and 2002/96/EG into Swedish legislation during2005realizesthecommittee’sthoughtswhenitcomestohighactivitysealedsourcesandsmokedetectors (see also section J.28.2). There are still some issues that have to be solved when it comes to the management of non-nuclear radioactive waste though. The Government is currently evaluating the committee report.

126

K.3 COMMISSION OF INQUIRY ON THE FINANCING SYSTEM

As a consequence of the energy policy decision in 1997, which indicated that 2010 is no longer the ﬁ nal year for operation of Swedish nuclear power plants, a Governmental committee was appointed to review possible improvements to the ﬁ nancing system.

The Committee submitted its report to the Government in December 2004. The Committee’s proposal is that a total active life of 40 years should be assumed for each reactor, though assuming a residual active life of not less than six years. It is proposed that this assumption apply unless it can be assumed at the time an estimate is made that the reactor in question will be shut down a certain year. It is proposed that the cost, or in other words the fund accumulation requirement, be covered in the fee estimates over the assumed residual active life or, where relevant, over a three-year fee period after the reactors have been decommissioned.

Further more the Committee suggests extended liability for the nuclear industry. If there is insufﬁ cient money in the funds, the nuclear industry will still be liable. The liability rests with the licence-holders (reactor owners). This responsibility, however, is limited to the companies that own reactors. Yet these companies have extremely limited assets other than their nuclear reactors and can therefore not be expected to have the capacity to cover the costs when the reactors shut down.

The Committee therefore proposes that ability to pay and liability are brought into line by a formal liability for payment by owning company. Furthermore the Committee’s proposal means that the liability of the industry for costs will be formalised by extending the liability to pay fees until the time at which the ﬁ nal disposal sites are sealed. The Government is currently evaluating the committee report.

K.4 DEVELOPMENT OF WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR LONG-LIVED WASTE

Final disposal of long-lived waste, e.g. core components, is planned to take place when decommissioning of most of the Swedish NPPs have been initiated. Long-lived waste therefore has to be kept in interim storage until then for some time. SKB has studied different alternatives for interim storage of this waste.

The overall goals of the management of long-lived lowand intermediate level waste during the period 2005–2010 are to:

-implement a system for dry interim storage of core components;

-prepare for future safety assessments for repositories;

-develop handling and storage systems for waste packages in cooperation with the NPPs;

-performpreliminarysafetyevaluationsforﬁ naldisposalof short-livedoperationalanddecommissioning waste in a re-licensed SFR facility; and

-evaluate prospects for a shallow repository for very low-level decommissioning waste.

127

128

List of references

Financing. Covering the expenses of nuclear waste. SKI Brochure. March, 2000.

Högberg L, Svensson G & Viktorsson C. Regulation for continuous improvements – the new regulatory strategy of SKI. Presentation at IAEA International Conference on Topical Issues in Nuclear, Radiation and Radioactive Waste Safety, 31 August - 4 September, 1998.

Leijonhufvud S. A history about Nuclear Power in Sweden. Issued in connection with the 25 year jubilee of ABB Atom (in Swedish).

Quality Assurance for Safety in Nuclear Power Plants and other Nuclear Installations. IAEA Safety Series No 50-C/SG-Q. Vienna, 1996.Melber B, Durbin N, Lach D & Blom I.

Quality Systems Evaluation Method: Development and Implementation. Volume 1. SKI Report 95:62.

Nucleus 2/2003. Special english edition. May, 2003.

Act on Nuclear Activities, SFS 1988:220 (in Swedish).

Radiation Protection Act, SFS 1988:1597 (in Swedish).

Act on the Financing of certain Nuclear Waste, SFS 1992:1537 (in Swedish).

Act on the Financing of Future Expenses on Spent Nuclear Fuel, SFS 1998:808 (in Swedish).

Environmental Code, SFS 2000:1064, (in Swedish).

Act on the Control of Dual-use Items and Technical Assistance (in Swedish).

SKB. CLAB-ASAR-96. Peridoc Safety Review, Experiences 1985-1996, SKB Report R-97-12, 1997 (in Swedish).

SKB. RD&D-Programme 2004, Programme for research, development and demonstration of methods for the management and disposal of nuclear waste, including social science research, SKB Report TR-04-21, September 2004.

SKB. SFR-1, Repository for Operational Waste, Safety Analyses Report.

June, 2001 (in Swedish).

SSI and SKI’s Review of SKB’s updated Final Safety Review for SFR-1. SKI Report 2004:47, SSI Report 2004:06, June 2005 (In Swedish).

SKI. SKI-ASAR-CLAB Periodic Safety Review 1997, CLAB, SKI Report 00:37, August, 2000 (in Swedish).

SKI. The Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate’s Review Statement and Evaluation of the

Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co’s RD&D Programme 2004.

SKI Report 2005:31, June 2005 (in Swedish).

SKI. Proposal for fees and guarantees for 2005, SKI Report 2004:39, October 2004 (in Swedish).

SKI Annual Report 2004 (in Swedish).

129

SSI Annual Report 2004 (in Swedish).

SOU 1976:32: Spent nuclear fuel and radioactive waste.

SOU 1996:73: Swedish Nuclear Regulatory Activities – Volume 1 – An Assessment.

SOU 1996:74: Swedish Nuclear Regulatory Activities – Volume 2 – Descriptions.

SOU 2003:122: Commission report on the management of Non-Nuclear Radioactive Waste, December 2003, (in Swedish).

SOU 2004:125: Commission report on the review of the Financing System, December 2004 (in Swedish).

The safetyand radiation protection status of the Swedish Nuclear Power Plants 2004.

SKI Report 2005:32, SSI Report 2005:05 (in Swedish).

KASAM website:	www.kasam.org
SKI website:	www.ski.se
SSI website:	www.ssi.se
SKB website:	www.skb.se
Governments website:	www.regeringen.se

130

Departementsserien 2005

Kronologisk förteckning

1.Finansiella konglomerat. Fi.

2.Kungörande i PoIT. Redovisning av uppdrag om elektroniskt kungörande. Ju.

3.Svensk rätt i integrationspolitisk belysning. Ju.

4.Avräkning av utländsk skatt. Fi.

5.Angrepp mot informationssystem. Ju.

6.Brott och brottsutredning i IT-miljö. Europarådets konvention om IT-relaterad brottslighet med tilläggsprotokoll. Ju.

7.Iakttagelser om landsting. Fi.

8.Inriktning på filmpolitiken från 2006. U.

9.En moderniserad rättsprövning, m.m. Ju.

10.Arbetstagarinflytande i europakooperativ. N.

11.Den europeiska exekutionstiteln för obestridda fordningar. Ju.

12.Makten och mångfalden. Eliter och etnicitet i Sverige. Ju.

13.Försäkringsbolags tillgång till patientjournaler. Ju.

14.Olovlig befattning med narkotikaprekursorer. EU:s rambeslut om olaglig narkotikahandel. Ju.

15.Förstärkning och förenkling – ändringar i anställningsskyddslagen och föräldraledighetslagen. N.

16.Att fånga kunnandet om lärande och undervisning. Om villkoren för skolledare och lärare att ta del av systematiskt framtagen kunskap om utbildningsverksamhet. U.

17.Internationell insolvens. Ju.

18.Säkerhet i vägtunnlar. N.

19.De projektbaserade mekanismerna enligt Kyotoprotokollet och länkdirektivet. M.

20.Svenskt värdskap för ESS. U.

21.Tvångsmedel för att förebygga eller förhindra allvarlig brottslighet. Ju.

22.Småskalig livsmedelsförädling. Jo.

23.Ett förnyat strandskydd. M.

24.Tidsbegränsat uppehållstillstånd för offer för människohandel m.fl. UD.

25.Förhandsavgörande från EG-domstolen. Ju.

26.Utökat informationsutbyte mellan arbetslöshetskassorna och inom Arbetsmarknadsverkets verksamhet. N.

27.Arbetsgivares informationsskyldighet

–ändringar i anställningsskyddslagen. N.

28.Skattefusk, effektivitet och rättvisa

–utökad skattekontroll i vissa branscher och diskussioner rörande schabloniserade inslag i beskattningen. Fi.

29.Förslag om ett utvecklat elcertifikatsystem. M.

30.En anpassad försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet. Fö.

31.Anpassningar till nya EG-bestämmelser om livsmedel, djurhälsa, foder, djurskydd och växtskydd m.m. + Bilagor. Jo.

32.Minknäringen i Sverige. Jo.

33.Vuxenutbildningslag.

Förslag utarbetat inom Utbildnings- och kulturdepartementet. U.

34.Några bodelningsfrågor. Ju.

35.Rätten att sätta och utfärda betyg. U.

36.Genomförande av EG-direktivet om uppehållstillstånd för studier. UD.

37.Bulgariens och Rumäniens anslutning till Europeiska unionen. + Bilagor. UD.

38.Tillträde till Förenta nationernas konvention mot korruption. Ju.

39.Bostadsfinansiering. M.

131

40.Genomförande av EG-direktivet om mänskliga vävnader och celler. S.

41.Högsta och lägsta belopp för penningböter. Ju.

42.Kontraheringsplikt vid företagsförsäkring m.m. – en diskussionspromemoria. Ju.

43.Genomförande av direktivet och rambeslutet om åtgärder mot förorening från fartyg. N.

44.Sweden's second national report under the Joint Convention on the safety of spent fuel management and on the safety of radioactive waste management.

Swedish implementation of the obligations of the Joint Convention. M.

132

Departementsserien 2005

Systematisk förteckning

Justitiedepartementet

Kungörande i PoIT. Redovisning av uppdrag om elektroniskt kungörande. [2]

Svensk rätt i integrationspolitisk belysning. [3] Angrepp mot informationssystem. [5]

Brott och brottsutredning i IT-miljö. Europarådets konvention om IT-relaterad brottslighet med tilläggsprotokoll. [6]

En moderniserad rättsprövning, m.m. [9] Den europeiska exekutionstiteln

för obestridda fordningar. [11]

Makten och mångfalden. Eliter och etnicitet i Sverige. [12]

Försäkringsbolags tillgång till patientjournaler. [13]

Olovlig befattning med narkotikaprekursorer. EU:s rambeslut om olaglig narkotikahandel. [14]

Internationell insolvens. [17]

Tvångsmedel för att förebygga eller förhindra allvarlig brottslighet. [21]

Förhandsavgörande från EG-domstolen. [25] Några bodelningsfrågor. [34]

Tillträde till Förenta nationernas konvention mot korruption. [38]

Högsta och lägsta belopp för penningböter. [41]

Kontraheringsplikt vid företagsförsäkring m.m.

– en diskussionspromemoria. [42]

Utrikesdepartementet

Tidsbegränsat uppehållstillstånd för offer för människohandel m.fl. [24]

Genomförande av EG-direktivet om uppehållstillstånd för studier. [36] Bulgariens och Rumäniens anslutning

till Europeiska unionen. + Bilagor. [37]

Försvarsdepartementet

En anpassad försvarsunderrättelseverksamhet. [30]

Socialdepartementet

Genomförande av EG-direktivet om mänskliga vävnader och celler. [40]

Finansdepartementet

Finansiella konglomerat. [1] Avräkning av utländsk skatt. [4] Iakttagelser om landsting. [7] Skattefusk, effektivitet och rättvisa

– utökad skattekontroll i vissa branscher och diskussioner rörande schabloniserade inslag i beskattningen. [28]

Utbildnings- och kulturdepartementet

Inriktning på filmpolitiken från 2006. [8] Att fånga kunnandet om lärande och undervisning. Om villkoren för skolledare och lärare att ta del av systematiskt framtagen kunskap om utbildningsverksamhet. [16]

Svenskt värdskap för ESS. [20] Vuxenutbildningslag.

Förslag utarbetat inom Utbildnings- och kulturdepartementet. [33]

Rätten att sätta och utfärda betyg. [35]

Jordbruksdepartementet

Småskalig livsmedelsförädling. [22] Anpassningar till nya EG-bestämmelser om

livsmedel, djurhälsa, foder, djurskydd och växtskydd m.m. + Bilagor [31]

Minknäringen i Sverige. [32]

Miljö- och samhällsbyggnadsdepartementet

De projektbaserade mekanismerna enligt Kyotoprotokollet och länkdirektivet. [19]

133

Ett förnyat strandskydd. [23]

Förslag om ett utvecklat elcertifikatsystem. [29]

Bostadsfinansiering. [39]

Sweden's second national report under the Joint Convention on the safety of spe nt fuel management and on the safety of adioactive waste management.

Swedish implementation of the obligations of the Joint Convention. [44]

Näringsdepartementet

Arbetstagarinflytande i europakooperativ. [10] Förstärkning och förenkling – ändringar i

anställningsskyddslagen och föräldraledighetslagen. [15]

Säkerhet i vägtunnlar. [18] Utökat informationsutbyte mellan

arbetslöshetskassorna och inom Arbetsmarknadsverkets verksamhet. [26]

Arbetsgivares informationsskyldighet

– ändringar i anställningsskyddslagen. [27] Genomförande av direktivet och rambeslutet

om åtgärder mot förorening från fartyg. [43]

134

Address: Fritzes, Customer Service, 106 47 Stockholm Telefax: +46 8 690 91 91, Telephone: +46 8 690 91 90 E-mail: order.fritzes@nj.se

Internet: www.fritzes.se

ISBN 91-38-22446-1

ISSN 0248-60112